Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.18064/JKASI.2019.17.3.014

Study of Validity and Interrater Reliability of Korean Version of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale 2  

Lee, Ji-Ho (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School, Inje University)
Kim, Kyeong-Mi (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Medical Affairs, Inje University)
Chang, Moon-Young (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Medical Affairs, Inje University)
Hong, Eunkyoung (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Shinsung University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration / v.17, no.3, 2019 , pp. 14-25 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : This study aims to verify the content validity and inter-rater reliability of the Korean version of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale 2 (PDMS-2) and to identify the concurrent validity by comparing it with the Korean version of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2). Methods : PDMS-2 was translated by the researcher and an eighth-year clinical occupational therapist. The content consistency of the Korean version of the PDMS-2 was verified by three professors with experience using it. After the verification of the content consistency of the PDMS-2 by the five clinical occupational therapists and the additional revision, the Korean version of the PDMS-2 was completed. The researcher and another occupational therapist evaluated the Korean version of PDMS-2 in 50 children and measured the inter-rater reliability. Concurrent validity was measured by comparing the results of the Korean version of PDMS-2 and Korean version of BOT-2. Results : The content consistency test showed overall agreement of mean 3.45, and the content understanding test showed a high level of understanding of mean 3.69. The inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Korean version of the PDMS-2 showed a statistically significant correlation. Conclusion : The Korean version of the PDMS-2 showed high content understanding, reliability, and validity. It can assist clinicians and researchers who work in fields related to child treatment or development.
Keywords
motor development test; reliability; validity; BOT-2; PDMS-2;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, S. H., Hong, C. R., & Park, H. Y. (2018). Current trend in use of occupational therapy assessment tool by pediatric occupational therapist. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 16(3), 23-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.18064/JKASI.2018.16.3.023
2 Lim, Y. J., Park, K. Y., & Yoo, E. Y. (2007). Pilot study to establish content validity of a Korean-translated version of a sensory profile. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 15(2), 25-42.
3 Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-385.
4 Margo, J. H., Edith, H. C., & Rob, A. O. (2005). Reliability and validity of the fine motor scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2. Occupational Therapy International, 12(1), 1-13.   DOI
5 Maring, J. R., & Elbaum, L. (2007). Concurrent validity of the early intervention developmental profile and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 19(2), 116-120.   DOI
6 Montgomery, P. C., & Connolly, B. H. (1987). Norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests: Use in pediatrics and application to task analysis of motor skill. Physical Therapy, 67(12), 1873-1876.   DOI
7 Palisano, R. J., Kolobe, T. H., Haley, S. M., Pax Lowes, L., & Jones, S. L. (1995). Validity of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale as an evaluative measure of infants receiving physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 75(11), 939-948.   DOI
8 Provost, B., Crowe, T. K., & McClain, C. (2000). Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II motor scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales in two-year-old children. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 20(1), 5-18.   DOI
9 An, S. Y. (2012). Statistical methods for assessment of validities and reliabilities. Master's thesis, Daejeon University, Daejeon.
10 Barbara, H. C., Nancy, O., & Roberta, G. (2012). Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2. Pediatric Physical therapy, 24(4), 345-352.   DOI
11 Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Research, 1(3), 185-216.
12 Choi, J. H. (2009). Study of validity of Korean version Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2. Master's thesis, Inje university, Gimhae-si.
13 Folio, M. R., & Fewell, P. R. (2000). Peabody developmental motor scales(2nd. ed.), Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.
14 Robert, J. P., Thubi, H. K., Stephen, M. H. Linda, P. L., & Sandra, L. J. (1995). Validity of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale as an evaluative measure of infants receiving physical therapy. American Physical Therapy Association, 75(11), 939-948.
15 Ronald, V. C., Micheal, H., & Erick, M. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the movement assessment battery for children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93(1), 275-280.   DOI
16 Schmidt, L. S., Westcott, S. L., & Crown, T. K. (1993). Interrater reliability of the gross motor scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales with 4-and 5-year-old children. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 5(1), 169-175.
17 Su, C. T., & Parham, L. D. (2002). Generating a valid questionnaire translation for cross-cultural use. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 581-585.   DOI
18 Tecklin, J. S. (2010). Pediatric physical therapy. Seoul, Korea: Yeongmunsa.