Browse > Article

The Application of the Forensic Dental Identification to Unidentified Individual Remains in Korea  

Park, Hee-Kyung (Section of Forensic Dentistry, Department of Forensic Medicine National Institute of Scientific Investigation)
Publication Information
Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain / v.31, no.1, 2006 , pp. 27-36 More about this Journal
Abstract
The cases of unidentified individual remains submitted to Forensic dentistry section in National Institute of Scientific Investigation, Korea were analyzed to study the application of forensic dental identification into individual identification in the period 2002-2005. The identification cases of unidentified remains were 405 out of 493, which accounted about 82% of whole cases. The incidence of submission of skeletons at least including the skull was increased from 58% in 2002 to 80% in 2005. The numbers of cases for the full examinations were 4 times more than that for age estimation in 2005. Twenty-four cases were submitted for skull to photographic superimposition and 15 out of 24 cases were examined, and the other 9 cases were examined by DNA analysis only. The submitted cases for dental comparison were 23 cases, 9 cases were positively identified, 4 cases were possible, 7 cases were excluded, and 3 cases ended up with insufficient evidences. The proportion of positive identification by dental methods was increased gradually from 9% in 2002 to 46% in 2005. Forensic dental identification has become important and useful because the availability of dental records and radiographs has been increasing. Compared to DNA analysis, forensic dental identification has several advantages such as no needs for high cost equipments and low expenses. And the interpretation of results is straightforward and speedy. These advantages are based on using primary their own dental records of the individuals rather than secondary DNA reference samples from family members. The application of the forensic dental identification to unidentified individual remains will be increased because the dental comparison can complement the limitation of DNA analysis and skull to photographic superimposition in many cases. In order to obtain positive identifications of unidentified remains, a close collaboration between the police and forensic scientists is important. The systemic approach including legislation to preserve dental records of unidentified remains and missing persons for the identification of unidentified remains should be needed.
Keywords
Forensic; Dental identification; Unidentified remains; Dental records;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brannon RB, Morlang WM. The crash of LOT flight 007: Dental identification. Forensic Sci Int 2002;47:1323-1325
2 Lewis JA Jr, Shiroma CY, Guenthner KV, Dun KN. Recovery and identification of the victims of the Ehime Mary/USS Greenville collision at sea. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:539-542
3 Haines DH. Dental identification in the Rijeka air disaster. J Forensic Sci 1972;1:313-321   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Shahrom AW, Vanezis P, Chapman RC, et al. Techniques in facial identification: computer-aided facial reconstruction using a laser scanner and video superimposition. Int J Legal Med 1996;108:194-200   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Duncan GT, Tracey ML, Stauffer E. Techniques of DNA analysis. In, James SH, Nordby JJ(Ed). Forensic science: An introduction to scientific and investigative techniques. Boca Raton, 2000, CRC press Inc., pp. 221-250
6 Jin HJ, Kwak KD, Hong SB et al. Forensic genetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA hypervariable region I/II sequences: An expanded Korean population database. Forensic Sci Int, in press
7 Harvey W. Identification after fire, drowning, air crasher, and other disasters. In Dental identification & forensic odontology. London, Henry Kimpton Publisher, 1976. pp. 67-87
8 Haglund WD. The national crime information center (NCIC) missing and unidentified persons system revisited. J Forensic Sci 1993;38:365-378
9 Austin-Smith D, Maples WR. The reliability of skull/photograph superimposition in individual identification. J Forensic Sci 1994;39:446-455
10 Weedn VW, DNA identification, In, Stimson PG, Mertz CA (Ed). Forensic dentistry, Boca Raton, 1997, CRC press Inc., pp. 37-46
11 Whittaker DK, MacDonald DG. A colour atlas of forensic dentistry. Ipswich, 1989, Wolfe Medical Publications Ltd., pp. 7-13
12 Lee HC, Ladd C, Scherczinger CA et al. Forensic application of DNA typing: Part 2. Collection and preservation of DNA evidence. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1998;19:10-18   DOI   ScienceOn
13 McGivney J, Fixott RH. Computer-assisted dental identification, In, Fixott RH (Ed). The dental clinics of north America Forensic odontology, Vol 45, Philadelphia, 2001, W. B. Saunders Company, pp.309-325
14 Park HK. Portable digital x-ray system for the forensic dental identification. Kor J Forensic Sci 2005;6:101-105
15 Gustafson G. Forensic odontology. London, 1966, Staples press, pp. 24-139
16 Maat GJR. The positioning and magnification of faces and skulls for photographic superimposition. Forensic Sci Int 1989;41:225-235   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sen NK. Identification by superimposed photographs. Int Criminal Police Review 1962;162:284-286
18 Ubelaker DH, Bubniak E, O'Donnell G. Computerassisted photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1992;37:750-762
19 Kringsholm B, jakobse J, Sejrsen B, Gregersen M. Unidentified bodies/skulls found in Danish waters in the period 1992-1996. Forensic Sci Int 2001;123:150-158   DOI
20 Brannon RB, Morlang WM, Smith BC. The gander disaster: Dental identification in a military tragedy. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:1331-1335
21 Douglas WO. Identification of the fragmentary, burned remains of two US journalists seven years after their disappearance in Guatemala. J Forensic Sci 2003;38:1372-1382
22 Saukko P, Knight B. The establishment of identity of human remains. In, Knight's forensic pathology, 3rd ed., London, 2004, Arnold Inc., pp. 98-135
23 McGivney J, Facial superimposition, In, Bowers CM, Bell GL(Ed), Manual of forensic odontology 3rd ed., Colorado Springs, 1995, A publication of the American society of forensic odontology, pp. 42-446
24 Bell GL. Computer aided forensic odontology. In, Bowers CM, Bell GL(Ed). Manual of forensic odontology. 3rd ed., Colorado Springs, 1995, A publication of the American society of forensic odontology, pp. 200-226
25 Harvey W. Dental identification & forensic odontology. London, 1976, Henry Kimpton Publisher, pp. 1-6
26 Delattre VF. Burned beyond recognition: Systemic approach to the dental identification of charred human remains. J Forensic Sci 2000;45:589-596
27 Gruner O. Identification of skulls: A historical review and practical applications. In, Iscan MY, Helmer RP (Ed). Forensic analysis of the skull: Craniofacial analysis, reconstruction, and identification. New York, 1993, Wiley-Liss Inc., pp. 29-45
28 Kim HJ, Kang MG, Choi JH, Kim CY. Image superimposition for the individual identification using computer vision system. Korean J Oral Med 1996;21:37-54
29 Keiser-Nielson S. Teeth that told. 1992, Odense University Press, pp 5-7
30 Clark DH. An analysis of the value of forensic odontology in ten mass disasters. Int Dent J 1994;44:241-250
31 Fisher BAJ. Establishing identity. In, Techniques of crime scene investigation. 6th ed., Boca Raton, 2000, CRC press Inc., pp. 99-159
32 Hagelberg E, Gray IC, Jeffreys AJ. Identification of the skeletal remains of a murder victim by DNA analysis. Nature 1991;352:427-429   DOI