Browse > Article

SONOGRAPHIC CHANGE OF MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS  

Kim, Chul-Hwan (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook Universiy)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.33, no.4, 2007 , pp. 297-306 More about this Journal
Abstract
Distraction osteogenesis was pioneered by Ilizarov in the treatment of injured extremities. Its subsequent application to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery has opened a new chapter in the treatment of facial deformity. Careful monitoring of the period of distraction and consolidation of the callus is important and has been well described. Complications, such as infection, haematoma and premature ossification, are difficult to diagnose and can compromise the outcome after the surgery. Too slow rate of distraction results in premature fusion of cortices and too rapid information of bone 'cyst' within the callus distraction. I experienced 2 patients of congenital unilateral mandibular hypoplasia, so called Hemifacial Microsomia. After distraction surgery, I evaluated callus formation of mandibular distraction with Ultrasound Sonography during distraction and consolidation period. Plain radiography, although it enables accurate measurement of the distraction gap, did not give sufficient detail to allow assessment of early stages of bone formation, But, ultrasound monitoring could enable continuous monitoring of the distraction gap without exposure to ionizing radiation and allow detection of fine detail, which may influence manipulation of the callus.
Keywords
Distraction Osteogenesis; Ultrasonography; Hemifacial microsomia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ilizarov G: The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part 1 and 2. Clin Orthope 1989;238:253
2 Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Perrott DH, et al.: Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:507   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Maffulli N, Hughes T, Fixsen JA: Ultrasonographic monitoring of limb lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg 1992;74(B):130
4 Ilizarov GA: Basic principles of transosseous compression and distraction osteosynthesis. Orthop Traumatol Protez 1971;32:7
5 McCarthy, JG, Katzen JT, Hopper R, Grayson BH: The first decade of mandibular distraction: Lessons we have learned. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:1704   DOI   ScienceOn
6 McCarthy JG, Williams JK, Grayson BH, Crombie JS: Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible: Device development and clinical application. J Craniofac Surg 1998;9:322   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Chin M, Toth BA: Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: Review of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:45
8 Juenger TH, Klingmueller V, Howaldt H-P: Standardisierte sonographische Verlaufskontrolle bei der Kallusdistraktion am Unterkiefer. Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir 1998;2:331
9 Nicholls PJ, Berg E, Bliven FE, et al.: X-ray diagnosis of healing fractures in rabbits. Clin Orthop 1979;142:234
10 Mofid MM, Manson PM, Robertson BC, et al.: Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: A review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1103   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Derbishire ND, Simpson AH: A role for ultrasound in limb lengthening. Br J Radiol 1992;65:576   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Mofid MM, Manson PN, Robertson BC, et al: Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: A review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1103   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Maull DJ: Review of devices for distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial complex. Semin Orthod 1999;5:64
14 Derbyshire NDJ: A role for ultrasound in limb lengthening. Br J Radiol 1992;65:576   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Pensler JM, Goldberg DP, Lindell B. et al: Skeletal distraction of the hypoplastic mandible. Ann Plast Surg 1995;34:130   DOI
16 McCarthy, JG, Stelnicki, EJ, Grayson BH: Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: A ten-year experience. Semin. Orthod 1999;5:3
17 Carls FR, Sailer H: Seven years of clinical experience with mandibular distraction in children. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:197   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Troulis MJ, Padwa B, Kaban LB: Distraction osteogenesis: Past, present and future. Fac Plast Surg 1998;14:205   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Cohen SR: Craniofacial distraction with a modular internal distraction system: Evolution of design and surgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:1592   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Corcoran J, Hubli EH, Salyer KE: Distraction osteogenesis of costochondral neomandibles: A clinical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:311   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Tavakoli K, Walsh WR, Smart, R, et al.: The role of latency in mandibular osteodistraction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:209   DOI   ScienceOn
22 F. Molina, Ortiz Monastero F: Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: A farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:825   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Stelnicki EJ, Hollier LH, Lee, C, Lin, WY, Grayson B, McCarthy JG: Distraction osteogenesis of costochondral bone grafts in the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:925   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Moore MH, Guzman-Stein G, Proudman TW, et al.: Mandibular lengthening by distraction for airway obstruction in Treacher-Collins syndrome. J Craniofac Surg 1994;5:22-26   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Huppertz R, Pfeil J, Kaps HP: Sonographische Verlaufskontrollen yon Verl-ingerungsosteotomien. Orthop 1990;128:90
26 Bail H, Windhagen H, Kolbeck S, et al.: Ultrasound measurements is a strong predictor of torsional bone regenerate stiffness in distraction osteogenesis, Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA (1997) February 9-13, Presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting
27 ILizarov GA, Soybelman LM: Some clinical and experimental data on the bloodless lengthening of lower limbs. Exp Khir Anes 1969;4:27
28 Hughes TH, Mafulli N, Green V, et al.: Imaging in bone lengthening. Clin Orthop 1994;308:50