Browse > Article

Comparison of Position-Rotation Models and Orbit-Attitude Models with SPOT images  

Kim Tae-Jung (인하대학교 지리정보공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography / v.24, no.1, 2006 , pp. 47-55 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper investigates the performance of sensor models based on satellite position and rotation angles and sensor models based on satellite orbit and attitude angles. We analyze the performance with respect to the accuracy of bundle adjustment and the accuracy of exterior orientation estimation. In particular, as one way to analyze the latter, we establish sensor models with respect to one image and apply the models to other scenes that have been acquired from the same orbit. Experiment results indicated that fer the sole purpose of bundle adjustment accuracy one could use both position-rotation models and orbit-attitude models. The accuracy of estimating exterior orientation parameters appeared similar for both models when analysis was performed based on single scene. However, when multiple scenes within the same orbital segment were used for analysis, the orbit-attitude model with attitude biases as unknowns showed the most accurate results.
Keywords
Sensor model; Bundle adjustment; Orbit Model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
1 김태정 (2005), 선형 푸시브룸 센서모델의 번들조정 정확도 및 외부표정요소추정 정확도 분석, 한국측량학회지, 제23권, 제2호, pp. 137-145   과학기술학회마을
2 Gugan, D. J. and Dowman, I. J. (1988), Accuracy and Completeness of Topographic Mapping from SPOT Imagery, Photogrammetric Record, 12(72):787-796   DOI
3 Orun, A. B. and K. Natarajan (1994), A modified bundle adjustment software for SPOT imagery and photography: Tradeoff, PE&RS, 60(12):1431-1437
4 ASPRS, 2004, Manual of Photogrammetry (5th Edition), J.C. McGlone (Editor)
5 김태정, 김승범, 신동석 (2000), 대표적 위성영상 카메라 모델링 알고리즘들의 비교연구, 대한원격탐사학회지, 제16권, 제1호, pp. 73-86
6 McGlone, C. (1996), Sensor Modeling in Image Registration, In Digital Photogrammetry-An Addendum to the Manual of Photogrammetry, edited by Greve, C, ASPRS, pp. 115-123
7 Radhadevi, P.V., Ramachandran, R. and Mohan, M. (1998), Restitution of IRS-1C PAN data using an orbit attitude model and minimum control, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53(1998):262-271   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Gupta, R. and Hartley, R. (1997), Linear Pushbroom Cameras, IEEE Trans. PAMI, 19(9):963-975   DOI   ScienceOn
9 SPOT Image (2002), SPOT Satellite Geomtry Handbook, S- NT-73-12-SI
10 Konecny, G., Lohmann, P., Engel, H. and Kruck, E. (1987), Evaluation of SPOT imagery on analytical photogrammetric instruments, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53(9):1223-1230
11 Dial, G. and Grodecki, J. (2002), Block Adjustment with Rational Polynomial Camera Models, Proc. of ACSM-ASPRS 2002 Annual Conference