Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2010.36.6.515

Comparison of healing pattern with or without bone graft after odontogenic cyst enucleation  

Baek, Chae-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Park, Joon-Hyung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kim, Gun-Jong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Hong, Jong-Rak (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kim, Chang-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Paeng, Jun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.36, no.6, 2010 , pp. 515-519 More about this Journal
Abstract
Introduction: Bone defects in the jaw are frequently observed after odontogenic cyst enucleation. The success of bone healing appears to be related to the size of the bone defect, the anatomical location, the patient's age and other parameters. The use of bone grafting material is dependent on the operator's preference. No evidence-based definite treatment protocol has been established. This study evaluated the effect of a bone graft into the defect after odontogenic cyst enucleation. Materials and Methods: A total of 55 patients, who had been treated for an odontogenic cyst with cyst enucleation from 2000 to 2009 at the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, were included in this study. Patients who were followed-up for more than 1 year were included. Two groups were defined according to the bone graft (with or without a bone graft) after cyst enucleation. The differences in the healing periods and patterns of bone healing were compared clinically and radiologically. The postoperative 1 year radiographs were analyzed for bone healing and density. Statistical analysis was performed using a Pearson chi square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: More infection signs were observed in the bone graft group than in the other group, but there was no statistically significant difference. Radiographically, there was also no significant difference in the size of the radiolucent lesions between the two groups. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in healing between the groups with a bone graft and without bone graft after cyst enucleation.
Keywords
Bone graft; Bone healing; Cyst enucleation; Odontogenic cyst;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Schaaf H, Lendeckel S, Howaldt HP, Streckbein P. Donor site morbidity after bone harvesting from the anterior iliac crest. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:52-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Marker P, Brondum N, Clausen PP, Bastian HL. Treatment of large odontogenic keratocysts by decompression and later cystectomy: a long-term follow-up and a histologic study of 23 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:122-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Horowitz I, Bodner L. Use of xenograft bone with aspirated bone marrow for treatment of cystic defect of the jaws. Head Neck 1989;11:516-23.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Dodde R 2nd, Yavuzer R, Bier UC, Alkadri A, Jackson IT. Spontaneous bone healing in the rabbit. J Craniofac Surg 2000; 11:346-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Hjorting-Hansen E, Andreasen JO. Incomplete bone healing of experimental cavities in dog mandibles. Br J Oral Surg 1971; 9:33-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Chiapasco M, Rossi A, Motta JJ, Crescentini M. Spontaneous bone regeneration after enucleation of large mandibular cysts: a radiographic computed analysis of 27 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:942-8; discussion 949.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Brondum N, Jensen VJ. Recurrence of keratocysts and decompression treatment. A long-term follow-up of forty-four cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:265-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Jones AV, Craig GT, Franklin CD. Range and demographics of odontogenic cysts diagnosed in a UK population over a 30-year period. J Oral Pathol Med 2006;35:500-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Grossmann SM, Machado VC, Xavier GM, Moura MD, Gomez RS, Aguiar MC, et al. Demographic profile of odontogenic and selected nonodontogenic cysts in a Brazilian population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:e35-41.
10 Tortorici S, Amodio E, Massenti MF, Buzzanca ML, Burruano F, Vitale F. Prevalence and distribution of odontogenic cysts in Sicily: 1986-2005. J Oral Sci 2008;50:15-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Eyre J, Zakrzewska JM. The conservative management of large odontogenic keratocysts. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;23:195-203.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Nakamura N, Mitsuyasu T, Mitsuyasu Y, Taketomi T, Higuchi Y, Ohishi M. Marsupialization for odontogenic keratocysts: longterm follow-up analysis of the effects and changes in growth characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:543-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Halse A, Molven O, Fristad I. Diagnosing periapical lesions-disagreement and borderline cases. Int Endod J 2002;35:703-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Ihan Hren N, Miljavec M. Spontaneous bone healing of the large bone defects in the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37:1111-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Ricucci D, Lin LM, Spangberg LS. Wound healing of apical tissues after root canal therapy: a long-term clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic observation study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:609-21.   DOI   ScienceOn