Browse > Article

The Maintenance Performance Evaluation Dynamic Model for Apartment Buildings  

Kim, Tae-Hui (서원대 건축학과)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management / v.6, no.5, 2005 , pp. 78-88 More about this Journal
Abstract
Given the trend of increased apartment buildings and high-rise buildings, the maintenance of apartment buildings has been set a higher value. For this reason, a total performance evaluation model of the existing buildings has recently been developed. But, it has a lack of the management work analysis. The purpose of this study, therefore, is the management work analysis for items selection of maintenance performance evaluation of apartment buildings. Candidate items of Maintenance performance evaluation was made with the existing literature and business system analysis. Easy systemicity of performance evaluation supplemented doing question to academic experts and housing managers. Finally decided maintenance performance evaluation items are to classify 14 administrative and 15 technical items.
Keywords
Apartment buildings; Maintenance; Performance evaluation; Dynamic model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 한국건설기술연구원(1993), 기존 건축물의 유지관리 지침개발, 건설교통부
2 Finch, E.F.(1992), Evaluation of New Building Technology, Discussion Paper, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.118, No.1   DOI
3 Kevin Yu et al.(2000), A development framework for data models for computer-integrated facilities management, Automation in Construction, pp.145-167
4 이원준 외 (2002), 주택관리실무, 경록
5 Sharif, N., and Sundarajan, V.(1983), A Quantitative Model for the Evaluation of Technological Alternatives,Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.24, pp.15-29   DOI   ScienceOn
6 M.A. Hassanain et al.(2001), Development of a maintenance management model based on IAI standard, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering,pp.177-193
7 김인호(1998), 건설계획과 의사결정, 기문당, p.381
8 Aczel, J. and Saaty, T.L.(1983), Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27(1), pp. 99-102
9 김태희 외(2004), 공동주택의 유지관리 성능평가를 위한 업무분석, 한국건설관리학회논문집 제5권 제6호, pp.118-128
10 Saaty, T. L.(1988), Multicriteria Decision-Making- The Analytic Hierarchy Process, University of Pittsburgh, PA
11 Lutz, J.D., and Chang, L.(1990), Evaluation of New Building Technology, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.116, No.2
12 Saaty, T. L.(1977), A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology , Vol.15, pp.234-281   DOI
13 한국시설안전기술공단 외(2002), 기존 건축물의 종합성능 평가모델 개발, 건설교통부
14 S. Martorell et al.(1999), The use of maintenance indicators to evaluate the effects of maintenance programs on NPP performance and safety, Reliability Engineering and System safety, pp.85-94
15 건설교통부(2003), 공동주택 안전 및 유지관리 제도개선 세미나, 건설교통부 안전기획단, 공동주택유지관리연구회, p.4
16 김재연(1998), 컴퓨터 시뮬레이션, 박영사, p.10
17 Saaty, T. L.(1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York : McGraw-Hill
18 Saaty, T. L.(1995), Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publications
19 Vargas, L.G.(1982), Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients, Mathematical Modelling, 3, pp.69-81 Abstract   DOI   ScienceOn