Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.4.89

Development of Performance Indicators for Asset Management in Public Facilities  

Kwon, Bang-Sung ((주)휴다임건축사사무소)
Hong, Tae-Hoon (연세대학교 건축공학과)
Hyun, Chang-Taek (서울시립대학교 건축학부)
Chae, Myung-Jin (한국건설기술연구원)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.11, no.4, 2010 , pp. 89-99 More about this Journal
Abstract
In Korea, much effort is being made to introduce asset management for improved efficiency and lower costs. Many researches related to asset management are ongoing, but asset management for public facilities is still in its early development stage in many countries including Korea. It is necessary to continuously improve and complement asset management for its successful execution. Thus, there should be a series of performance measurements and evaluations to perceive the current state of asset management in Korea from which to set future goals. In developed countries including Australia, asset management performance is measured using various methods for diverse purposes. The Korea Institute of Construction Technology has recently launched a study entitled Development of an Asset Management System for Public Facilities (KTAM-40) to change the country’s existing countermeasure-type maintenance system into a preliminary maintenance system and to suggest asset management evaluation parameters. this study aims to develop performance indicators of effective asset management with respect to its utility, which shall include all matters that are important for the efficient measurement of the management of domestic public facilities using the BSC (Balanced Score Card) method, and AHP method.
Keywords
Public Facilities; Asset Management; BSC; Performance Measurement; Performance Indicators;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 한국건설기술연구원 (2006), "공공시설물 내구성 증대를 위한 유지관리비용 산정 시스템 개발", 한국건설교통기술평가원,p. 71, p. 208
2 Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (1992), "The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance", Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb pp. 71-79
3 Olson, E. M., Slater S. F. (2002)," The balanced scorecard, competitive strategy, and performance", Bus. Horizons, 45(3), pp. 11-16   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Asset Management Council (2008), Asset Management Excellence Awards Brochure, pp. 2-4
5 Kohler, P., 2001," Self Assessment Tool", South Australian Councils
6 손명호외(2003)," 기업 수명주기에 따른 균형성과표 성과지표가중치 비교분석", 한국경영과학회지, 제28권 제1호, pp.79-95   과학기술학회마을
7 신희철 (2006), 도로교통시설 자산관리시스템 구축을 위한 기초 연구, 한국교통연구원, p. 11
8 최동득 외 (2004), 알기쉬운 BSC, KOMIT 출판사, pp. 29-30
9 하재도 (2003), 정부투자기관의 BSC를 활용한 전략적 성과평가 연구, 서울대학교 석사학위논문, pp. 28-29