Browse > Article

COMPARISON THE CORTICAL PERFORATION OF BOTH THE RECIPIENT BEDS AND GRAFTS WITH THE CORTICAL PERFORATION OF ONLY THE RECIPIENT BEDS  

Chang, In-Geol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Lee, Dong-Geol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Shin, Chang-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Hong, Jong-Rak (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.35, no.6, 2009 , pp. 467-473 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare volume and revascularization of autogenous block bone grafts in simultaneously cortical perforation of recipient beds and grafts, and only cortical perforation of recipient beds. Materials and methods: Two block bone in 8mm diameter was harvested in both skull using trephine bur on 20 New Zealand white rabbits. Harvested block bone was grafted on both inferior border of mandible. On the left side(experimental side), cortical bone of recipient beds and graft were perforated, and on the right side(control side), the only recipient bed was perforated. The rabbits had been sacrificed and infused the India ink for the observation of revascularization at 20 day and 40 day after surgery. The specimens were processed for H-E staining and quantitative analysis(independent t-test, p<0.01) was made under an optical microscope. In additional, specimens were processed for the observation of revascularization. Results: After 20 days, more bone volume was observed in experimental group, but no significant difference between two groups(p=0.106). There were significantly more bone volume in the experimental group at 40 days after surgery(p<0.01). After 20 days, more discrete vascular sprouts were observed in experimental side, but no difference at 40 days after surgery. Conclusion: We conclude that the cortical perforation of both the recipient beds and grafts improve revascularization at early stage and overall graft persistence.
Keywords
Block bone; Recipient beds; Cortical perforation; Revascularization;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ozaki W, Buchman SR: Volume maintenance of onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton: micro-architecture versus embryologic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:291-299   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
2 Cho BC, Chung HY, Shin DP, Park JW, Baik BS: Early revascularization of membranous inlay bone graft in canine mandible model. J Craniofac Surg 2002;13:251-257   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Alberius P, Gordh M, Lindberg L, Johnell O: Influence of surrounding soft tissues on onlay bone graft incorporation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:22-33   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 Alberius P, Gordh M, Lindberg L, Johnell O: Onlay bone graft behaviour after marrow exposure of the recipient rat skull bone. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996;30:257-266   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Buser D, Dula K, Hirt HP, Schenk RK: Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes: a clinical study with 40 partially edentulous patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:420-432; discussion 432-423   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
6 Burchardt H: The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983:28-42   PUBMED
7 Deleu J: Vascularization of bone grafts in the anterior chamber of the eye. J Bone Joint Surg 1965;47:319-329
8 Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T: Augmentation of the rat jaw with autogeneic cortico-cancellous bone grafts and guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:192-202   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
9 Nishimura I, Shimizu Y, Ooya K: Effects of cortical bone perforation on experimental guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:293-300   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 Schmid J, Hammerle CH, Olah AJ, Lang NP: Membrane permeability is unnecessary for guided generation of new bone. An experimental study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:125-130   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
11 Schmid J, Wallkamm B, Hammerle CH, Gogolewski S, Lang NP: The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:244-248   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
12 Lundgren D, Lundgren AK, Sennerby L, Nyman S: Augmentation of intramembraneous bone beyond the skeletal envelope using an occlusive titanium barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:67-72   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
13 Majzoub Z, Berengo M, Giardino R, Aldini NN, Cordioli G: Role of intramarrow penetration in osseous repair: a pilot study in the rabbit calvaria. J Periodontol 1999;70:1501-1510   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
14 Shapiro F: Cortical bone repair. The relationship of the lacunarcanalicular system and intercellular gap junctions to the repair process. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:1067-1081   DOI   PUBMED
15 Hammack BL, Enneking WF: Comparative vascularization of autogenous and homogenous-bone transplants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1960;42-A:811-817   PUBMED
16 Gordh M, Alberius P, Lindberg L, Johnell O: Bone graft incorporation after cortical perforations of the host bed. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:664-670   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
17 Albrektsson T: Repair of bone grafts. A vital microscopic and histological investigation in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;14:1-12   DOI   PUBMED
18 Ray RD: Vascularization of bone grafts and implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1972;87:43-48   PUBMED
19 Manson PN: Facial bone healing and bone grafts. A review of clinical physiology. Clin Plast Surg 1994;21:331-348   PUBMED
20 Smith JC: Membranous vs endochondral bone grafts. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1974;99:203-205   DOI
21 Widmark G, Andersson B, Ivanoff CJ: Mandibular bone graft in the anterior maxilla for single-tooth implants. Presentation of surgical method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:106-109   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
22 De Marco AC, Jardini MA, Lima LP: Revascularization of autogenous block grafts with or without an e-PTFE membrane. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:867-874   PUBMED
23 Alberius P, Dahlin C, Linde A: Role of osteopromotion in experimental bone grafting to the skull: a study in adult rats using a membrane technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:829-834   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
24 Jardini MA, De Marco AC, Lima LA: Early healing pattern of autogenous bone grafts with and without e-PTFE membranes: a histomorphometric study in rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:666-673   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
25 Kostopoulos L, Karring T: Guided bone regeneration in mandibular defects in rats using a bioresorbable polymer. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:66-74   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
26 Nathanson A: The early vascularization of an autogenous bone inlay into an artificial defect in the rabbit mandibula. Acta Otolaryngol 1978;85:135-148   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
27 Buser D, Bragger U, Lang NP, Nyman S: Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:22-32   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
28 Kusiak JF, Zins JE, Whitaker LA: The early revascularization of membranous bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:510-516   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
29 Lin KY, Bartlett SP, Yaremchuk MJ, Fallon M, Grossman RF, Whitaker LA: The effect of rigid fixation on the survival of onlay bone grafts: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:449-456   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
30 Zins JE, Whitaker LA: Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;72:778-785   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
31 Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Schupbach P: Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier. An experimental study in the monkey. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:323-331   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
32 Trueta J, Morgan JD: The vascular contribution to osteogenesis. I. Studies by the injection method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1960;42-B:97-109   DOI   PUBMED
33 Jensen OT, Greer RO, Jr., Johnson L, Kassebaum D: Vertical guided bone-graft augmentation in a new canine mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:335-344   PUBMED
34 Phillips JH, Rahn BA: Fixation effects on membranous and endochondral onlay bone-graft resorption. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;82:872-877   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
35 Sullivan WG, Szwajkun PR: Revascularization of cranial versus iliac crest bone grafts in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:1105-1109   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
36 Rompen EH, Biewer R, Vanheusden A, Zahedi S, Nusgens B: The influence of cortical perforations and of space filling with peripheral blood on the kinetics of guided bone generation. A comparative histometric study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res1999;10:85-94   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
37 Phillips JH, Rahn BA: Fixation effects on membranous and endochondral onlay bone graft revascularization and bone deposition. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;85:891-897   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
38 ten Bruggenkate CM, Kraaijenhagen HA, van der Kwast WA, Krekeler G, Oosterbeek HS: Autogenous maxillary bone grafts in conjunction with placement of I.T.I. endosseous implants. A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:81-84   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
39 Chen NT, Glowacki J, Bucky LP, Hong HZ, Kim WK, Yaremchuk MJ: The roles of revascularization and resorption on endurance of craniofacial onlay bone grafts in the rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:714-722; discussion 723-714   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
40 Jackson IT, Adham M, Bite U, Marx R: Update on cranial bone grafts in craniofacial surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1987;18:37-40   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
41 Hardesty RA, Marsh JL: Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;85:5-14; discussion 15   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
42 Goldstein JA, Mase CA, Newman MH: The influence of bony architecture on fixed membranous bone graft survival. Ann Plast Surg 1995;34:162-167   PUBMED