Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.5.276

The effect of fixation plate use on bone healing during the reconstruction of mandibular defects  

Hong, Khang Do Gia (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Kim, Seong-Gon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Park, Young-Wook (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.45, no.5, 2019 , pp. 276-284 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to compare efficiency results between the use of a customized implant (CI) and a reconstruction plate (RP) in mandibular defect reconstruction in an animal model. Materials and Methods: Fifteen rabbits underwent surgery to create a defect in the right side of the mandible and were randomly divided into two groups. For reconstruction of the mandibular defect, the RP group (n=5) received five-hole mini-plates without bone grafting and the CI group (n=10) received fabricated CIs based on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data taken preoperatively. The CI group was further divided into two subgroups depending on the time of CBCT performance preoperatively, as follows: a six-week CI (6WCI) group (n=5) and a one-week CI (1WCI) group (n=5). Daily food intake amount (DFIA) was measured to assess the recovery rate. Radiographic images were acquired to evaluate screw quantity. CBCT and histological examination were performed in the CI subgroup after sacrifice. Results: The 1WCI group showed the highest value in peak average recovery rate and the fastest average recovery rate. In terms of reaching a 50% recovery rate, the 1WCI group required the least number of days as compared with the other groups ($2.6{\pm}1.3days$), while the RP group required the least number of days to reach an 80% recovery rate ($7.8{\pm}2.2days$). The 1WCI group showed the highest percentage of intact screws (94.3%). New bone formation was observed in the CI group during histological examination. Conclusion: Rabbits with mandibular defects treated with CI showed higher and faster recovery rates and more favorable screw status as compared with those treated with a five-hole mini-plate without bone graft.
Keywords
Mandibular reconstruction; Mandibular defect; 3D printing; Customized implant; Reconstruction plate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Standring S. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
2 Genden EM, Kessler SM. Reconstruction of the head and neck: a defect-oriented approach. New York: Thieme; 2012.
3 Rachmiel A, Shilo D, Blanc O, Emodi O. Reconstruction of complex mandibular defects using integrated dental custom-made titanium implants. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;55:425-7.   DOI
4 Millard DR Jr, Deane M, Garst WP. Bending an iliac bone graft for anterior mandibular arch repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971;48:600-2.   DOI
5 Blocker TG Jr, Stout RA. Mandibular reconstruction, World War II. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1949;4:153-6.   DOI
6 Ostrup LT, Fredrickson JM. Reconstruction of mandibular defects after radiation, using a free, living bone graft transferred by microvascular anastomose. An experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975;55:563-72.   DOI
7 Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:71-9.   DOI
8 Kim JW, Hwang JH, Ahn KM. Fibular flap for mandible reconstruction in osteoradionecrosis of the jaw: selection criteria of fibula flap. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;38:46.   DOI
9 Goh BT, Lee S, Tideman H, Stoelinga PJ. Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:597-605.   DOI
10 Mucke T, Muller AA, Kansy K, Hallermann W, Kerkmann H, Schuck N, et al. Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck--Current practice of maxillofacial units in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011;39:449-52.   DOI
11 Chow JM, Hill JH. Primary mandibular reconstruction using the AO reconstruction plate. Laryngoscope 1986;96:768-73.
12 Saunders JR Jr, Hirata RM, Jaques DA. Definitive mandibular replacement using reconstruction plates. Am J Surg 1990;160:387-9.   DOI
13 Yu Y, Zhang WB, Liu XJ, Guo CB, Yu GY, Peng X. Three-dimensional accuracy of virtual planning and surgical navigation for mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:1503.e1-10.
14 Wei FC, Celik N, Yang WG, Chen IH, Chang YM, Chen HC. Complications after reconstruction by plate and soft-tissue free flap in composite mandibular defects and secondary salvage reconstruction with osteocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:37-42.   DOI
15 Arden RL, Rachel JD, Marks SC, Dang K. Volume-length impact of lateral jaw resections on complication rates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:68-72.   DOI
16 Spencer KR, Sizeland A, Taylor GI, Wiesenfeld D. The use of titanium mandibular reconstruction plates in patients with oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:288-90.   DOI
17 Rotaru H, Stan H, Florian IS, Schumacher R, Park YT, Kim SG, et al. Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:e169-76.   DOI
18 Lee UL, Kwon JS, Woo SH, Choi YJ. Simultaneous bimaxillary surgery and mandibular reconstruction with a 3-dimensional printed titanium implant fabricated by electron beam melting: a preliminary mechanical testing of the printed mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:1501.e1-15.
19 Cheng G, Li Z, Wan Q, Lv K, Li D, Xing X, et al. A novel animal model treated with tooth extraction to repair the full-thickness defects in the mandible of rabbits. J Surg Res 2015;194:706-16.   DOI
20 Chung SM, Jung IK, Yoon BH, Choi BR, Kim DM, Jang JS. Evaluation of different combinations of biphasic calcium phosphate and growth factors for bone formation in calvarial defects in a rabbit model. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016;36 Suppl:s49-59.
21 Chae MP, Smoll NR, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. Establishing the natural history and growth rate of ameloblastoma with implications for management: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117241.   DOI
22 Grunheid T, Brugman P, Zentner A, Langenbach GE. Changes in rabbit jaw-muscle activity parameters in response to reduced masticatory load. J Exp Biol 2010;213:775-81.   DOI
23 Moon YM, Kim YJ, Kim MK, Kim SG, Kweon H, Kim TW. Early effect of Botox-A injection into the masseter muscle of rats: functional and histological evaluation. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;37:46.   DOI
24 Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 2015;219:521-9.   DOI
25 Ishida T, Soma K, Miura F. [Stress distribution in mandible induced by occlusal force in different horizontal mandibular positions]. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1988;47:767-79. Japanese.
26 Namaki S, Matsumoto M, Ohba H, Tanaka H, Koshikawa N, Shinohara M. Masticatory efficiency before and after surgery in oral cancer patients: comparative study of glossectomy, marginal mandibulectomy and segmental mandibulectomy. J Oral Sci 2004;46:113-7.   DOI
27 Lee SW, Gyorgy S, Choi JB, Choi JY, Kim SG. Carbon plate shows even distribution of stress, decreases screw loosening, and increases recovery of preoperative daily feed intake amount in a rabbit model of mandibular continuity defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:e245-51.   DOI
28 Jo C, Bae D, Choi B, Kim J. Removal of supernumerary teeth utilizing a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guide. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:924.e1-9.   DOI
29 Pinheiro M, Alves JL. The feasibility of a custom-made endoprosthesis in mandibular reconstruction: Implant design and finite element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015;43:2116-28.   DOI
30 Cohen A, Laviv A, Berman P, Nashef R, Abu-Tair J. Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:661-6.   DOI
31 Lee JW, An JH, Park SH, Chong JH, Kim GS, Han J, et al. Retrospective clinical study of an implant with a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched surface and internal connection: analysis of short-term success rate and marginal bone loss. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;38:42.   DOI
32 Davidson J, Birt BD, Gruss J. A-O plate mandibular reconstruction: a complication critique. J Otolaryngol 1991;20:104-7.