Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2021.48.4.217

Comparative Analysis of Physicochemical Traits and Fatty Acid Composition of Chicken Meat from New Strain of Korean Native Chickens  

Shin, Dong-Jin (Department of Applied Animal Science, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Hye-Jin (Department of Applied Animal Science, Kangwon National University)
Kwon, Ji-Seon (Department of Applied Animal Science, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Dongwook (Department of Applied Animal Science, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Hee-Jin (Poultry Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science)
Choo, Hyo-Jun (Poultry Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science)
Jung, Jong-Hyun (Jung P&C Institute, Inc.)
Jang, Aera (Department of Applied Animal Science, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Poultry Science / v.48, no.4, 2021 , pp. 217-225 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study compares the physicochemical characteristics and fatty acid composition of three Korean native chickens and broilers. Ten whole raw broiler chickens and ten each from the three Korean native chickens (KNCs), Hanhyup 3 (HH3), Woormatdak 1 (WRMD1), and Woormatdak 2 (WRMD2), were purchased from the meat market. Their breast and thigh meat were used as samples. The proximate composition, pH, color, water-holding capacity (WHC), shear force, collagen content, and fatty acid composition were determined. In breast meat, the moisture content of HH3 (74.94%) and WRMD1 (74.74%) was lower than that of the broilers (77.1%, P<0.05). No significant difference was found in crude protein, lipids, and ash contents. The crude fat from thigh meat from HH3 and WRMD2 was lower than that of broilers (P<0.05). The redness of WRMD1 was the highest in both breast and thigh meat (P<0.05). The WHC of the breast meat of WRMD1 was lower than that of HH3 and WRMD2. In thigh meat, the WHC of the broilers was significantly higher than that of the KNCs. In breast meat, the shear force of WRMD2 was significantly lower than that of the broilers, HH3, and WRMD1, while no significant difference was found in thigh meat. The collagen content and arachidonic acid levels of the KNCs were significantly higher than those of the broilers for breast and thigh meats. No significant differences were observed among the KNCs. This result can be used to improve the quality of KNC but further studies on the bioactive compounds, taste, and volatile compounds of KNCs are required.
Keywords
Korean native chicken; physicochemical traits; fatty acid composition; Woorimatdag; Hanhyup 3;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Chae H, Cho S, Park B, Yoo Y, Kim J, Ahn C, Lee J, Kim Y, Choi Y 2002 Changes of the fatty acid, amino acids and collagen contents in domestic broiler chickens of different marketing standard. Food Sci Anim Resour 22(1):1-7.
2 Choe JH, Nam KC, Jung S, Kim BN, Yun HJ, Jo C 2010 Differences in the quality characteristics between commercial Korean native chickens and broilers. Korean J Food Sci Anim 30(1):13-19.   DOI
3 Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley G 1957 Extraction of fatty acid. J Biol Chem 226:497-509.   DOI
4 Jayasena DD, Ahn DU, Nam KC, Jo C 2013 Flavour chemistry of chicken meat: a review. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 26(5):732.   DOI
5 Jin S, Jayasena DD, Jo C, Lee JH 2017 The breeding history and commercial development of the Korean native chicken. World Poult Sci 73(1):163-174.   DOI
6 Shin DJ, Yim DG, Kwon JA. Kim SS, Lee HJ, Jo C 2021 Effect of cutting time and cooking temperature on physicochemical properties of chicken breast meat emulsion sausage with olive oil. Poult Sci 101(1):101554.
7 Kim HC, Choe J, Nam KC, Jung S, Jo C 2018 Productivity and meat quality of the new crossbred Korean native chickens compared with commercial breeds. Korean J Poult Sci 45(2):125-135.   DOI
8 Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Jeon J, Nam KC, Shim KS, Jung JH, Jang A 2020 Comparison of the quality characteristics of chicken breast meat from conventional and animal welfare farms under refrigerated storage. Poult Sci 99(3):1788-1796.   DOI
9 Lee KH, Jung YK, Jung S, Lee JH, Heo KN, Jo CR 2011 Physiochemical characteristics of the meat from Korean native chicken and broiler reared and slaughtered as the same conditions. Korean J Poult Sci 38(3):225-230.   DOI
10 Oh ST, Jhun HK, Park JM, Kim JM, Kang CW, An BK 2012 Effects of dietary sources containing ω-3 fatty acids on the fatty acid composition of meats in Korean native chickens. Food Sci Ani Resour 32(4):476-482.   DOI
11 Le Bihan-Duval E, Debut M, Berri CM, Sellier N, Sante-Lhoutellier V, Jego Y, Beaumont C 2008 Chicken meat quality: genetic variability and relationship with growth and muscle characteristics. BMC genetics 9(1):1-6.
12 AOAC 1995 Official Methods of Analysis. 6th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.
13 Kim KG, Choi ES, Kwon JH, Jung HC, Sohn SH 2019 Production performance of 12 Korean domestic chicken varieties preserved as national genetic resources. Korean J Poult Sci 46(2):105-115.   DOI
14 Lee SY, Park JY, Hyun JM, Jung S, Jo C, Nam KC 2018 Comparative analysis of meat quality traits of new strains of native chickens for Samgyetang. Korean J Poult Sci 45(3):175-182.   DOI
15 Mir NA, Rafiq A, Kumar F, Singh V, Shukla V 2017 Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review. J Food Sci Technol, 54(10):2997-3009.   DOI
16 Lee KH, Kim HJ, Lee HJ, Kang MG, Jo CR 2012 A study on components related to flavor and taste in commercial broiler and Korean native chicken meat. Korean J Food Preserv 19(3):385-392.   DOI
17 Nam KC 2017 Development of new chicken breeds to diversify consumer market. Food Sci Anim Resour Ind 6(1):17-23.
18 OECD/FAO 2020. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020-2029, OECD. Pages 1-330.
19 Rikimaru K, Takahashi H 2010 Evaluation of the meat from Hinai-jidori chickens and broilers: analysis of general biochemical components, free amino acids, inosine 5'-mo- nophosphate, and fatty acids. J Appl Poult Res 19(4): 327-333.   DOI
20 Choe JH, Nam KC, Jung S, Kim BN, Yun HJ, Jo C 2010 Differences in the quality characteristics between commercial Korean native chickens and broilers. Korean J Food Sci Anim 30(1):13-19.   DOI
21 Jeon HJ, Choe JH, Jung YK, Kruk ZA, Lim DG, Jo C 2010 Comparison of the chemical composition, textural characteristics, and sensory properties of north and south Korean native chickens and commercial broilers. Food Sci Anim Resour 30(2):171-178.   DOI
22 Kweon YJ, Yeo JS, Sung SK 1995 Quality characteristics of Korean native chicken meat. Korean J Poult Sci 22(4):223-231.
23 Sang BD, Kong HS, Kim HK, Choi CH, Kim SD, Cho YM, Sang BC, Lee JH, Jeon GJ, Lee HK 2006 Estimation of genetic parameters for economic traits in Korean native chickens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 19(3):319.   DOI
24 Gang BS 2011 The story of chicken by the National Institute of Animal Science - Development and industrialization of "Woorimatdag". Monthly Korean Chicken 17(11):98-101.
25 Kim HJ, Kim D, Shin JS, Jang A 2017 Effects of dietary chitosan and probiotics on the quality and physicochemical characteristics in Hanwoo striploin. J Agric Life Sci 51(5):115-128.
26 Lee SY, Park JY, Nam KC 2019 Comparison of micronutrients and flavor compounds in breast meat of native chicken strains and Baeksemi for Samgyetang. Korean J Poult Sci 46(4):255-262.   DOI
27 Liu F, Meng L, Gao X, Li X, Luo H, Dai R 2013 Effect of end point temperature on cooking losses, shear force, color, protein solubility and microstructure of goat meat. J Food Process Preserv 37(3):275-283.   DOI