Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2012.43.2.001

A Study on the Evaluation Criteria for Setting up the Priority of Archiving Different Types of Digital Contents  

Kim, Jin-Mook (강남대학교 인문대학 문헌정보학과)
Choi, Jae-Hwang (경북대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
Kwak, Seung-Jin (충남대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Management / v.43, no.2, 2012 , pp. 1-22 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide a theoretical basis for archiving the digital contents in Science and Technology. We first examined the evaluation criteria for archiving different types of digital contents by using quantitative research methods, like a user survey. We then further investigated how participants perceived each evaluation criterion by adopting qualitative research methods, like a focus group discussion. Also, we presented an evaluation model for setting up the priority of digital archiving among various types of digital contents.
Keywords
Digital Archiving; Evaluation Criteria; Types of Digital Contents; Science and Technology Contents; KISTI;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 정영미, 윤화묵, 김정택. 2010. 디지털 콘텐츠의 무결성 유지를 위한 장기적인 보존 정책에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 41(4):205-226.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Ayris, P. 1998. Guidance for Selecting Materials for Digitization. In Proceedings of Joint RLG and NPO Preservation Conference, University of Warwick.
3 Crane, D. 1969. "Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the "Invisible College" Hypothesis." American Sociological Review, no.34: 335-352.
4 Garvey, W. D. 1979. Communication: The Essence of Science. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press Inc.
5 Glasser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
6 Guba, E. G. 1981. "Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries." Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2): 75-91.
7 Morgan, D. L. 1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Qualitative Research Series, 16. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8 Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9 Patton, M. 2001. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10 Rice, R. E. and P. Tarin. 1993. "Staying Informed: Scientific Communication and Use of Information Sources within Disciplines." In Proceedings of American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting, 30: 160-164.
11 Wilson, T. D. 1981. "On user studies and information needs." Journal of Documentation, 37(1): 3-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 곽승진, 성원경, 배경재. 2011. 디지털 콘텐츠 수명주기 모델 분석 및 평가에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 42(1): 25-46.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
13 설문원, 이소연, 이용훈, 이미화, 김명훈, 이윤주, 현문수, 이경남, 서석제. 2005. 국가 디지털 아카이빙 체제 구축에 관한 연구. 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI).