Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.4.192

Versatile midfacial degloving approach in oral and maxillofacial surgery  

Anunay, Pangarikar (Department of Dentistry, ESIC Medical College)
Umamaheswari, G. (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tamilnadu Government Dental College and Hospital)
Prachi, Parab (Private Clinic)
Suresh, Kumar (Department of Dental Surgery, Trinelveli Medical College and Hospital)
Devarathnamma, M.V. (Department of Periodontology, Navodaya Dental College)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.45, no.4, 2019 , pp. 192-198 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: Oral and maxillofacial surgeons must gain mastery of various approaches to the midface due to the increasing incidence, complexity, and severity of presenting midfacial fractures. Unlike in the case of other body parts, the need to preserve facial aesthetics makes it more difficult for the surgeon to select an approach for managing the facial injuries. The midfacial degloving (MFD) approach is a combination of intraoral and intranasal incisions made to access the midface without any external incision. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of MFD in maxillofacial surgery and to assess its advantages and complications. Materials and Methods: The MFD approach was used in five cases, with three cases treated with open reduction and internal fixation and two cases operated on for posttraumatic deformity. Nasal dorsum augmentation was completed in three cases and nasal osteotomy was performed in one case. The bicoronal flap technique was combined with MFD for frontal bone augmentation in one case. The intraoperative time required for flap completion and the ease of performing the planned procedures were noted. Postoperative evaluation was done for reduction, aesthetics, function, and complications. Results: Access was excellent for performing all planned procedures. Average time spent for flap elevation and exposure of the midface was 63 minutes. Complications like postoperative swelling, infraorbital nerve paresthesia, and intranasal crusting were all transient. No long-term complications like stenosis of the nose, sneer deformity, or weakness of the facial muscles were noticed. Additionally, no complications were noted when MFD was combined with bicoronal flap. Conclusion: Though the MFD approach is technically demanding and takes more time than other facial approaches, it should be learned and applied by maxillofacial surgeons in selective cases, as it provides complete exposure of the midface without facial scarring.
Keywords
Surgical incision; Rhinoplasty; Aesthetics; Facial injury; Internal fracture fixation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 David DJ, Moore MH. Cantilever nasal bone grafting with miniscrew fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:728-32.   DOI
2 Browne JD. The midfacial degloving procedure for nasal, sinus, and nasopharyngeal tumors. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2001;34:1095-104, viii.   DOI
3 Lenarz T, Keiner S. [Midfacial degloving: a different approach to the nasal cavity, the paranasal sinuses and the anterior skull base]. Laryngo Rhino Otol 1992;71:381-7. German.   DOI
4 Romo T 3rd, Foster CA, Korovin GS, Sachs ME. Repair of nasal septal perforation utilizing the midface degloving technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:739-42.   DOI
5 Cultrara A, Turk JB, Har-El G. Midfacial degloving approach for repair of naso-orbital-ethmoid and midfacial fractures. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:133-5.   DOI
6 Grover RS, Antonyshyn OM. (iv) Care of maxillofacial injuries in multiple trauma. Current Orthop 2003;17:274-86.   DOI
7 Maniglia AJ. Indications and techniques of midfacial degloving. A 15-year experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:750-2.   DOI
8 Price JC, Holliday MJ, Johns ME, Kennedy DW, Richtsmeier WJ, Mattox DE. The versatile midface degloving approach. Laryngoscope 1988;98:291-5.
9 Har-El G. Medial maxillectomy via midfacial degloving approach. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;10:82-6.   DOI
10 Casson PR, Bonanno PC, Converse JM. The midface degloving procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974;53:102-3.   DOI
11 Kitagawa Y, Baur D, King S, Helman JI. The role of midfacial degloving approach for maxillary cysts and tumors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1418-22.   DOI
12 Baumann A, Ewers R. Midfacial degloving: an alternative approach for traumatic corrections in the midface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:272-7.   DOI