Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.2.77

Retrospective clinical study on sinus bone graft and tapered-body implant placement  

Kim, Jong-Hwa (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Bae, Ji-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.39, no.2, 2013 , pp. 77-84 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated implant success rate, survival rate, marginal bone resorption of implants, and material resorption of sinus bone graft in cases wherein tapered body implants were installed. Materials and Methods: From September 2003 to January 2006, 20 patients from Seoul National University Bundong Hospital, with a mean age of 54.7 years, were considered. The mean follow-up period was 19 months. This study covered 50 implants; 14 implants were placed in the maxillary premolar area, and 36 in the maxillary molar area; 24 sinuses were included. Results: The success rate was 92%, and the survival rate was 96.0%. The mean amount of sinus augmentation was $12.35{\pm}3.27$ mm. The bone graft resorption rate one year after surgery was $0.97{\pm}0.84$ mm; that for the immediate implantation group was $0.91{\pm}0.86$ mm, and that for the delayed implantation group was $1.16{\pm}0.77$ mm. However, the difference was not statistically significant. The mean marginal bone resorption one year after restoration was $0.17{\pm}0.27$ mm (immediate group: $0.12{\pm}0.23$ mm; delayed group $0.40{\pm}0.33$ mm); statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: Tapered body implant can be available in the maxillary posterior edentulous ridge which sinus bone graft is necessary.
Keywords
Bone resorption; Sinus; Tapered implant;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Block MS, Kent JN, Kallukaran FU, Thunthy K, Weinberg R. Bone maintenance 5 to 10 years after sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:706-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Nkenke E, Thorwarth M, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA. Onlay augmentation versus sinuslift procedure in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 5-year comparative longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:885-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Alves CC, Neves M. Tapered implants: from indications to advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:161-7.
5 Astrand P, Billström C, Feldmann H, Fischer K, Henricsson V, Johansson B, et al. Tapered implants in jaws with soft bone quality: a clinical and radiographic 1-year study of the Branemark System Mark IV fixture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:213-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Bahat O. Technique for placement of oxidized titanium implants in compromised maxillary bone: prospective study of 290 implants in 126 consecutive patients followed for a minimum of 3 years after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:325-34.
7 Minichetti JC, D'Amore JC, Hong AY. Three-year analysis of tapered screw vent implants placed into maxillary sinuses grafted with mineralized bone allograft. J Oral Implantol 2008;34:135-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hockers T, Abensur D, Valentini P, Legrand R, Hammerle CH. The combined use of bioresorbable membranes and xenografts or autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants. A study in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:487-98.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim YK, Kim SG, Lee BG. Bone graft and implant. Seoul: Narae Pub Co.; 2007. p.169.
10 Graziani F, Ducci F, Tonelli M, El Askary AS, Monier M, Gabriele M. Maxillary sinus augmentation with platelet-rich plasma and fibrinogen cryoprecipitate: a tomographic pilot study. Implant Dent 2005;14:63-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kim YK. Implant risk factor of sinus bone graft (I): complication and early failure. Implantology 2006;10:42-55.
12 Wannfors K, Johansson B, Hallman M, Strandkvist T. A prospective randomized study of 1- and 2-stage sinus inlay bone grafts: 1-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:625-32.
13 Herzberg R, Dolev E, Schwartz-Arad D. Implant marginal bone loss in maxillary sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:103-10.
14 Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:565-77.
15 Galindo-Moreno P, Avila G, Fernández-Barbero JE, Aguilar M, Sánchez-Fernández E, Cutando A, et al. Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:376-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Rodoni LR, Glauser R, Feloutzis A, Hämmerle CH. Implants in the posterior maxilla: a comparative clinical and radiologic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:231-7.
17 Hallman M, Zetterqvist L. A 5-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with an 80:20 mixture of bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:82-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Achilli A, Tura F, Euwe E. Immediate/early function with tapered implants supporting maxillary and mandibular posterior fixed partial dentures: preliminary results of a prospective multicenter study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(6 Suppl):S52-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L. Dental implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcome according to the initial clinical situation and a proposal of defect classification. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:416-28.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Lee EJ, Kim W, Choi JY, Kim SM, Oh NS. A systematic review of the survival rate on short implants. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47:457-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Garcia-Vives N, Andres-Garcia R, Rios-Santos V, Fernandez-Palacin A, Bullon-Fernandez P, Herrero-Climent M, et al. In vitro evaluation of the type of implant bed preparation with osteotomes in bone type IV and its influence on the stability of two implant systems. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:e455-60.
22 Nedir R, Nurdin N, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bischof M. Placement of tapered implants using an osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without bone grafting: 1-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:727-33.
23 Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:639-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Jensen OT, Greer RO. Immediate placement of osseointegrated implants into the maxillary sinus augmented with mineralized cancellous allograft and Gore-Tex: second stage surgical and histological findings. In: Laney WR, Tolman DE, eds. Tissue integration in oral, orthopedic, and maxillofacial reconstruction. Chicago: Quintessence; 1992.
25 Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Pecora G, Piattelli M, Orsini G, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dent 2006;15:197-207.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Maiorana C, Sigurtà D, Mirandola A, Garlini G, Santoro F. Sinus elevation with alloplasts or xenogenic materials and implants: an up-to-4-year clinical and radiologic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:426-32.