Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2020.43.3.167

Investigation and evaluation of appearance ratio using wildbird intrusion prevention device in domestic fowl farms  

Kim, YoungSik (Department of Veterinary Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University)
Kim, Yunji (Department of Veterinary Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University)
Na, Eun-Jee (Department of Veterinary Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University)
Lee, Sook-Young (Department of Veterinary Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University)
Oem, Jae-Ku (Department of Veterinary Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service / v.43, no.3, 2020 , pp. 167-171 More about this Journal
Abstract
The epidemiological investigation of outbreak in korea confirmed that the inflow of avian influenza (AI) is related to the migration of migratory birds. In this study, avian repellents instrument were implemented and developed using the visual effects of lasers in accordance with the situation of small domestic fowl farms, and monitoring cameras were installed around each instrument to investigate the frequency of wild birds appearing and evaluate the performance of the instrument. Observation showed that the appreance ratio was reduced by 95%, and no significant reduction in the intrusion prevention effect by adaptation was observed on all fowl farms. In conclusion, it is expected that the outbreak of wild bird-borne infectious diseases such as avian influenza will be decreased if the device is installed on domestic fowl farms.
Keywords
Avian repellent system; Laser; Domestic fowl farm; Avian influenza;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 한국농림시스템. 2014. 레이저 조류퇴치기 2종 개발. 중소기업청.
2 환경부. 2020. 야생생물 보호 및 관리에 관한 법률 제 14조.
3 Bishop J, McKay H, Parrott D, Allan J. 2003. Review of international research literature regarding the effectiveness of auditory bird scaring techniques and potential alternatives. Food and Rural Affairs.
4 Blackwell B, Bernhardt G, Dolbeer R. 2002. Lasers as nonlethal avian repellents. J Wildl Manage. 66: 250-258.   DOI
5 Booth T. 2016. Bird Dispersal Techniques. The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage E19-24.
6 Clark L. 1998. Review of Bird Repellents. vertebrate pest conference.
7 Gilsdorf J, Hygnstrom S, VerCauteren K. 2002. Use of frightening devices in wildlife damage management. Integrated Pest Manag Rev. 7: 29-45.   DOI
8 Gorenzel W, Salmon T. 2008. Bird Hazing Manual. pp. 9-10. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources.
9 Hall M, Heesy C. 2011. Eye size, flight speed and Leuckart's Law in birds. J Zool 283: 291-297.   DOI
10 Howland H, Merola S, Basarab, J. 2004. The allometry and scaling of the size of vertebrate eyes. Vision Res. 44: 2043-2065.   DOI
11 농림축산검역본부. 2016. 2014-2016 고병원성조류인플루엔자 역학조사분석보고서.
12 Rivadeneira P, Kross S, Navarro-Gonzalez N, Jay-Russel M. 2018. A Review of Bird Deterrents Used in Agriculture. vertebrate pest conference.
13 이강준, 김용석, 한훈희, 신대원. 2008. 항공기 조류 충돌 방지방안 연구. 교통안전공단.