Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2020.43.3.147

Development and evaluation of standard samples for quality control of automated total bacterial counter in raw milk  

Kang, Hye Jeong (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Kim, Jin Hwan (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Byun, Yeong Seob (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Lee, Hana (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Lee, Hye Young (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Kim, Jihyeon (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Hong, Serim (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Kim, Ha-Young (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Yoon, Soon-Seek (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Moon, Jin-San (Bacterial Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service / v.43, no.3, 2020 , pp. 147-154 More about this Journal
Abstract
Standard samples were prepared for this study, and applied for BactoScanTM and BactoCountTM in order for quality control evaluation for total bacterial count in raw milk. Accordingly, the preparation of two lots of standard samples for quality control were lyophilized, which contain Lactobacillus lactis. The standard samples were prepared into three different levels of bacterial counts, those were Low 30,000~40,000, Medium 70,000~90,000, High 150,000~220,000 CFU/mL, respectively. Then, the proficiency tests were performed in total 19 laboratories for measuring total bacterial counts. The total bacterial counts in the standard samples showed 37~42, 82~105, 214~240 CFU/mL in the first lot, and it showed 30~36, 67~75, 131~163 CFU/mL in the second lot in low, medium and high levels, respectively. Based on these results, the absolute values of z-scores of six standard samples in 18 laboratories were ≤2, which means the samples are satisfactory. However, z-score in one laboratory was ≤3, which means the sample is questionable. Using two standard samples, the correlation between BactoScanTM and BactoCountTM was 0.9982, which means the results of total bacterial count measurement of both equipment were equivalent. Therefore, the standard samples manufactured in this study for quality control of total bacterial count using BactoScanTM and BactoCountTM in the raw milk could be applied to proficiency tests.
Keywords
Proficiency test; Quality control; Raw milk; Standard sample; Total bacterial count;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bolzoni G, Marcolini A, Fontana A, Monaco L, Ferrini AM. 2017. BactoScan FC: conversion system for results at the national level in Italy and reproducibility of total bacterial counting four years after implementation. Euroreference. 2: 46-54.
2 Boucher SN, Slater ER, Chamberlain AH, Adams MR. 1994. Production and viablity of coccoid forms of Campylobacter jejuni. J Appl Bacteriol. 77: 303-307.   DOI
3 Bulletin of the IDF. 1998. Milk payment systems for ex-farm milk. No 3331/1998.
4 Desmeasures NM, Gueguen M. 1997. Monitoring the microbiology of high quality milk by monthly sampling over 2 years. J Dairy Res. 64:271-280. doi:10.1017/s0022029996002130.   DOI
5 Gunasekera TS, Attfield PV, Veal DA. 2000. A flow cytometry method for rapid detection and enumeration of total bacterial bacteria in milk. App Env Microbiol. 66: 1228-1232. doi:10.11128/aem.66.3.1228-1232.2000.   DOI
6 ISO 4833-1:2013. Microbiology of the food chain Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms Part 1: Colony count at 30 degrees C by the pour plate technique. pp 9. www.iso.org.
7 Kim JY, Seo EY, Kim MR, Jeon NH, Chung HM, Kim MW, Ahn TS. 2008. Production of standard sample for quality control of total coliform. The Korean Journal of Microbiology. 44: 43-48.
8 Madden RH, Gordon A, Corcionivoschi N. 2017. Determination of the BactoScan conversion Factor for the United Kingdom. Dairy microbiology. 70: 15-17.
9 REGULATION (EC) No 853/2004 of THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for the hygiene of foodstuffs.
10 농림축산식품부. 2016. 원유검사 공영화 실시요령. 농림축산식품부 고시 제2016-146호.
11 농림축산식품부 & 낙농진흥회. 2016. 낙농통계연감. pp. 261.
12 Rollins DM, Colwel RR. 1986. Viable but nonculturable stage of Campylobacter jejuni. and its role in survival in the natural aquatic environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 52: 531-538.   DOI
13 Suhren G, Walte HG. 2000 First experiences with automatic flow cytometric determination of total bacterial count in raw milk. Int Dairy Fed Bull. 50: 249-275.
14 Walter S, Thomas B. 2016. Application of a unified European conversion factor for the transformation of Bactoscan FC values. Food Agroscope Science. 36: 1-11.
15 국립환경과학원. 2004. 공정시험법 세균항목의 정도관리 방안. pp. 49.
16 농림축산검역본부. 2019. 원유검사 표준화 운영 실무 가이드라인. pp. 43-52.