Browse > Article

The Effect of Food Waste on the Performance and the Egg Quality in Laying Hens  

HwangBo, J. (National Livestock Research Institute)
Lee, S.J. (National Livestock Research Institute)
Lee, B.S. (National Livestock Research Institute)
Lee, H.J. (National Livestock Research Institute)
Cho, S.B. (National Livestock Research Institute)
Kim, H.K. (National Livestock Research Institute)
Lee, S.U. (National Livestock Research Institute)
Hong, E.C. (National Livestock Research Institute)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Poultry Science / v.33, no.3, 2006 , pp. 217-224 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was carried out to investigate the effect of food-waste(FW) between weeks(0, 1, 2, 3, 4 week) and additive levels(0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 20%) on egg production and egg qualify in laying hens. One hundred sixty two White Leghorn laying hens at fifty weeks of age were used for this work. There was no significant difference on feed intake, egg production, and egg weight among all treatments. But, 20% FW group was decreased at 1, 2, and 3 week on egg production and it was recovered at 4 weeks(p<0.05). There was no difference on the eggshell thickness and egg yolk index among all treatments. However, eggshell breaking strength were $4.13kg/cm^2\;and\;4.04kg/cm^2$ at 3 week and 4 week, individually, and there was difference on eggshell breaking strength(p<0.05). Haugh unit and egg yolk color were high at 20% FW group as 92.3 and 9.4, individually, and there was shown the significant increasing in weeks and additive levels(p<0.05). Conclusionally, 20% FW group was decreased on egg production, while 5% FW group was maintained on egg production, and haugh unit and egg yolk color were cleary developed. Therefore, if the nutrients balance of FW diets were controlled, FW diets will be used with one of the valuable feed sources.
Keywords
Food waste; egg production; egg qualify; feed intake; laying hens;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cole DSA, Haresign W 1989 Recent developments in poultry nutrition. p. 145
2 Ehtesham A, Chowdhury SD 2002 Response of laying chickens to diets formulated by following different feeding standards. 1(3):127-131
3 Kawada T, Wantabe T, Takkaishi T, Tanaka T, Iwai K 1986 Capsaicin-induced ${\beta}$-adrenergic action on energy metabolism in rats ; Influence of capsaicin on oxygen consumption, the respiratory quotienty, and substrate utilization. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 183:250-256
4 Miki W 1991 Biological function and activities of carotenoids. Pure Appl Chem. 63:141   DOI
5 Soliman AA, Khaleel AR, Hamdy S, Abaza MA, EI-shazly K, Abou Akkada AR 1978 The use of restaurant food waste in poultry nutrition. II. Effect on laying hens. Alex J Agric Res 26:501-514
6 Tee ES 1992 Carotenoids and retinoids in human nutrition. Cri Rev Food Sci Nutr 31:103   DOI   ScienceOn
7 김동훈 1990 식품화학 탐구당 pp. 50
8 정승헌, 이상락, 김철, 안정제, 맹원재, 권윤정 2000 남은 음식물 발효사료가 산란계의 난생산성과 계란품질에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 27:7-12
9 황보종 홍의철 노환국 이병석 배해득 최낙진 정준용 강환구 장애라 박병성 2005a 사료내 염분 함량이 육계와 산란계의 생산성에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 32(3):195-202   과학기술학회마을
10 Allen PC 1988 Physiological basis for caroyenoid malabsorption during coccidiosis. Proc Maryland Nutr Conf 11:18-23
11 최병수, 김영일, 오세정 1988 산란계사료에 고춧가루 첨가가산란성. 난각질 및 난황착색도에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 15:281-286
12 Twining PV, Bossard EH, Lund PG, Thomas OP 1971 Relative availability of xanthophylls from ingredients basd on plasma levels and skin measurements. Proc Md Nutr Conf p. 90-95
13 Marusich WL, Baurenfeind JC 1981 Oxycarotenoids in poultry feeds. pp. 319-462. in Carotenoids as Colorants and Vitamin A Precurors. JC Baurenfeind, ed Academic Press, Inc New York NY
14 Spackman D 1987 The effect of disease on egg quality. In: Egg Quality-Current Problems and Recent Advances. pp. 252-282. RG Wells and CG Belyavin ed. Butterworths, Kent, England
15 Mazzuco H, Hester PY 2005 The effect of an induced molt and a second cycle of lay on skeletal integrity of White Leghorns. Poult Sci 84(5):771-781   DOI
16 Dua PN, Day EJ, Hill JE, Grogan CO 1967 Utilization of xanthophylls from natural sources by the chicks. J Agr Food Chem 15:324-328   DOI
17 Haugh RR 1937 The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Poult Mag 43:552-573
18 SAS 1999 SAS suer guide. release 6.11 edition. SAS Inst Inc Cary NC USA
19 허준무 1997 사료내 고추씨 첨가수준이 채란계 생산성과 난질에 미치는 영향. 건국대학교 축산자원생산학과 석사학위논문
20 Ahn DU, Sunwoo HH, Wolfe FH, Sim JS 1995 Effects of dietary alpha-linolenic acid and strain of hen on the fatty acid composition, storage stability, and flavor characteristics of chicken eggs. Poult Sci 74(9):1540-1547   DOI
21 황보종 홍의철 이병석 배해득 김원 노환국 김재황 김인호 2005b Aspergillus oryzae 접종 잔반사료가 산란계의 생산성과 계란의 품질에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 32(4):275-279   과학기술학회마을
22 Mazzuco H, McMurtry JP, Kuo AY, Hester PY 2005 The effect of pre- and postmolt diets high in n-3 fatty acids and molt programs on skeletal integrity and insuline-like growth factor-Iof White Leghorn. Poul Sci 84(11):1735-1749   DOI
23 김창혁, 송영환, 채병조, 이영철 2001 돈분-남은 음식물 혼합 extrusion 사료의 급여가 브로일러의 사양성적, 체조성 및 섭식행동에 미치는 영향. 한국동물자원과학회지 43:91-95
24 Day EJ, Williams WP Jr 1958 A study of certain factors that influence pigmentation in broilers. Poultry Sci 37:1373-1381   DOI
25 Dieckert JW, Kieckert MC, Creger CR 1988 Calcium reserve assembly: A basic structural unit of the calcium reserve system of the hen egg shell. Poult Sci 68:1569-1584
26 Duncan DB 1995 Multiple range and multiple F Tests Biometrics 11:1-42
27 Hurwitz S 1987 Effects of nutrition on egg quality. in: Egg Quality-Current Problems and Recent Advances. Eds RG Wells and CG Belyavin, Butterworths, Kent, England. pp. 234-254
28 Sauter EA, Stadelman WJ, Harns V, Mclaren BA 1951 Methods for measuring yolk index. Poultry Sci 30:629-630   DOI
29 AOAC 1995 Official Method of Analysis(16th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington DC USA
30 환경부 2001 남은 음식물의 효율적 처리방안
31 하정기 김태호 나재천 강보석 하광수 김동혁 이상진 2002 계란 농후난백의 높ㅇ리 측정부위에 따른 Albumen Index 와 Haugh Unit의 변화. 한국가금학회지 29(3):157-170
32 한인규 1989 사료자원 핸드북 pp. 253-254. 한국사료협회, 서울대학교 농과대학
33 Lipstein B 1985 The nutritional value of treated kitchen waste in layer diets. Nutr Rep Int 32:693-698