Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0057-3

Sensitivity of Seismic Response and Fragility to Parameter Uncertainty of Single-Layer Reticulated Domes  

Zhong, Jie (School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University)
Zhi, Xudong (Key Laboratory of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology)
Fan, Feng (Key Laboratory of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology)
Publication Information
International journal of steel structures / v.18, no.5, 2018 , pp. 1607-1616 More about this Journal
Abstract
Quantitatively modeling and propagating all sources of uncertainty stand at the core of seismic fragility assessment of structures. This paper investigates the effects of various sources of uncertainty on seismic responses and seismic fragility estimates of single-layer reticulated domes. Sensitivity analyses are performed to examine the sensitivity of typical seismic responses to uncertainties in structural modeling parameters, and the results suggest that the variability in structural damping, yielding strength, steel ultimate strain, dead load and snow load has significant effects on the seismic responses, and these five parameters should be taken as random variables in the seismic fragility assessment. Based on this, fragility estimates and fragility curves incorporating different levels of uncertainty are obtained on the basis of the results of incremental dynamic analyses on the corresponding set of 40 sample models generated by Latin Hypercube Sampling method. The comparisons of these fragility curves illustrate that, the inclusion of only ground motion uncertainty is inappropriate and inadequate, and the appropriate way is incorporating the variability in the five identified structural modeling parameters as well into the seismic fragility assessment of single-layer reticulated domes.
Keywords
Sensitivity analysis; Seismic fragility curves; Structural modeling uncertainties; Incremental dynamic analysis; Single-layer reticulated domes;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Nie, G. B., Zhi, X. D., Fan, F., & Dai, J. W. (2014). Seismic performance evaluation of single-layer reticulated dome and its fragility analysis. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 100, 176-182.   DOI
2 Padgett, J. E., & DesRoches, R. (2007). Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(12), 1710-1718.   DOI
3 Park, J., Towashiraporn, P., Craig, J. I., & Goodno, B. J. (2009). Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures. Engineering Structures, 31(1), 125-137.   DOI
4 Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L. & Shaikhutdinov, R. V. (2002). Investigation of sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables for the Van Nuys testbed. PEER technical report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Richmond, CA, USA.
5 Ramanathan, K., Padgett, J. E., & DesRoches, R. (2015). Temporal evolution of seismic fragility curves for concrete box-girder bridges in California. Engineering Structures, 97, 29-46.   DOI
6 Shah, H. C., Bao, A. B., & Dong, W. M. (1982). Implications and application of Bayesian model for seismic hazard analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2(4), 1-15.
7 Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491-514.   DOI
8 Wang, D. (2006). Probabilistic risk analysis of steel frame structures (pp. 18-19). Harbin: Dissertation of Harbin Institute of Technology.
9 Xie, L. L., & Ma, Y. H. (2002). Studies on performance-based seismic design criterion. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 24(2), 200-209.
10 Zhi, X. D., Nie, G. B., Fan, F., & Shen, S. Z. (2012). Vulnerability and risk assessment of single-layer reticulated domes subjected to earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(12), 1505-1514.   DOI
11 Zhong, J., Zhi, X. D., & Fan, F. (2016). A dominant vibration modebased scalar ground motion intensity measure for single-layer reticulated domes. Earthquakes and Structures, 11(2), 245-264.   DOI
12 Zhong, J., Zhang, J. P., Zhi, X. D., & Fan, F. (2018). Identification of dominant modes of single-layer reticulated shells under seismic excitations. Thin-Walled Structures, 127, 676-687.   DOI
13 FEMA. (1997). NEHRP guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA - 273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
14 Celik, O. C., & Ellingwood, B. R. (2010). Seismic fragilities for nonductile reinforced concrete frames: Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Structural Safety, 32, 1-12.   DOI
15 Chen, G. B., Zhang, H., Rasmussen, K. J. R., & Fan, F. (2014). Modelling geometric imperfections of spatial latticed structures considering correlations of node imperfections. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 553, 576-581.   DOI
16 Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., & Foutch, D. A. (2002). Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4), 526-533.   DOI
17 Ellingwood, B. R., & Kinali, K. (2009). Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment. Structural Safety, 31, 179-187.   DOI
18 Fan, F., Yan, J. C., & Cao, Z. G. (2012). Elasto-plastic stability of single-layer reticulated domes with initial curvature of members. Thin-Walled Structures, 60, 239-246.   DOI
19 GB50009. (2012). Load code for the design of building structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
20 Gao, X. W., & Bao, A. B. (1985). Probabilistic model and its statistical parameters for seismic load. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 5(3), 13-22.
21 Helton, J. C., & Davis, F. J. (2003). Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 81, 23-69.   DOI
22 JCSS. (2001). Probabilistic model code, Part 3: Resistance models, static properties of structural steel (rolled sections). JCSS Zurich. Available from Internet: http://www.jcss.ethz.ch/.
23 Lee, D. H., Kim, B. H., Jeong, S. H., Jeon, J. S., & Lee, T. H. (2016). Seismic fragility analysis of a buried gas pipeline based on nonlinear time-history analysis. International Journal of Steel Structures, 16(1), 231-242.   DOI
24 JGJ7. (2010). Technical specification for space frame structure. Beijing: China Architecture Industry Press.
25 Kiureghian, A. D., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31, 105-112.   DOI
26 Kwon, O. S., & Elnashai, A. (2006). The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Engineering Structures, 28(2), 289-303.   DOI
27 Lee, T. H., & Mosalam, K. M. (2005). Seismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear-wall building using FOSM method. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34, 1719-1736.   DOI
28 Moehle, J. & Deierlein, G. G. (2004). A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. In Proc. 13th world conf. on earthquake engineering, CD-ROM, Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering, Canada, pp. 3812-3814.