Browse > Article

A Benchmarking Study on CM Fee Estimation  

Kim, Sang-Bum (동국대학교 사회환경시스템공학과)
Lee, Jeong-Dae (동국대학교 사회환경시스템공학과)
Kim, Jae-Wook (동국대학교 사회환경시스템공학과)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.9, no.1, 2008 , pp. 96-106 More about this Journal
Abstract
The Korean Construction Industry significantly contributed to the Korean economic development not only by preparing the domestic infrastructure but also by successfully conducting various international projects. However, major incidents such as the collapse of Sung-Su Bridge and Sam-Pung Department Store along with stagnation of Korean Economy have raised questions about underlying systematic problems of the Korean Construction Industry. As a solution to resurrect the Korean Construction Industry, the Construction Management (CM) system introduced in late 1990's and increasingly utilized as an innovative delivery system. Despite of the fast growth of CM, the performance of CM has not been up to the hype and low CM fee has been identified as one of the main reasons of unsatisfactory CM performance. Therefore, this research attempted to propose ways of improving 'CM Fee Guidelines' published by Korean Ministry of Construction and Transportation by conducting a benchmarking study on Global Standards of estimating CM Fee. International organizations benchmarked in this research include CMAA, ASCE, DOL, DOE, etc. Various investigation and analysis revealed that Korean 'CM Fee Guidelines' need to significantly modified comparing to Global Standards. This research also tried to prepare recommendations to improve the CM deliver system focusing on the 'Method of CM Fee Estimation' and Selection of a CM firm as an owner's agent.
Keywords
CM Fee Guidelines; Benchmarking; Cost Plust Fixed Fee;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김철웅 외 (2002),'설계 VE 용역대가 산정방안에 관한 연구', 한국건설관리학회 논문집, 제3권 1호
2 이복남 외 (2005), '국내 용역형 CM/PM 시장 활성화를 위한 개선방안', 한국건설산업연구원. p 66
3 한미파슨스 (2006), Construction Management A to Z, 보문당, 서울, pp.24
4 AIA Document A131/CMc and AGC Document 566 (1991), Owner/CM Agreement (CM is Constructor, Cost Plus, No GMP)
5 ASCE. (2007) The Engineering Income & Salary Survey
6 CMAA. (2007), 2007 Comparison of Construction Management and Program Management Costs
7 CMAA. (2006) 2006 Fee & Billing Survey
8 CMR (2007), Salary Survey, Construction Manager
9 DOL. (2007) Bureau of Labor Statistics,
10 기준호 외 (2000),'건설사업관리 대가 산출모델의 방향 설 정에 관한 연구', 한국건설관리학회 논문집, 제1권 4호
11 이재섭 (2006),'CM의 역할과 과제', 대한토목학회
12 건설교통부 (2005). 건설사업대가기준, 건설교통부고시 제 2005 - 447호
13 건설교통부 (2001), 건설사업관리자 사업수행능력평가 세부기준(안)
14 이복남 외 (2001),'건설사업관리 비용 산정', 연구보고서 2001-09, 한국건설산업연구원, 2001년
15 이상호 (2001), '건설생산체계 개편을 위한 정책과제와 방향', 건설산업동향, 2001-31, 한국건설산업연구원
16 한국개발연구원/한국건설산업연구원 (2001), '총사업비 관리제도 개선방안 연구'
17 DOE. (1989), Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation
18 유병기 외 (2006), 'CM 대가 산정방식의 문제점 분석에 대한 연구', 한국건설관리학회논문집 제7권 제 6호   과학기술학회마을
19 한국건설산업연구원, '국내 CM제도 개선 무엇이 문제인가', 건설동향브리핑, 제3호. 2001. 10. 16
20 우성권 외 (2001), 건설사업관리(CM) 제도 현황과 발전방향, 한국건설산업연구원
21 ASCE, CoGSA, Construction Excellence; Special Report, Consulting Engineering: A guide for the engagement of engineering services - Rev. Ed
22 ASCE (1996). Consulting Engineering : A guide for the engagement of engineering services., ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practices No. 45
23 한국건설산업연구원 (2007), 한국건설산업의 성공키워드, 보성각, 서울
24 김상범 (2005), '엔지니어링 입∙낙찰제도 개선방안 연구 최종보고서-해외 제도/사례 분석을 통한 Global Standard 도출 연구', 동국대학교
25 CMAA (1993, 2000), Construction Management Costs Survey
26 Donald S. Barrie, Boyd C. Paulson (１９９２）, Professional Construction Management, 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill, pp.167
27 조훈희 (2007),'건설사업관리 대가체계 개선을 위한 공청회', 한국건설관리학회, pp.7
28 건설교통부 (2001), 건설사업관리(CM)제도 운영방안', 한국CM협회 발표자료
29 AIA Document A121/CMc and AGC Document 565 (1991), Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manger
30 유진근 외 (2001), 건설업역 구조변화에 관한 연구, 연구보고서 2001-03, 한국건설산업연구원