Browse > Article

TREATMENT OUTCOME OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLAR FRACTURE WITH ARTHROCENTESIS AND LAVAGE  

Yoon, Ok-Byung (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Pohang Christianity Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons / v.28, no.4, 2002 , pp. 286-289 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the treatment of mandibular condylar fractures, arthrocentesis, lavage and selective intermaxillary fixation were performed after closed reduction. In this lavage group, the physiotherapy performed for 3-6 months after injury. in control group, continuous intermaxillary fixation was done for 1-3 weeks, and physiotherapy followed in the same method of the lavage group. In the comparative study of the both groups, the following results are shown. 1. Compared to control group, the lavage group had a slightly superior result at range of motion, joint pain and occlusal deviation, from I day after arthrocentesis to 6 months after injury. 2. The significant differences between both groups were seen at range of motion and joint pain in 1 month after injury. 3. At 6 months after injury, the differences between both groups were not significant at range of motion, joint pain and occlusal deviation. From this study, in the mandibular condylar fracture, the arthrosentesis, lavage and selective intermaxillary fixation after closed reduction can improve symptoms such as joint pain and occlusal deviation, also increase range of motion. in this therapeutic way, intracapsular hemarthrosis which can cause TMJ ankylosis or dysfunction can be removed effectively. in addition, patient's discomfort such as swallowing disturbance, speech disturbance and emotional stress can be reduced signuficantly.
Keywords
Condylar Fracture; Closed Reduction; Arthrocentesis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zide MF, Kent JN : Indications for open reduction of mandibular condylar fractures. J oral Maxillofac surg 1983; 41:89-98   DOI   ScienceOn
2 MacLennan WD : Consideration of 180 cases of typical fractures of mandibular condylar proass. Br J Plast Surg 1952;5:122
3 Walker RV : The consultant : Condylar fractures. J Oral Surg 1966;24:367-368
4 Henny FA : Technic for open reduction of fractures of the mandibular condyle. J Oral Surg 1951;9:233-237   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Peterson LJ. Indresano AT, Marciani RD, and Roser SM : Traumatic injuries of the condyle. Principles of oral & maxillofacial surgery. 1992, Vol.1, 435-468
6 Lindahl L: Condylar fractures of the mandible. I. Classification and relation to age, occlasion and concomitant injuries of teeth and teeth supporting structures, and fractures of the mandibular body. Int J Oral Surg 1977;6:12-21   DOI   PUBMED
7 Chalmers J, Lyons Club. Fractures involving the mandibular condyle : A post-treatment survey of 120 cases. J Oral Surg 1974;9:233
8 Kromer H. Closed and open reduction of condylar fratures. Dental Record 1953;73:569
9 Raveh J, Vuillemin T, and Ladrach K : Open reduction of the dislocated, fractured condylar process : Indications and surgical procedures. J oral Maxillofac surg 1989; 47:120-126   PUBMED
10 Beekler DM, Walker RV. Condyle fractures. J Oral Surg 1969;27:563-564   DOI   PUBMED