Browse > Article

A STUDY ON THE BONE FORMATION OF GRAFT MATERIAL CONTAINING DEMINERALIZED BONE MATRIX WITH A SIMULTANEOUS INSTALLATION OF IMPLANT  

Kim, Yeo-Gab (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Kyung-Hee University)
Yoon, Byung-Wook (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Kyung-Hee University)
Ryu, Dong-Mok (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Kyung-Hee University)
Lee, Baek-Soo (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Kyung-Hee University)
Oh, Jung-Hwan (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Kyung-Hee University)
Kwon, Yong-Dae (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Kyung-Hee University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.31, no.6, 2005 , pp. 481-491 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of autogenous bone and allograft material coverd with a bioresorbable membrane on bone regeneration after a simultaneous installation of implant. Materials and methods: Twelve healthy rabbits, weighing about $3{\sim}4$ kg, were used in this experiment. Following impalnt(with 3.25 mm diameter and 8 mm length) site preparation by surgical protocol of $Oraltronics^{(R)}$, artificial bony defect, 5mm sized in height and depth, was created on femoral condyle using trephine drill(with 5 mm diameter and 5 mm length). Then implant was inserted. In the experimental group A, the bony defect was filled with autogenous particulated bone and coverd with $Lyoplant^{(R)}$ resorbable membrane. In the experimental group B, the bony defect was filled with allograft material(Orthoblast $II^{(R)}$) containing demineralized bone matrix and covered with $Lyoplant^{(R)}$. In the control group, without any graft materials, the bony defect was covered with $Lyoplant^{(R)}$. The experimental group A and B were divided into each 9 cases and control group into 3 cases. The experimental animals were sacrificed at 3, 6 and 8 weeks after surgery and block specimens were obtained. With histologic and histomorphometric analysis, we observed the histologic changes of the cells and bone formation after H-E staining and then, measured BIC and bone density with KAPPA Image $Base^{(R)}$ system. Results: As a result of this experiment, bone formation and active remodeling process were examined in all experimental groups and the control. But, the ability of bone formation of the experimental group A was somewhat better than any other groups. Especially bone to-implant contact fraction ranged from 12.7% to 43.45% in the autogenous bone group and from 9.02% to 29.83% in DBM group, at 3 and 8 weeks. But, bone density ranged from 15.67% to 23.17% in the autogenous bone group and from 25.95% to 46.06% in DBM group at 3 and 6 weeks, respectively. Although the bone density of DBM group was better than that of autogenous bone group at 3 and 6weeks, the latter was better than the former at 8 weeks, 54.3% and 45.1%, respectively. Therefore these results showed that DBM enhanced the density of newly formed bone at least initially.
Keywords
Autogenous Particulated Bone; Demineralized Bone Matrix; Bone to Implant Contact; Bone Density;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 William RM, Stephen EG, Gergory IB: Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ J Surg 2001;71:354-361   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Becker W: Treatment of small defects adjacent to oral implants with various biomaterials. J Periodontol 2003;33:26-35   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Dahlin C, Andersson L, Lindhe A: Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1991;2(4):159-165   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Matthias AWM, Jaap CM, Hans MF: Incorporation of composite bone implants in the facial skeleton. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000;11:422-429   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Araujo MG , Sonohara M, Hayaclbara R, Cardaropoll G, Lindhe J: Lateral ridge augmentation by the use of grafts comprised of autologous bone or a biomaterial. An experiment in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:1122-1131   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Reddi AH, Cunningham NS: Recent progress in bone induction with osteo-genin and bone morphogenic proteins: challenges for biomechanical and tissue engineering. J Biomech Eng 1991;113:189-190   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Becker W, Schenk R, Higuchi K, Lekholm U, Becker E: Variations in bone rege- neration adjacent to implants augmented with barrier membranes alone or with demineralized feeze-dried bone or autologous grafts. A study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:143-154
8 Shirota T, Ohno K, Motohashi M, Michi K: Histologic and microradiologic compari- son of block and particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafts in reconstructed mandibles being considered for dental implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:15-20   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Tae-Ju O, Stephen JM, Eun-Ju L, William VG, Hom-Lay W: Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:80-90   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Thordarson DB, Kuehn S: Use of demineralized bone matrix in ankle/hindfoot fusion. Foot Ankle Int 2003;24(7):557-560
11 김수민, 여환호, 김수관, 임성철: 백서에서 흡수성막과 탈회동결건조골을 이용한 두개골결손부의 골재생. 대구외지 2002;28:290-301
12 Mardas N, Kostopoulos L, Stavropoulos A, Karring T: Osteogenesis by guided tissue regeneration and demineralized bone matrix. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:176-183   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Thomas VA, Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Buser D: Lateral ridge augmentation using different bone fillers and barrier membrane application. A histologic and histomorphometric pilot study in canine mandible. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001;12:260-269   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Miller N, Penaud J, Foliguet B, Membre H, Ambrosini P, Plombas M: Resorption rates of 2 commercially available biore- sorbable membranes. A histomorphometric study in a rabbit model. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:1051-1059   DOI   ScienceOn
15 John LU, Hideki M, Hak-Sun K, Akihito M, Scott DB: Evidence of osteoinduction by Grafton demineralized bone matrix in nonhuman primate spinal fusion. Spine 2004;29:360-366   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Liljensten E, larsson C, Thomsen P, Blomqvist G, Hirsch JM, Wedenberg C: Studies of the healing of bone grafts and the incorporation of titanium implants in grafted bone: an experimental animal model. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998;9:535-541   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Chen NT, Glowacki J, Bucky LP, Hong HZ, Kim WK, Yaremchuk MJ: The role of revascularization and resorption on endurance of craniofacial onlay grafts in rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:714-724   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Karring T, Nyman S, Lindhe J: Healing following implantation of periodontitis affected roots into bone tissue. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:96-105   DOI   PUBMED
19 Springer ING, Hendrik T, Stefan G, Franz H, Jurgen H, Yahya A: Particulated bone grafts - effectiveness of bone cell supply. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:205-212   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Davies JE: Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont II 1998:391-401
21 Rolf S: Double coating accelerated bone regeneration. Clinical aspects of $FBR^{\circledR}$ double-coated Pitt$Easy^{\circledR}$ Bio-Oss implants $Oraltronics^{\circledR}$). DGZI 5 issue 2001;3:22-30
22 Cheung S, Westerheide K, Ziran B: Efficacy of contained metaphyseal and periarticular defects treated with two different demineralized bone matrix allografts. Int Orthop 2003;27:56-59
23 Misch CE: Contemporary Implant Dentistry 2nd edition. Mosby: 1999:228-237
24 Kathy T, James LR, Jean TE, Harrison AS, Ileene RS, David K: Donor age and gender effects on osteoinductivity of demineralized bone matrix. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2004;70B:21-29   DOI
25 Boyne PJ: Induction for bone repair by various bone grafting materials, hard tissue growth, repair and remineralization. Ciba Found Symp 1973;11:121-129
26 Urist MR, Leitze A, Mizutani H, Takagi K, Triffitt JT, Amstutz J, DeLange R, Termine J, Fineman GA: A bovine low molecular weight bone morphogenic protein (BMP) fraction. Clin Orthop 1982;162:219-232
27 Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J: Appositional bone formation in marginal defects at implants. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:1-9   DOI   ScienceOn
28 강상규, 이종호, 김명진: 임플란트 매식시 골형성단백질 및 탈회동종골 사용에 따른 골재생 및 계면에 대한 연구. 대구외지 2000;26:24-39
29 Mahmoud H, Mahamoud S: Osteoinduction in rhesus monkeys using demineralized bone powder allografts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;43:837-844   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Matthias AWM, Japp CM, Hans MF, Anne MKJ: Incorporation of particulated bone implants in the facial skeleton. Biomaterials 1999;20:2029-2035   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Luiz A, Anita M, Niklaus P, Christoph H, Edson L, Eduardo P, Jose H: Surface charateristics of implants influence their bone integration after simultaneous placement of implants and GBR membrane. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:669-679   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Stentz WC, Mealey BL, Gunsolley JC, Waldrop TC: Effect of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II histologic analysis. J periodontol 1997;68:933-949   DOI   ScienceOn