Browse > Article

RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF PERI-IMPLANT BONE LOSS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE MORPHOLOGY ON MAXILLARY ANTERIOR ALVEOLAR RIDGE  

Lee, Jun-Hee (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Hong, Jong-Rak (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Kim, Chang-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.32, no.6, 2006 , pp. 575-579 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : The purpose of this study was to evaluate peri-implant bone loss and implant success on anterior maxillary alveolar ridges and Compare Class III and Class IV ridges in the aspect of peri-implant bone loss. Material and Methods : 14 patients (aged 21 to 68, 6males and 8females), who lacked maxillary anterior teeth and were installed from January 2000 to April 2003 at Samsung Medical Center, were selected. The type of implant used included 30 $Br\ddot{a}nemark$ implant. They were taken with digital tomographic and conventional intraoral radiographic examinmation, and were treated with implant installaion without bone augmentation. The peri-implant bone resorption was measured at the mesial and distal aspect of implant on the conventional intraoral radiographs. Results : The study classified the anterior maxillary alveolar ridge and measured peri-implant bone resorption from the period of implant installation to the 2nd year after functional loading radiographically. The study revealed no statistically significant difference between two groups, which was classified by its morphology. The average bone resorption on healing period before loading was 0.18mm and 0.18mm, the 1st year of loading period, 0.77 mm and 0.84mm, and on the 2nd year of loading period, 0.07mm and 0.06mm, respectively on both Class III and class IV. Conclusion : In the knife edge form of anterior maxillary residual ridges(Class IV), implant placement without ridge augmentation does not have significant difference with that of Class III alveolar ridge in the concern of Implant success after 2 year functional loading period in the aspect of peri-implant bone resorption radiographically.
Keywords
Anterior maxilla; Peri-implant; Bone loss; Bone resorption; Morphology; Cawood & Howell's classification;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cawood JI, Howell RA: A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17:232-236   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Dahlin C, Linde A, Rockert H: Stimulation of early bone formation by the combination of an osteopromotive membrane technique and hyperbaric oxygen. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1993;27:103-108   DOI
3 Bryant SR, Zarb GA: Crestal bone loss proximal to oral implants in older and younger adults. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:589-597   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Behneke A, Behneke N, d'Hoedt B, Wagner W: Hard and soft tissue reactions to ITI screw implants: 3-year longitudinal results of a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:749-757
5 Pietrokovski J, Massler M: Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17:21-27   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Werbitt MJ, Goldberg PV: The immediate implant: bone preservation and bone regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:206-217
7 Watzek G, Solar P, Ulm C, Matejka M: Surgical criteria for endosseous implant placement: an overview. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993;5:87-94, quiz 96
8 Celletti R, Pameijer CH, Bracchetti G, Donath K, Persichetti G, Visani I: Histologic evaluation of osseointegrated implants restored in nonaxial functional occlusion with preangled abutments. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15:562-573
9 Becker W, Becker BE, Israelson H, Lucchini JP, Handelsman M, Ammons W et al.: One-step surgical placement of Branemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:454-462
10 Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P: The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63:995-996   DOI
11 Pietrokovski J, Sorin S, Hirschfeld Z: The residual ridge in partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:150-158   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Andreasen JO: Fractures of the alveolar process of the jaw. A clinical and radiographic follow-up study. Scand J Dent Res 1970;78:263-272
13 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI, Lindhe J, Eriksson B et al.: Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;15:39-52   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Lazzara RJ: Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:332-343
15 Nevins M, Mellonig JT: The advantages of localized ridge augmentation prior to implant placement: a staged event. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:96-111
16 Penarrocha M, Palomar M, Sanchis JM, Guarinos J, Balaguer J: Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:861-867
17 Levy D, Deporter DA, Pharoah M, Tomlinson G: A comparison of radiographic bone height and probing attachment level measurements adjacent to porous-coated dental implants in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:541-546
18 Kois JC: Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2004;25:895-896, 898, 900 passim; quiz 906-897