Browse > Article

Conflicting Factors in Korean Construction Industry  

Acharya Nirmal K. (Dept. of Civil Engg, Pukyong National Univ.)
Lee, Young-Dai (Dept. of Civil Eng, Pukyong National Univ.)
Kim, Jung-Ki (Dept. of Civil Eng, Pukyong National Univ.)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.7, no.2, 2006 , pp. 171-180 More about this Journal
Abstract
Change is inevitable and is a reality of construction projects. Most construction contracts include change clauses and allowing contractors an equitable adjustment to the contract price and duration caused by change. However, the actions of a contractor can cause a loss of productivity and furthermore can result in disruption of the whole project because of a cumulative or ripple effect. Because of its complicated nature, it becomes a complex issue to determine the cumulative impact (ripple effect) caused by single or multiple change orders. Furthermore, owners and contractors do not always agree on the adjusted contract price for the cumulative impact of the changes. A number of studies have attempted to quantify the impact of change orders on project costs and schedule. Many of these attempted to develop regression models to quantify the loss. However, regression analysis has shortcomings in dealing with many qualitative or noisy input data. This study develops ANN models to classify and quantify the labor productivity losses that are caused by the cumulative impact of change orders. The results show that ANN models give significantly improved performance compared to traditional statistical models.
Keywords
Construction Projects; Conflicting Factors; Disputes; Successful Project; Korea;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Fenn, P., Lowe, D. and Speck, C. (1997), 'Conflict and dispute in construction,' Construction Management and Economics, (T & F Spon), Vol. 15 (6), 513-518   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Hyperstat Online (2005), 'Chapter 12 Introduction to ANOVA,' (June 27, 2005)
3 O'Brien, J. J. (1998), 'Construction Change Orders: impact, avoidance, documentation,' McGraw ? Hill
4 Pezzullo, J.C. (2005), http://Pezzullo.net
5 McCallum, M.H., (2000), 'A quick premier on construction risks and contracting practices', Associated general contractors of America (AGC), USA
6 Epstein, R.C. (2004), 'How construction contracts cause litigation', Alert, Greenberg Traurig, USA (February), http://www.gtlaw.com/pub/alerts/2004/epsteinr_02.pdf (retrieved on July 4, 2005)
7 'South Korean construction posts solid growth work in 2003,' (2004), Asia Pulse Yahoo Inc., (August 18), http://au.news.yahoo.com/040818/3/qdcv.html>
8 Stipanowich, T.J., and Matthews, W.L. (1997), 'At the cutting edge: conflict avoidance and resolution in the US construction industry,' Construction. Management and Economics, Vol. 15 (6), 505-512   DOI
9 Levy, S.M. (2000), Project management in construction, (3rd Ed.) McGraw-Hill
10 Fisk, E.R. (2000), Construction project administration, (6th Ed.), Prentice - Hall
11 Green Korea-Save Saemangeum (2005), 'Letter to President Roh,' (July 7, 2005)
12 Long, N.D., Ogunlana, S., Quang, T., and Lam, K.C. (2004), 'Large construction projects in developing countries: a case study from Vietnam,' International Journal of Project Management, (Elsevier), Vol. 22 (7), 553-561   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Chan, E.H.W., and Suen, C.H. (2005), 'Disputes and dispute resolution systems in Sino-foreign joint venture construction projects in China,' Journal of Professional Issues and Engineering Education and Practice (ASCE), Vol. 131 (2), 141-148   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kim, Y.B. (2003), 'To get what you want, push the government around,' The Korea Economic Daily, Vol. 29, No.829
15 Awakul, P., and Ogunlana, S.O., (2002), 'The effect of attitudinal differences on interface conflicts in large scale construction projects: a case study,' Construction Management and Economics, (T & F Spon), Vol. 20 (4), 365-377   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Kartam, N.A. and Kartam, S.A. (2001). 'Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: a contractors' perspective,' International Journal of Project Management, Vol.19 (6), 325-335   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Barrie, D.S. and Paulson, B. C. Jr. (1992), Professional Construction Management (3rd Ed.), McGraw-Hill Inc
18 Breen, M. (2004), 'Korea's protest culture,' Invest Korea Journal, Nov-Dec
19 Fenn, P. (2002), 'Why construction contracts go wrong (or an aetiological approach to construction disputes)', A paper given at a meeting of the society of construction law in Derbyshire on 5th March 2002), Society of construction law, www.scl.org.uk
20 Cho, Y. (2003), 'The organizational boundaries of housebuilding firms in Korea,' Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 21 (7), 671-680   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Ogleysby, C.H., Parker, H., and Howell, G. (1989), 'Productivity improvement in construction', McGraw-Hill Inc
22 Rahman, M.M. and Kumaraswamy, M.M. (2004). 'Contracting Relationship trends and Transitions,' Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 20 (4), 147-161   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Loosemore, M. (1999), 'Responsibility, power and construction conflict', Construction management and economics, Vol. 17, pp. 699-709   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Gardiner, P.D., and Simmons, J.E.L., (1998). 'Conflict in smalland medium-sized projects: Case of partnering to the rescue,' Journal of management in engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp 35-40   DOI   ScienceOn