Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2018.41.4.251

Comparison of local reaction at injection site following intramuscular administration with three commercial atrophic rhinitis vaccines in pigs  

Kim, Myung-Hyee (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University)
Kwon, Taeyong (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University)
Yoo, Sung J. (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University)
Seo, Sang won (Hipra Korea Inc.)
Park, Jun Woo (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University)
Lyoo, Young S. (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service / v.41, no.4, 2018 , pp. 251-255 More about this Journal
Abstract
Bordetella bronchiseptica and Pasteurella multocida are two main pathogens responsible for atrophic rhinitis (AR), which causes considerable economic losses in swine industry worldwide. Commercial vaccine has been widely used to prevent the damage from AR in Korea. Adverse effects of vaccination at the injection site have been reported, which results in the numerous complaint from farms. However, data on about local reaction at the injection site remains limited. In this study, we compared the local adverse effects of three commercial vaccines following intramuscular injection. The results showed that no gross lesion was founded at the injection sites of all three vaccines. In histopathologic examination, a various level of lesions was identified. Especially, the local reaction of vaccine including saponin as an adjuvant showed the lowest level of histopathological lesions, when compared to those of oil-based and vitamin E-based vaccines. Therefore, this study would provide the information about the extent of local reaction at the injection site and help the farmer to select AR vaccine in order to avoid adverse reaction due to vaccination.
Keywords
Atrophic rhinitis; Vaccine; Local reaction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ackermann MR, Rimler RB, Thurston JR. 1991. Experimental model of atrophic rhinitis in gnotobiotic pigs. Infect Immun 59: 3626-3629.
2 Brockmeier SL, Register KB, Magyar T, Lax AJ, Pullinger GD, Kunkle RA. 2002. Role of the dermonecrotic toxin of Bordetella bronchiseptica in the pathogenesis of respiratory disease in swine. Infect Immun 70: 481-490.   DOI
3 Burakova Y, Madera R, McVey S, Schlup JR, Shi J. 2018. Adjuvants for animal vaccines. Viral Immunol 31: 11-22.   DOI
4 Cox JC, Coulter AR. 1997. Adjuvants-a classification and review of their modes of action. Vaccine 15: 248-256.   DOI
5 Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F, Chiers K, Maes D, Ducatelle R, Decostere A. 2004. Efficacy of vaccines against bacterial diseases in swine: what can we expect? Vet Microbiol 100: 255-268.   DOI
6 Lee S, Nguyen MT. 2015. Recent advances of vaccine adjuvants for infectious diseases. Immune Netw 15: 51-57.   DOI
7 Lyons NA, Lyoo YS, King DP, Paton DJ. 2016. Challenges of generating and maintaining protective vaccine-induced immune responses for foot-and-mouth disease virus in pigs. Front Vet Sci 3: 102.
8 Opriessnig T, Gimenez-Lirola LG, Halbur PG. 2011. Polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs. Anim Health Res Rev 12: 133-148.   DOI
9 Park YR, Lim DR, Kim HR, Park MJ, Kim B, Kim WI, Hong CH, Kim SN, Park, CK. 2017. Evaluation of efficacy of a commercial vaccine stress-relieving agent to reduce the adverse effects of foot-and-mouth disease vaccination site in pig. Korean J Vet Serv 40: 177-185.
10 Pedersen KB, Elling F. 1984. The pathogenesis of atrophic rhinitis in pigs induced by toxigenic Pasteurella multocida. J Comp Pathol 94: 203-214.   DOI
11 Petrovsky N. 2015. Comparative safety of vaccine adjuvants: A summary of current evidence and future needs. Drug Saf 38: 1059-1074.   DOI
12 Roth JA. 1999. Mechanistic bases for adverse vaccine reactions and vaccine failures. Adv Vet Med 41: 681-700.
13 Lee WH, Yoo HS. 2015. Suggested guidelines for vaccination of pigs in Korea. Clin Exp Vaccine Res 4: 119-120.   DOI