Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14476/jomp.2014.39.4.133

Analysis of Neurosensory Dysfunction after Dental Implant Surgery  

Choi, Young-Chan (Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Cho, Eunae S. (Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Merrill, Robert L. (UCLA School of Dentistry)
Kim, Seong Taek (Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Ahn, Hyung Joon (Department of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine, Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain / v.39, no.4, 2014 , pp. 133-139 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: There have been reports regarding the various factors associated with the level of discomfort and recovery from neurosensory symptoms in patients with trigeminal nerve injury. However, the contributing factors remain uncertain and poorly understood. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the possible association between various factors expected to affect neurosensory discomfort and recovery in patients with mandibular nerve injury after dental implant surgery. Methods: Eighty-nine post-dental implant surgery patients with mandibular nerve injury were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. A medical records review of the patients was done to determine if the patients' improvement was related to pain intensity, the length of time between the injury and removal of the implant or the depth of penetration of the implant into the mandibular canal as determined by cone-beam computed tomography. Results: There was no significant linear relationship between pain intensity and symptomatic improvement (p=0.319). There was no significant linear relationship between the level of mandibular canal penetration and either pain intensity (p=0.588) or symptomatic improvement (p=0.760). There was a statistically significant linear relationship between length of time before the injury was treated, both with pain intensity (p=0.004), and symptomatic improvement (p=0.024). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the length of time between nerve injury and initiation of conservative treatment is more closely related to the pain intensity and symptomatic improvement than other factors, including the level of mandibular canal invasion. Additionally, increased pain intensity and decreased symptomatic improvement can be expected over time, because of this linear trend. Therefore, although direct injury to the nerve is the most important factor contributing to a neurosensory disturbances, early neurosensory assessment and initiation of conservative treatment should be done to optimize recovery.
Keywords
Dental implants; Mandibular nerve; Trigeminal nerve injuries;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Masson EA, Boulton AJ. The Neurometer: validation and comparison with conventional tests for diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1991;8 Spec No:S63-S66.   DOI
2 Masson EA, Veves A, Fernando D, Boulton AJ. Current perception thresholds: a new, quick, and reproducible method for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1989;32:724-728.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lamas Pelayo J, Penarrocha Diago M, Marti Bowen E, Penarrocha Diago M. Intraoperative complications during oral implantology. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E239-E243.
4 Carter RB, Keen EN. The intramandibular course of the inferior alveolar nerve. J Anat 1971;108:433-440.
5 Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, Sanchez-Perez A, Moya-Villaescusa MJ, Rodriguez-Lozano A, Saez-Yuguero MR. Neuropathic orofacial pain after dental implant placement: review of the literature and case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e8-e12.   DOI
6 Hirsch JM, Branemark PI. Fixture stability and nerve function after transposition and lateralization of the inferior alveolar nerve and fixture installation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;33:276-281.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Miloro M, Halkias LE, Slone HW, Chakeres DW. Assessment of the lingual nerve in the third molar region using magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:134-137.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1405-1411.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bartling R, Freeman K, Kraut RA. The incidence of altered sensation of the mental nerve after mandibular implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:1408-1412.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Burstein J, Mastin C, Le B. Avoiding injury to the inferior alveolar nerve by routine use of intraoperative radiographs during implant placement. J Oral Implantol 2008;34:34-38.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, et al. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:272-281.
12 Delcanho RE. Neuropathic implications of prosthodontic treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:146-152.   DOI
13 Anderson LC, Kosinski TF, Mentag PJ. A review of the intraosseous course of the nerves of the mandible. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:394-403.
14 Pogrel MA, Thamby S. The etiology of altered sensation in the inferior alveolar, lingual, and mental nerves as a result of dental treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 1999;27:531, 534-538.
15 Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Kalk W. Patients' perception of sensory disturbances of the mental nerve before and after implant surgery: a prospective study of 110 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;35:254-259.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-194.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Merrill RG. Prevention, treatment, and prognosis for nerve injury related to the difficult impaction. Dent Clin North Am 1979;23:471-488.
18 Ellies LG, Hawker PB. The prevalence of altered sensation associated with implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:674-679.
19 Benoliel R, Eliav E. Neuropathic orofacial pain. Alpha Omegan 2012;105:66-74.
20 Ryu JW, Kwon JS. Dysesthesia after tooth extraction and implant surgery reported by dentists. J Oral Med 2007;32:263-272.   과학기술학회마을
21 Hillerup S. Iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar nerve: etiology, signs and symptoms, and observations on recovery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:704-709.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Kraut RA, Chahal O. Management of patients with trigeminal nerve injuries after mandibular implant placement. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1351-1354.   DOI
23 Tay AB, Zuniga JR. Clinical characteristics of trigeminal nerve injury referrals to a university centre. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:922-927.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Park JH, Lee SH, Kim ST. Pharmacologic management of trigeminal nerve injury pain after dental implant surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:342-346.
25 Graff-Radford SB. Facial pain. Neurologist 2009;15:171-177.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Vickers ER, Cousins MJ. Neuropathic orofacial pain part 1--prevalence and pathophysiology. Aust Endod J 2000;26:19-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Smith SB, Maixner DW, Greenspan JD, et al. Potential genetic risk factors for chronic TMD: genetic associations from the OPPERA case control study. J Pain 2011;12(11 Suppl):T92-101.   DOI