Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13296-011-2002-6

Experimental Investigation of Steel Frames Braced with Symmetrical Pairs of y-shaped Concentric Bracings  

Zamani, Sohail Majid (Civil Eng., Faculty, Sharif Univ. of Technology)
Vafaei, Abolhassan (Civil Eng., Faculty, Sharif Univ. of Technology)
Aghakouchak, A. A. (Faculty of Civil Eng., Tarbiat Modarres Univ.)
Desai, Chandrakant (Civil Eng. & Eng. Mechanics Dept., Univ. of Arizona)
Publication Information
International journal of steel structures / v.11, no.2, 2011 , pp. 117-131 More about this Journal
Abstract
Concentric bracings composed of three members arranged in y shaped geometry have been traditionally used to provide openings in braced bays. However, simultanous occurance of compression in three braces leads to instability and out of plane buckling of braces accompanied by low hysteretic energy absorption. In order to study the behavior of y-braced frames, a research program including experimental tests was conducted at BHRC structural engineering laboratory. Quasi-static cyclic loading was applied to specimens including four full-scale two-bay frames with y-bracings of different cross sections and connection types.The bays are braced symmetrically to have a combination of tensile and compressive braces at all loading stages. The results show that out-of-plane buckling with single curvature in braces can be substituted by in plane, double curvature buckling through appropriate detailing of cross sections and connections.Thus, hysteretic energy dissipation of ybracing is remarkably improved due to spreading of plastic strains in braces. In this paper, seismic performance of y-braced frame specimens and a reference X-braced frame are also assessed by capacity spectrum method.
Keywords
steel; concentric; bracing; buckling; inelastic; hysteretic;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 AISC (2005a). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
2 AISC (2005b). Specification for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
3 Annan, C. D., Youssef, M. A., and El Naggar, M. H. (2009). "Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of modular steel-braced frames." Engineering Structures, 31, pp. 1435-1446.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 ASCE (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE 7-05). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
5 AWS (2004). Structural welding code-steel (AWS D1.1). American Welding Society.
6 Badpar, A. (1996). Investigation of behavior of y-shaped bracing. Msc. Thesis, Tehran University (in Persian).
7 BSI (2001). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3, British Standards Institute, London, UK.
8 BSI (2004). BS EN 10025-2: Hot rolled products of structural steel-technical delivery condition for non-alloy structural steel. British Standards Institute, London, UK.
9 Clough, R. W. and Penzien, J. (1975). Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 75.
10 Davaran, A. and Hoveidae, N. (2009). "Effect of midconnection detail on the behavior of X-bracing systems." Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65, pp. 985-990.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 FEMA 356 (2000). PreStandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
12 Lehman, D., Roeder, C. W., Herman, D., Johnson, S., and Kotulka, B. (2008). "Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections." Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 134(6), pp. 890-901.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Mahaney, J. A., Parret, T. F., Kehoe, B. E., and Freeman, S. A. (1993). "The capacity spectrum method for evaluating structural response during the loma prieta earthquake." Proc. National Earthquake Conference, Memphis, USA.
14 Majid Zamani, S. and Rasouli, M. (2006). "Experimental investigation of behavior of y-shaped concentric steel bracings." Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, Building and Housing Research Center, 7(1), pp. 81-94.
15 Moghaddam, H. A. and Estekanchi, H. E. (1999). "Seismic behavior of off-centre bracing systems." Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 51(2), pp. 177-196.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J. (1982). Earthquake spectra and design. EERI Monograph Series, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California.
17 Patxi, U. and Mahin, S. A. (2004). "Physical modeling and seismic vulnerability assessment of concentrically braced steel frames." Proc. SEAOC Annual Convention, Monterrey, California.
18 Saffari, H. and Yazdi, H. M. (2010). "An efficient and direct method for out-of-plane buckling analysis of Y-braced steel frames." Journal of Constructional Steel Research, doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.012.
19 Salmon, C. G. and Johnson, J. E. (2009). Steel structures design and behaviour. Prentice Hall, USA.
20 Sontag, S., Henn, W., and Hart, F. (1985). Multi storey buildings in steel, 2nd edition. Collins, London , pp. 252- 257.
21 Taranath, S. (1998). Steel, concrete and composite design of tall buildings, second edition. McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 423-428.
22 Tremblay, R. and Robert, N. (2000). "Seismic design of low and mid-rise chevron braced steel frames." Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 27, pp. 1192-1206.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Yoo, J. H., Roeder, C. W., and Lehman, D. E. (2009). "Simulated behavior of multi-story X-braced frames." Engineering Structures, 31, pp. 182-197.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Yaseri, S. and Shasb, F. R. (2001). Design and calculation of heavy and light industrial steel buildings. Dehkhoda Press, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).