Browse > Article

Influence of implant misplacement on the success of the final prosthesis: Subjective evaluation by a prosthodontist of dental implants placed by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon  

Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Hwang, Jung-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Lee, Hyo-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Yeo, In-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Yun, Pil-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.35, no.6, 2009 , pp. 437-441 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: In many cases, the erroneous placement of a dental implant brings about undesirable results. Here, the effect of dental implant placement on the success of the final prosthesis was evaluated from the point of view of the prosthodontist. Materials and Methods: All surgical operations were performed by the same oral surgeon with the same surgical protocol and all prosthodontic procedures were performed by the same prosthodontist. The problems faced by the prosthodontist, their causes, and their effect on prosthesis success were identified. The success of the final prostheses was evaluated by the same prosthodontist. Results: Only 53% (238 implants in 105 patients) of dental implants were not associated with prosthodontic problems. Multiple implant placement (more than three implants) was associated more frequently with prosthodontic problems. Conclusions: The data indicate that the satisfactory construction of a prosthesis is highly dependent on the placement of the dental implant in the best possible position. It is strongly recommended that the oral surgeon and the prosthodontist engage in pre-operative discussions to establish a top-down treatment plan, as this will improve implant placement and ultimately the success of the prosthesis.
Keywords
Dental implant; Placement error; Prosthodontic problem;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Garber DA, Belser UC. Restoration?driven implant placement with restoration generated site development. Compend contin educ dent 1995;16:796,798-802,804   PUBMED
2 Chang M, Wennstrom JL, Odman P, Andersson B. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:185-194   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Neale D, Chee WW. Development of implant soft tissue emergence profile: a technique. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:364-368   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Sadler JP, McKay ML. Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:270-278   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Problems with prostheses on implants: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:283-288   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
6 Meffert RM. Issues related to single-tooth implants. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:1383-1390   DOI   PUBMED
7 Chang M, Odman PA, Wennstrom JL, Andersson B. Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:335-341   PUBMED
8 Clelland NL, Gilat A, McGlumphy EA, Brantley WA. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:541-548   PUBMED
9 Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Brantley WA. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthodont 1995;4:95-100   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 Listgarten MA. Clinical trials of endosseous implants: issues in analysis and interpretation. Ann Periodontol 1997;2:299-313   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
11 Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol 2006;77:1410-1420   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
12 Dario LJ. Implant angulation and position and screw or cement retention: clinical guidelines. Implant Dent. 1996;5(2):101-104   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
13 Kim YK, Park HS, Choung SM. Solution of Implant Problem. Vol. 2. Problem solution of surgical and prosthodontic treatment. Narae Pub Co. Seoul Korea. 2003; 270-354
14 Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Celletti R, tecucianu JF. Three-stage approach to aesthetic implant restoration : emergence profile concept. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001;13:761-767   PUBMED
15 Pampel M, Wolf R, Dietrich S. A prosthodontic technique to improve the simplicity and the efficacy of angled abutments for divergent implant situations: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:320-324   PUBMED
16 Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:360-370   PUBMED
17 Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, Foum S, Mgner A, Cho SC, Salama M, Salama H, Garber DA. Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J periodontal 2003;74:1785-1788   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
18 Brosh T, Pilo R, Sudai D. The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:328-334   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
19 Saadoun AP, LeGall M, Touati B. Selection and ideal tri-dimensional implant position for soft tissue aesthetics. Pract Periodontics aesthet Dent 1999;11:1063-1072
20 Kohner JS. Implant team: problems and solutions with osseointegrated implants. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1992;4:27-32   PUBMED
21 Sutpideler M, Eckert SE, Zobitz M, An KN. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:819-825   PUBMED
22 Smukler H, Castellucci F, Capri D. The role of the implant housing in obtaining aesthetics: generation of peri-implant gingivae and papillae-Part I. Preact Proced Aesthet Dent 2003;15:141-149   PUBMED
23 Balshi TJ, Ekfeldt A, Stenberg T, Vrielinck L. Three-year evaluation of Branemark implants connected to angulated abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:52-58   PUBMED