Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2017.44.2.123

Production Performances and Heterosis Effects of Korean Native Chicken Breed Combinations by Diallel Crossing Test  

Choi, Eun Sik (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Bang, Min Hee (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Kim, Ki Gon (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Kwon, Jae Hyun (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Chung, Ok Young (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Sohn, Sea Hwan (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Poultry Science / v.44, no.2, 2017 , pp. 123-134 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to establish new synthetic lines of Korean Native Chicken. We performed $5{\times}5$ diallel crossings with GPS lines of Korean Native Chicken for the selection of parent stock. The production traits including viability, body weight, age at first egg laying, egg weight, hen-day egg production, and hen-housed egg production were measured and analyzed for 25 crosses with 1,157 hens. The heterosis effects of these traits were also estimated. The results showed that the average survival rate during laying periods was 67.7% in the pure lines and 77.1% in the crosses. The 25 cross combinations were shown to be distinctly divided into three groups according to body weight; nine crosses in the high-weight group, 12 crosses in the medium-weight group and four crosses in the light-weight group. The average body weight at 12 weeks of age was $1,873.8{\pm}43.0g$ in the high group, $1,595.4{\pm}56.6g$ in the medium group and $1,152.7{\pm}24.7g$ in the light group, and $1,560.2{\pm}339.3g$ in the pure lines and $1,640.9{\pm}213.7g$ in the crosses. In terms of egg production performance, the age at first egg laying was $139.7{\pm}4.9$ days in the pure lines and $135.8{\pm}5.1$ days in the crosses. The average egg weight was $52.3{\pm}1.6g$ in the pure line and $53.0{\pm}1.6g$ in the crosses. The average hen-housed egg production from 20 to 40 weeks was $58.3{\pm}12.9$ eggs in the pure line and $69.2{\pm}10.4$ eggs in the crosses. The average heterosis effect was 16.9% for survival rate, 5.4% for body weight at 12 weeks, -2.7% for age at first egg laying, 1.3% for egg weight, and 14.3% for hen-day egg production. Generally, the heterosis effect for viability and egg production traits was higher than that for growth trait. On the basis of these results, it is expected that the selection of the HF combination, which had excellent growth performance, is the most desirable as the paternal strain, and the selection of GW and FW combinations, which had excellent laying performance, are preferable as the maternal strain.
Keywords
Korean Native Chicken; heterosis; production performance; diallel cross mating;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sohn SH, Cho EJ, Park JA, Hong YH, Kim CD 2015 Analysis of stress response of domestic chicken breeds for the development of a new synthetic parent stock. Korean J. Poult Sci 42(2):157-167.   DOI
2 Soleimani AF, Zulkifli I, Omar AR, Raha AR 2011 Physiological responses of 3 chicken breeds to acute heat stress. Poult Sci 90(7):1435-1440.   DOI
3 Tamzil MH, Noor RR, Hardjosworo PS, Manalu W, Sumantri C 2013 Acute heat stress responses of three lines of chickens with different heat shock protein(HSP)-70 genotypes. Int J Poult Sci 12(5):264-272.   DOI
4 Wearden S, Craig JV, Tindell D 1967 Components of specific combining ability estimated from strain and breed crosses in chickens. Poult Sci 46(6):1398-1406.   DOI
5 Cheong IC, Chung SB, Yeon SH 1985 Estimation of heterosis from strain crosses of White crosses and White Plymouth Rock for certain economic traits. Korean J Poult Sci 12(2):75-82.
6 Kang BS, Cheong IC, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Ohh BK, Choi KS 1997a Estimation of heterosis for some economic traits in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and Rhode Island Red I. Hatching and growing performance in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and Rhode Island Red. Korean J Poult Sci 24(3):117-126.
7 Cho EJ, Park JA, Choi ES, Sohn SH 2016 Comparison of stress response in diallel crossed Korean domestic chicken breeds. Korean J Poult Sci 43(2):77-88.   DOI
8 Choi CH 2002 Estimation of heterosis and combining abilities for important traits from strain crosses in Korean native chicken. M. D. Dissertation. Chungnam National University.
9 Hong EC, Choo Hj, Kim HK, Kim CD, Heo KN, Lee MJ, Son BR, Suh OS, Choi HC, Kang BS 2012 Performance of growing period of two-way crossbreed parent stock for producing of laying-type Korean native commercial chickens. Korean J Poult Sci 39(3):177-182.   DOI
10 Kang BS, Cheong IC, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Ohh BK, Choi KS 1997b Estimation of heterosis for some economic traits in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and Rhode Island Red II. Laying performance of Korean native chicken and Rhode Island Red crossbreds. Korean J Poult Sci 24(3):127-137.
11 Ohh BK, Han JY, Sohn SH, Park TJ 1986 Estimation of genetic variations and selection of superior lines from diallel crosses in layer chicken. Korean J Poult Sci 13(1):1-14.
12 Kang BS, Hong EC, Kim HK, Kim CD, Heo KN, Choo HJ, Suh OS, Hwangbo J 2011 Productivity and performance test of egg-type commercial Korean native chickens. Korean J Poult Sci 38(4):331-338.   DOI
13 Lee MJ, Heo KN, Choi HC, Hong EC, Kim CD 2014 The performance test in crossbreds of Korean native chickens for the establishment of new lines. Korean J Poult Sci 41(1):39-44.   DOI
14 Lee MJ, Kim SH, Heo KN, Kim HK, Choi HC, Hong EC, Choo HJ, Kim CD 2013 The study on productivity of commercial chickens for crossbred Korean native chickens. Korean J Poult Sci 40(40):291-297.   DOI
15 Manjula P, Park HB, Yoo JH, Wickramasuriya S, Seo DW, Choi NR, Kim CD, Kang BS, Oh KS, Sohn SH, Heo JM, Lee JH 2016 Comparative study on growth patterns of 25 commercial strains of Korean Native Chicken. Korean J Poult Sci 43(1):1-14.   DOI
16 Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA) 2016 Major Statistics of Agriculture, Livestock and Food. Issues 11-1543000-000128-12.
17 Ohh BK, Yeo JS, Lee JK, Lee MY 1980 Study on utilization of heterosis in layer chicken. Korean J Poult Sci 7(2):28-36.
18 Park JA, Cho EJ, Choi ES, Hong YH, Choi YH, Sohn SH 2016 The relationship of the expressions of stress-related markers and their production performances in Korean domestic chicken breed. Korean J Poult Sci 43(3):177-189.   DOI
19 Sang BD, Choi CH, Kim HK, Na JC, Kim SH, Song CE, Chung HK, Sang BC, Han SW 2000 Estimation of genetic parameters for economic traits in Korean Native Chicken using multiple trait animal model. Korean J Poult Sci 27(1):51-56.
20 Shull GH 1914 Duplicate genes for capsule-form in Bursa pastoris. Zeitschrift ind. Abst u Verebsgl 12:97-149.