Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2020.20.6.555

Development of A Model for Diagnosing Management Capabilities of Public Facility  

Sung, Yookyung (Department of Engineering & Management, CERIK)
Yoo, Wi Sung (Department of Engineering & Management, CERIK)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction / v.20, no.6, 2020 , pp. 555-566 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, the aging of public facilities in Korea have accelerated, and the existing framework for facility management is shifting toward to facility asset management in terms of performance-based proactive control. Therefore, the operation of public facility involves both safety assurance from the deteriorated facilities and management capabilities for sustainable maintenance in the required valuation and level of service, such as valuation of facility assets, life-cycle management plans, financing, and so on. In this study, the Facility Asset Management Indicator(FAMI) has been developed for public facility asset management, and it provides the quantitative management grade, based on international standards, such as ISO 55000 series and International Infrastructure Management Manual(IIMM). The FMMI includes 10 key areas to apply a diagnosis model into management capabilities, 113 detailed elements, and 5 maturity grades. As the importance of public facility asset management is increasing constantly, this is expected to identify previously the strengths and weaknesses of public facility operating institutions. Eventually, they can obtain the effective ways to improve their own capabilities, minimize the public funds, establish the strategies for innovating the current management structures, and operate stably the facilities in the required performance.
Keywords
public facility management; facility asset management indicator; quantitative assessment; diagnosis model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia. International infrastructure management manual (Quick Guide). Version5.0. Australia: Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia; c2015. 33 p.
2 The Institute of Asset Management. The self-assessment methodology-Guidance. Version 1. UK: The Institute of Asset Management; 2014 Jun. 17 p.
3 The Institute of Asset Management. The IAM competences framework:The requirements. Version 3.0. UK: The Institute of Asset Management; 2014 Jun. 24 p.
4 Cho MY, Chae MJ, Oh EH, Lee G, Park JW, Yoo IG, Lee SH, Kim JW, Park KH, Sung JW, Hwang HG, Han SJ, Choi WS, Na HS. Korea total asset management -40. Korea: Korea Institute Of Construction Technology; 2012 June. 172 p. Report No.:KICT 2012-041-1
5 Do MS, Park SH, Kim JM, Choi SH, Lee YJ. Jung HY. Establishment of the road asset management system (Road pavement). Korea: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2016 Feb. 240p. Report No.: 11-161300 0-001139-01
6 Chae MJ, Park HJ, Lee G, Lee GH. Organizational reform for the successful implementation of infrastructure asset management using balanced score cards. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 2009 Nov;29(7D):745-52.
7 Kwon BS, Hong TH, Hyun CT, Chae MJ. Development of performance indicators for asset management in public facilities. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2010 Jul;11(4):89-99. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.4.89   DOI
8 Nam HJ, Lee YJ. A study on asset value evaluation process to develop AIS on social infrastructure. Information Systems Review. 2014 Dec;16(3):215-42. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2014.16.3.215   DOI
9 Kim CD, Lee HC. An improved facility management system for public facility management corporations. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2018 Jan; 19(1):32-42. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2018.19.1.032   DOI
10 Ha JW, Jung YS. Evaluation of CM capability based on business functions for international plant construction. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2014 Nov;15(6):3-15. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.6.003   DOI
11 Im JM, Kim SS. A case on application of the PMBOK(Project Management Body of Knowledge) guide in muclear power plant architect engineering. Construction Engineering and Management. 2012 Dec;13(6):41-5.
12 Project Management Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK®Guide). 6thed. USA: Project Management Institute; c2017. 756 p.
13 Global Forum on Maintenance & Asset Management. Asset management maturity a position statement. 1st ed. Switzerland; Global Forumon Maintenance &Asset Management; c2015. 11 p.
14 Choi JH, Son JH, Kim JH. Developing a project and program management capability assessment system for the korean construction management firms. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2015 Jan;16(1):3-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.1.003   DOI
15 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. The first basic plan for infrastructure management(2020-2025). Korea: MOLIT; 2020 May. 62 p.
16 Cho SO, Ko KJ, Hwang JH, Lee CS. Development of framework for asset management of public building. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection. 2015 Mar;19(2):133-42. https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2015.19.2.133   DOI
17 Chae MJ. Yoon WG. Introduction to infrastructure asset management. Seoul: Gumi Library; c2014. 226 p.
18 Park SH, Kwon TH, Kim JM, Lee SH. A framework for a domestic infrastructure asset management manual. Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea. 2016 Aug;29(4):327-34. https://doi.org/10.7734/coseik.2016.29.4.327   DOI
19 ISO. ISO 55000:2014 Asset management-Overview, principles and terminology. 1st ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2014 Jan. 19 p.
20 ISO. ISO 55001:2014 Asset management-management system-Requirement. 1st ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2014 Jan. 14 p.
21 ISO. ISO55002:2018 Asset management-management system-Guidelines on the application of ISO 55001. 2nd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2018Nov. 72 p.