Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.409

Alveolar cleft bone grafting: factors affecting case prognosis  

Mahardawi, Basel (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University)
Boonsiriseth, Kiatanant (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University)
Pairuchvej, Verasak (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University)
Wongsirichat, Natthamet (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.46, no.6, 2020 , pp. 409-416 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the significance and impact of several factors on the alveolar cleft bone grafting procedure. Materials and Methods: The medical records were reviewed. In addition, x-rays were checked. The size of every cleft was measured in this retrospective study. The analyzed factors included sex, age, type of cleft, size of the cleft, and the type of flap used in surgery. The patients were characterized into group A (no complications, Bergland scale 1 or 2), group B (complications or Bergland scale 3), or group C (failure cases). Statistical analysis was performed with a P-value set at 0.05. Results: There were 32 cases in group A, 26 in group B, and 9 in group C. Multinomial logistic regression showed an association between the type of the cleft and the size of the cleft, with the presence of complications, or achieving type 3 on the Bergland scale, with odds ratios of 5.118 and 6.000, respectively. The type of cleft was related to failure with an odds ratio of 4.833. Given a small sample, statistical analysis could not be performed to evaluate the relationship between the size of the cleft and group C. Age, sex, and the type of the flap were not significant factors. Conclusion: The cleft size of more than 10 mm and bilateral clefts were listed regarding their effect on the procedure. Clinicians should not overlook these factors. In addition, patients must be informed of any risks that are present.
Keywords
Alveolar cleft; Bilateral cleft; Cleft size; Patient's age;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rachmiel A, Emodi O, Aizenbud D, Rachmiel D, Shilo D. Twostage reconstruction of the severely deficient alveolar ridge: bone graft followed by alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47:117-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.007   DOI
2 Sun J, Zhang X, Li R, Chen Z, Huang Y, Chen Z. Biological effects of orthodontic tooth movement into the grafted alveolar cleft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:605-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.029   DOI
3 Nystrom E, Kahnberg KE, Gunne J. Bone grafts and Brånemark implants in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:45-53.
4 Jensen OT. Alveolar segmental "sandwich" osteotomies for posterior edentulous mandibular sites for dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:471-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.030   DOI
5 Jensen OT, Greer RO Jr, Johnson L, Kassebaum D. Vertical guided bone-graft augmentation in a new canine mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:335-44.
6 Elhaddaoui R, Bahije L, Zaoui F, Rerhrhaye W. [Timing of alveolar bone graft and sequences of canine eruption in cases of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review]. Orthod Fr 2017;88:193-8. French. https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2017011   DOI
7 Kamal M, Ziyab AH, Bartella A, Mitchell D, Al-Asfour A, Hölzle F, et al. Volumetric comparison of autogenous bone and tissue-engineered bone replacement materials in alveolar cleft repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;56:453-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.05.007   DOI
8 von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. The TIME technique: a new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:387-94.
9 Kang NH. Current methods for the treatment of alveolar cleft. Arch Plast Surg 2017;44:188-93. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.188   DOI
10 Van der Meij AJ, Baart JA, Prahl-Andersen B, Valk J, Kostense PJ, Tuinzing DB. Bone volume after secondary bone grafting in unilateral and bilateral clefts determined by computed tomography scans. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:136-41. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.115274   DOI
11 Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:175-205.
12 Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W, Rothamel D, Kloss F, Blessmann M, et al. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials - from space holders to innovative biomaterials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:706-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.002   DOI
13 Bajaj AK, Wongworawat AA, Punjabi A. Management of alveolar clefts. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:840-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200311000-00005   DOI
14 Troxell JB, Fonseca RJ, Osbon DB. A retrospective study of alveolar cleft grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1982;40:721-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(82)90145-8   DOI
15 Cohen M, Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Secondary (intermediate) alveolar bone grafting. Clin Plast Surg 1993;20:691-705.   DOI
16 Hammoudeh JA, Fahradyan A, Gould DJ, Liang F, Imahiyerobo T, Urbinelli L, et al. A comparative analysis of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with a demineralized bone matrix versus iliac crest bone graft for secondary alveolar bone grafts in patients with cleft lip and palate: review of 501 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:318e-25e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003519   DOI
17 Freitas JA, das Neves LT, de Almeida AL, Garib DG, Trindade-Suedam IK, Yaedu RY, et al. Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies/USP (HRAC/USP)--part 1: overall aspects. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000100003   DOI
18 Arctander K, Kolbenstvedt A, Aalokken TM, Abyholm F, Froslie KF. Computed tomography of alveolar bone grafts 20 years after repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2005;39:11-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310410021749   DOI
19 Jia YL, James DR, Mars M. Bilateral alveolar bone grafting: a report of 55 consecutively-treated patients. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:299-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/20.3.299   DOI
20 El Deeb M, Messer LB, Lehnert MW, Hebda TW, Waite DE. Canine eruption into grafted bone in maxillary alveolar cleft defects. Cleft Palate J 1982;19:9-16.
21 Murthy AS, Lehman JA. Secondary alveolar bone grafting: an outcome analysis. Can J Plast Surg 2006;14:172-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/229255030601400307   DOI
22 Khodayari A, Khojasteh A, Kiani M, Nayebi A, Mehrdad L, Vahdatinia M. Spontaneous regeneration of the mandible after hemimandibulectomy: report of a case. J Dent (Tehran) 2011;8:152-6.   DOI
23 Lim HK, Kim JW, Lee UL, Kim JW, Lee H. Risk factor analysis of graft failure with concomitant cyst enucleation of the jaw bone: a retrospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:1668-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.003   DOI
24 Zuo W, Sun W, Zhao D, Gao F, Su Y, Li Z. Investigating clinical failure of bone grafting through a window at the femoral head neck junction surgery for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. PLoS One 2016;11:e0156903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156903   DOI
25 Horowitz I, Bodner L. Use of xenograft bone with aspirated bone marrow for treatment of cystic defect of the jaws. Head Neck 1989;11:516-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2880110608   DOI
26 Chen GC, Sun M, Yin NB, Li HD. A novel method to calculate the volume of alveolar cleft defect before surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:342-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004181   DOI
27 Souza J, Raskin S. Clinical and epidemiological study of orofacial clefts. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2013;89:137-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2013.03.010   DOI
28 Emeka CI, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Butali A. A comparative study of quality of life of families with children born with cleft lip and/or palate before and after surgical treatment. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;43:247-55. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.4.247   DOI
29 Schutte BC, Murray JC. The many faces and factors of orofacial clefts. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8:1853-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.10.1853   DOI
30 Wu C, Pan W, Feng C, Su Z, Duan Z, Zheng Q, et al. Grafting materials for alveolar cleft reconstruction: a systematic review and best-evidence synthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47:345-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.003   DOI
31 Khojasteh A, Kheiri L, Behnia H, Tehranchi A, Nazeman P, Nadjmi N, et al. Lateral ramus cortical bone plate in alveolar cleft osteoplasty with concomitant use of buccal fat pad derived cells and autogenous bone: phase I clinical trial. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:6560234. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6560234
32 Aly LA, Hammouda N. Secondary closure of alveolar cleft with resorbable collagen membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2016;6:165-71. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.200351   DOI
33 Kaura AS, Srinivasa DR, Kasten SJ. Optimal timing of alveolar cleft bone grafting for maxillary clefts in the cleft palate population. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:1551-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004680   DOI
34 Shirzadeh A, Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. A prospective study of chin bone graft harvesting for unilateral maxillary alveolar cleft during mixed dentition. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:180-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.07.143   DOI