Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.3.209

Functional outcomes in children with reduction glossectomy for vascular malformations - "less is more!"  

Thomas, John K. (Department of Paediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College)
Gaikwad, Vivek Samuel (Department of Paediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College)
Babu, Telugu Ramesh (Department of Pathology, Christian Medical College)
Mathai, John (Department of Paediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College)
Srinivas, Rohit (Department of Paediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College)
Karl, Immanuel Sampath (Department of Paediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.47, no.3, 2021 , pp. 209-215 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: Vascular malformation (VM) of the tongue can cause true macroglossia in children. Reduction glossectomy provides primary relief when sclerotherapy has failed or is not possible. In this study, we evaluated the surgical role in functional outcome of reduction glossectomy performed for VM of the tongue. Patients and Methods: We evaluated the functional and surgical outcomes of seven children who were treated at a tertiary care centre in Southern India between 2013 and 2018. Results: Six children underwent median glossectomy, while one child underwent lateral glossectomy. Functional assessment was performed at least 2 years after the date of surgery. At the time of assessment, speech was comprehensible for three children and was occasionally unintelligible in four children. Taste and swallowing were normal in all seven children. Six children exhibited a minimal residual lesion after surgery, of which only one was symptomatic. Residual lesions were managed with sclerotherapy (n=3), observation (n=2), or repeat surgery (n=1). Conclusion: Reduction glossectomy in children with macroglossia secondary to VMs has acceptable outcomes in terms of cosmesis and speech, with no gastronomic restriction.
Keywords
Macroglossia; Glossectomy; Vascular malformation; Treatment outcome; Sclerotherapy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Halczy-Kowalik L, Wiktor A, Rzewuska A, Kowalczyk R, Wysocki R, Posio V. Compensatory mechanisms in patients after a partial or total glossectomy due to oral cancer. Dysphagia 2015;30:738-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9652-z   DOI
2 Hall JE. Pocket companion to Guyton and Hall textbook of medical physiology. 12th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders/Elsevier; 2012:1091.
3 Barrett KE, Barman SM, Boitano S, Brooks H. Ganong's review of medical physiology. 24th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012:764.
4 Elhalaby EE, Hassan HS, Almetaher HA. Reduction glossectomy for macroglossia in children. Ann Pediatr Surg 2015;11:115-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XPS.0000462929.45595.1a   DOI
5 Dzioba A, Aalto D, Papadopoulos-Nydam G, Seikaly H, Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, et al.; Head and Neck Research Network. Functional and quality of life outcomes after partial glossectomy: a multi-institutional longitudinal study of the head and neck research network. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;46:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0234-y   DOI
6 Walker WA, Goulet O, Kleinman RE, Sherman PM, Schneider BL, Sanderson IR. Pediatric gastrointestinal disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management. 4th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2004:1158.
7 Myer CM 3rd, Hotaling AJ, Reilly JS. The diagnosis and treatment of macroglossia in children. Ear Nose Throat J 1986;65:444-8.
8 Balaji SM. Reduction glossectomy for large tongues. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2013;3:167-72. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.119230   DOI
9 Vogel JE, Mulliken JB, Kaban LB. Macroglossia: a review of the condition and a new classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:715-23.   DOI
10 Bell DJ, Gaillard F. ISSVA classification of vascular anomalies [Internet]. Kew: Radiopaedia [cited 2020 Sep 7]. Available from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/issva-classification-of-vascular-anomalies
11 Vlachou E, Dalal M, Monaghan A, Nishikawa H. Acute exacerbation of macroglossia. Br J Plast Surg 2005;58:877-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2004.12.010   DOI
12 Wiegand S, Eivazi B, Zimmermann AP, Neff A, Barth PJ, Sesterhenn AM, et al. Microcystic lymphatic malformations of the tongue: diagnosis, classification, and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:976-83. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2009.131   DOI
13 Curry S, Logeman A, Jones D. Sirolimus: a successful medical treatment for head and neck lymphatic malformations. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2019;2019:2076798. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2076798   DOI
14 Khadilkar V, Khadilkar AV, Kajale N. Indian growth references from 0-18-year-old children and adolescents - a comparison of two methods. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2019;23:635-44. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_555_19   DOI
15 Lahiri A, Kok K, Sharp I, Nishikawa H. Acute exacerbation of macroglossia leading to necrosis of the anterior third of the tongue. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:871-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.005   DOI
16 Adams DM, Trenor CC 3rd, Hammill AM, Vinks AA, Patel MN, Chaudry G, et al. Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in the treatment of complicated vascular anomalies. Pediatrics 2016;137:e20153257.   DOI
17 Hammer J, Seront E, Duez S, Dupont S, Van Damme A, Schmitz S, et al. Sirolimus is efficacious in treatment for extensive and/or complex slow-flow vascular malformations: a monocentric prospective phase II study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2018;13:191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0934-z   DOI
18 Lee BB. Sirolimus in the treatment of vascular anomalies. J Vasc Surg 2020;71:328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.246   DOI
19 Morgan WE, Friedman EM, Duncan NO, Sulek M. Surgical management of macroglossia in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:326-9.   DOI
20 Davalbhakta A, Lamberty BG. Technique for uniform reduction of macroglossia. Br J Plast Surg 2000;53:294-7. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1999.3311   DOI
21 Chung IH, Song SI, Kim ES. Central tongue reduction for macroglossia. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;29:191-4.
22 Kole H. Results, experience, and problems in the operative treatment of anomalies with reverse overbite (mandibular protrusion). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;19:427-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90002-2   DOI
23 Myers EN. Operative otolaryngology: head and neck surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier; 2008:161-7.
24 Bjuggren G, Jensen R, Strombeck JO. Macroglossia and its surgical treatment. Indications and postoperative experiences from the orthodontic, phoniatric, and surgical points of view. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;2:116-24. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316809010493   DOI
25 Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1516-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.049   DOI
26 Melville JC, Menegotto KD, Woernley TC, Maida BD, Alava I 3rd. Unusual case of a massive macroglossia secondary to myxedema: a case report and literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:119-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.033   DOI
27 Henningsson G, Kuehn DP, Sell D, Sweeney T, Trost-Cardamone JE, Whitehill TL; Speech Parameters Group. Universal parameters for reporting speech outcomes in individuals with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008;45:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1597/06-086.1   DOI