Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.2.3

Feasibility Analysis of Introducing CM at Risk Delivery Method to the Korean Public Construction Industry by Analyzing Attributes of the Projects  

Koh, Min-Hyeok (성균관대학교 건설환경시스템공학과)
Kim, Yea-Sang (성균관대학교 건축공학과)
Kwon, Soon-Wook (성균관대학교 건축공학과)
Chin, Sang-Yoon (성균관대학교 건축공학과)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.11, no.2, 2010 , pp. 3-14 More about this Journal
Abstract
A high degree of management skills and functions is essential to the success of construction projects. While the various construction management delivery methods have been realized as the solutions, Korean government is planning to introduce 'CM at Risk Method' to the public construction projects. However, even if its effect has been verified successful in the international market, it must be considered before legally adapting the method that it would be suitable to our public sector, In this respect, the purpose of this study is to evaluate and analyze feasibility of 'CM at Risk Method'. In order to do that, 15 attributes of construction projects were found, which were suitable to 'CM at Risk Method' in general, 'CM at Risk-GMP Method', and 'CM at Risk-Cost Reimbursable Method' and suitability of each attribute to each of 9 categories of public construction facilities was evaluated by questionnaire survey to CM specialists. Results showed that 'CM at Risk Method' might not bring improper effect to the industry but due to the characteristic of public sector, the effect would be very limited.
Keywords
CM at Risk Method; CM at Risk-GMP Method; CM at Bisk-Cost Reimbursable Method; Attribute of Construction projects;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 장철기 (2006). "미국 CM at Risk 시장 동향 및 시사점." 건설관리, 한국건설관리학회 학술발표대회 논문집, pp. 1-11.
2 건설기술 . 건축문화선진화기획단 (2007). 사업특성에 적합한 다양한 발주방식 시범적용에 관한 연구, 용역보고서, 한국건설관리학회.
3 산성훈, 서용철, 구교진, 현창택 (2003). "CM at Risk의 국내 건설시장 도입 및 활성화 방안 연구.", 제23권 제1호, 대한건축춘계학술발표대회논문집(구조계), pp.343-346.
4 김흥수, 손병관 (2001). "CM at Risk의 이해와 주요시사점.", 건설산업연구원.
5 최석인, 이복남 (2008. 04). "공공부문의 . CM . at . Risk . 도입방식 . 검토와 . 정책적 . 제언." 건설관리, 제9권 제2호, 한국건설관리학회, pp. 25-29.
6 김예상 (2008). 건설제도 및 계약, 보문당, 서울.
7 국가통계포털, 통계청, (http://www.kosis.kr).
8 장철기, 이복남, 최석인, 이덕규 (2006). "CM at Risk의 이해와 도입가능성 진단.", 한국건설산업연구원, 연구보고서.
9 권오경 (2008). "갈길 먼 CM at Risk.", 특집 CM at Risk, 제9권 제3호, 한국건설관리학회, pp. 9
10 최규산, 이호경, 박영호, 백준홍 (2003). "대형할인점 리모델링 프로젝트의 CM at Risk 적용 타당성 관한 연구.", 제23권 제2호, 대한건축학회 추계학술발표대회 논문집(구조계), pp. 527-530.
11 전재열 (2005). "건설사업 선진화를 위한 발주자 중심의 CM at Risk 도입 방안." 건설관리, 제6권 제3호, 한국건설관리학회, pp. 19-23.