Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2019.20.3.022

CM at Risk Case Study on Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract - Focused on Cases for USA -  

Jeong, Jinhak (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
Han, Jonghoon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
Lee, Joosung (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
Ahn, Yonghan (Department of Architecture, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.20, no.3, 2019 , pp. 22-30 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to derive basic data of the Guaranteed Maximum Price(GMP) process and to present specimens that can be used at the time of execution of CM at Risk project in South Korea. CM at Risk project is issued in South Korea, but the actual data is lack. On the other hand, CM at Risk project is universalized and the market of the CM at Risk is steadily growing. Because of that, in this study, The United States cases was selected as a sample. GMP consists of CM's fee, CM contingency, project direct cost, project indirect cost, allowance. GMP negotiations are performed before the end of design completion, and after 3 rounds of estimation comparison, preliminary GMP is confirmed. GMP can be multiple contract and it is useful for Procurement of long lead materials and early construction. If the actual cost is lower than expected GMP, sharing of the saving is an option since the conflict of interests between the client and the contractor can occur.
Keywords
CM at Risk; GMP; CM Fee; CM Contingency; Allowance; Saving Share;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ahn, Y.H. (2013). "CM at Risk Delivery Method in US Public Construction." Construction Enginerring and Management, pp. 69-72.
2 Byambadorj, T. (2012). "A Study of Factors that Caused 'CM at Risk's Inactivity and Proposal for the System Improvement." M.S. Dissertation, Department of Architecture, Soongsil University, pp. 1-44.
3 Colin, R. (2002). Real World Research. 2nd ed, Blackwell Publishers, pp. 220-223.
4 Gustafsson, H., Kentta, G., Hassmen, P., Lundqvist, C., and Durand, N. (2007). "The Process of burnout : A Multiple Case Study of Three Elite Endurance Athletes." International Journal of Sport Psychology, EDIZIONE L POZZI, 38(4), pp. 388-416.
5 Hyun, C.T., Go, G.H., and Kim, Z.H. (2018). "Probabilistic Earlier GMP Calculation Method for Apartment Using CM at Risk." Building Construction, The Korea Institute of Building Construction, 18(3), pp. 295-303.
6 Jang, C.K., Lee, B.N., Choi, S.I., and Lee, D.K. (2006). "Understanding of CM at Risk and Diagnosis of introduction Possibility." Research Report, Consruction and Economy Research Institute of Korea, 2006(5), pp. 1-130.
7 Kim, S.R., Lee, S.H., and Ahn, Y.H. (2016). "GMP Process of Cm at Risk Delivery Method for Construction Company of USA." Proceeding of Annual Conference, Architectural Institute of Korea, 36(2), pp. 1058-1059.
8 Kim, E.J., and Yu, I.H., (2015). "Suggestions to Improve the System for Introducing CM at Risk System of Specialty Construction Contractors." Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, Architectural Institute of Korea, 17(2), pp. 129-136.
9 Kim, J.H. (2010). "An Analysis about Factors Affecting Inactiveness of CM at Risk at Korean Construction Industry." M.S. Dissertation, Department of Construction Management, Hanyang University, pp. 1-4.
10 Kim, J.G., Jung, J.H., and Lee, H.K. (2009). "The Corresponding Plan of Construction Enterprise for the Introduction of CM at Risk." Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, Architectural Institute of Korea, 11(1), pp. 159-166.
11 Koo, S.K. (2017). "Risk Factor Assessment for Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract in CM at Risk." M.S. Dissertation, Graduate School, University of Seoul, pp. 1-94.
12 Lee, S.H., and Ahn, Y.H. (2016). "Valuing the Guaranteed Maximum Price(GMP) Contract of the Cm at Risk." AIK 2016 Proceeding, Architectural Institute of Korea, 36(2), pp. 1054-1055.
13 Son, K.N. (2018). "Importance analysis of obstacle factors on the Cm at Risk project using AHP method." M.S Dissertation, Department of Construction Management, Hanyang University, pp. 1-78.
14 Lee, I.H. (2008). "A Study on Application Plan of Separate Procurement Concept through CM at Risk." M.S. Dissertation, International School of Urban Science, University of Seoul, pp. 10-13.
15 Matt, F., Scott, G., and Caroline, M. (2015). "Benefits of Owner mandated CM/GC Contract Amendment Templates." Journal of Facilities Management, Heads of Facilites and Corporate Real Estate, 13(3), pp. 282-296.
16 Ministry of Land infrastructure and Transport (Molit). (2011). "Framework Act on the Construction Industry." (Aug, 20, 2018).
17 Park, K.M., and Kim, C.D. (2016). "Improvement through Analysis of Current Open Book Policy for the Korean CM at Risk." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 17(2), pp. 3-11.   DOI
18 Seo, S.J., Kim, Y.H., Lyu, H.S., and Chung, J.B. (2011). "The Establishment and Operation of the National Public Architecture Center." Reserach Report, Architecture and Urban Research Institute, pp. 22-41.
19 Song, B.K., and Kim, H.S. (2001). "Understanding of Cm at Risk and Major Implication." Construction Trend Briefing, 2001, pp. 2-15.
20 Yoo, S.K., Choi, S.I., and Son, C.B. (2009). "An Analysis of Capability of CM at Risk in Major Construction Company." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(5), pp. 85-94.
21 AGC of America (2011). Recommended Best Practices for the Use of Construction Management/General Contractor on Highway and Transportation Projects in the Public Sector, 1-5, Retrieved July 24, 2018 from .