Browse > Article

Cyclic Seismic Testing of Concrete-filled U-shaped Steel Beam-to-Steel Column Connections  

Park, Hong-Gun (서울대학교 건축학과)
Lee, Cheol-Ho (서울대학교 건축학과)
Park, Chang-Hee (서울대학교 건축학과)
Hwang, Hyeon-Jong (서울대학교 건축학과)
Lee, Chang-Nam ((주)센구조연구소)
Kim, Hyoung-Seop ((주)센구조연구소)
Kim, Sung-Bae ((주)센구조연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction / v.23, no.3, 2011 , pp. 337-347 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, seismic resistance of concrete encased U-shaped steel beam-to-steel H-shaped column connections was evaluated. Three specimens of the beam-to-column connection were tested under cyclic loading. The composite beam was integrated with concrete slab using studs. Re-bars for negative moment were placed in the slab. The primary test parameter was the details of the connections, which are strengthening and weakening strategies for the beam end and the degree of composite action. The depth of the composite beams was 600mm including the slab thickness. The steel beam and the re-bars in the slab were weld-connected to the steel column. For the strengthening strategy, cover plates were weld-connected to the bottom and top flanges of the steel beam. For the weakening strategy, a void using styrofoam box was located inside the core concrete at the potential plastic hinge zone. The test results showed that the fully composite specimens exhibited good strength, deformation, and energy dissipation capacities. The deformation capacity of the beam exceeded 4% rotation angle, which is the requirement for the Special Moment Frame.
Keywords
beam-column connection; U-shaped section; seismic connection; seismic test; special moment frame;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김성배, 함정태, 이창남, 김상섭(2006) SRC 기둥-TSC 보접합부의 거동에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집, 대한건축학회, 제22권, 제6호, pp.55-62.   과학기술학회마을
2 대한건축학회(2010) 건축구조기준 및 해석 (KBC2009) 기문당.
3 황현종, 박홍근, 이철호, 박창희, 이창남, 김형섭, 김성배 (2011) 콘크리트채움 U형 강재보-콘크리트 기둥 접합부의 내진성능, 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회, 제23권, 제1호, pp.83-97.
4 American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2008) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary, ACI Committee 318.
5 American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2005) Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, Chicago
6 Anderson, D.and Najafi, A.A.(1994) Performance of Composite Connections: Major Axis End Plate Joints, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, ELSEVIER, Vol.31, No.1, pp.31-57.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Leon,R.T.(1990) Semi-Rigid Composite Construction, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, ELSEVIER, Vol.15, No.1, pp.99-120.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Leon,R.T.(1998) Composite connections,Structural Engineering and Materials, Construction Research Communications, Vol.1, No.2, pp.159-169.
9 Park, R. (1988) State-of-the Art Report: Ductility Evaluation from Laboratory and Analytical Testing, Proceedings of 9th World Conferenceon Earthquake Engineering, Vol.8, pp.605-616
10 Vasdravellis, G.,Valente, M., and Castiglioni,C.A.(2009) Dynamic response of composite frames with differentshear connection degree, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, ELSEVIER, Vol. 65, No.10, pp.2050-2061.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Xiao, Y., Choo, B.S., and Nethercot, D.A. (1994) Composite Connections in Steeland Concrete.I. Experimental Behavior of Composite Beam-Column Connections, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, ELSEVIER, Vol.31, No.1, pp.3-30.   DOI   ScienceOn