Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2019.19.2.167

A Study on the Method for Judging the Required Protection Capacity through Decision Making  

Lee, Sung-Hak (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kangwon University)
Park, Sang-Woo (Korea Military Academy)
Baek, Jang-Woon (Korea Military Academy)
Park, Young-Jun (Korea Military Academy)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction / v.19, no.2, 2019 , pp. 167-174 More about this Journal
Abstract
Protective facilities are the last means of ensuring the survivability of personnel and assets, and there is a greater amount of matters to consider than those of general buildings. However, the Defense Military Facilities Criteria and the Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Ordinance No. 20, are only considering the expected enemy threats. In this study, we use objective and statistical methods to refine the consideration of the required capacity of protection based on the opinions of the experts. Specifically, the study adopts the Delphi technique associating the experts related to 30 defense military facilities criteria. The first-round questions were open-ended, and it compiled the points to consider related to the bulletproof and explosion - proof design. The second questionnaire was applied as closed questionnaire with 7 points scale methods. As a result of the factor analysis on the opinions of the experts, it was confirmed that the protection requirement level was due to METT + TC.
Keywords
required capacity of protection; delphi technique; factor analysis; METT+TC;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Defense Installations Agency. Department Military Facilities Criteria 2-20-10. Design Criteria for explosion-proof and bullet-proof facilities. 2014.
2 Ministry of the Interior and Safety. Ordinance No. 20. Regulations on the Establishment of Emergency Evacuation Facilities of Government Offices. 2017.
3 Lee JC, Park YJ, Kim KS, Lim TS, Park YK. A basic study on upgrading of the evaluation factors of the protective capacity in military protective facilities. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2006 Jan;22(1):31-8.
4 Park BH. A study on protective criteria and explosion safety evaluation of shelter against external explosion [dissertation]. [Gumi (Korea)]: Kum-oh National University of Technology; 2007. p. 62-78.
5 Cruz AM, Okada N. Consideration of natural hazards in the design and risk management of industrial facilities. Natural hazards. 2008 Feb;44(2):213-27.   DOI
6 Bahr NJ. System safety engineering and risk assessment: a practical approach. 2nd ed. USA, Boca Raton;CRC Press; 2014. 272 p.
7 Marshall HE, Chapman RE, Leng CJ. Risk mitigation plan for optimizing protection of constructed facilities. Cost engineering. 2004;46(8):26-33.
8 FEMA. Risk Assessment; A how-to guide to mitigate potential terrorist attacks against buildings. Washington: DC;FEMA; 2005. 248 p.
9 O'connor BP. SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. 2000 Sep;32(3):396-402.   DOI
10 Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2007 May;31(3):245-8.   DOI
11 Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1966 Apr;1(2):245-76.   DOI
12 Kaiser HF. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1958 Sep;23(3):187-200.   DOI