Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2013.36.3.157

Effects of ozone, ultraviolet and an organic acid-based disinfectant against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus  

Yoon, Yong-Dae (PIC Korea)
Kim, Won-Il (College of Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Diagnostic Center, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service / v.36, no.3, 2013 , pp. 157-162 More about this Journal
Abstract
A good level of biosecurity practice is important for efficient porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) control. In the current study, disinfecting ability of ozone against PRRS virus (PRRSV) was evaluated in comparison with ultraviolet (UV) and an organic acid-based disinfectant to assess the possible use of ozone for disinfecting farm vehicles, equipments, and materials to reduce the risk of new virus introduction. For in vitro evaluation, the levels of infectious virus and viral RNA were determined on the swabs collected from the floor surface of each room treated with either ozone, UV or the disinfectant up to 30 min after contamination with 100 mL of VR2332 ($10^5\;TCID_{50}/mL$). For in vivo evaluation, 3, 4-week old, PRRS-free pigs were housed into those rooms right after the last swab collection. Then the pigs in each room were injected intramuscularly with the corresponding swab samples collected at the last time point and pooled per each room. Although ozone, UV, and the disinfectant significantly reduced the levels of PRRSV RNA contamination, ozone was most effective in removing the viral RNA. In addition, the virus collected after at least 10 min exposure to ozone failed to replicate in pigs while the virus collected after treatment with UV and the disinfectant for 30 min still replicated in pigs. Based on the results, it was concluded that ozone is more effective in inactivating PRRSV as compared with UV and the organic acid-based disinfectant.
Keywords
PRRS; Ozone; Ultraviolet; Organic acid-based disinfectant; Disinfectant efficiency;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Soltani MK, Asgary S. 2013. A review of the properties and applications of ozone in endodontics: an update. Iran Endod J 8: 40-43.
2 Neumann EJ, Kliebenstein JB, Johnson CD, Mabry JW, Bush EJ, Seitzinger AH, Green AL, Zimmerman JJ. 2005. Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome on swine production in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1: 385-392.
3 Nieuwenhuis N, Duinhof TF, van Nes A. 2012. Economic analysis of outbreaks of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in nine sow herds. Vet Rec 3: 225.
4 Otake S, Dee SA, Rossow KD, Joo HS, Deen J, Molitor TW, Pijoan C. 2002. Transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by needles.Vet Rec 26: 114-115.
5 Pejsak Z, Stadejek T, Markowska-Daniel I. 1997. Clinical signs and economic losses caused by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in a large breeding farm. Vet Microbiol 55: 317-322.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Sato H, Wananabe Y, Miyata H. 1990. Virucidal effect of ozone treatment of laboratory animal viruses. Jikken Dobutsu 39: 223-229.
7 Shirai J, Kanno T, Tsuchiya Y, Mitsubayashi S, Seki R. 2000. Effects of chlorine, iodine, and quaternary ammonium compound disinfectants on several exotic disease viruses. J Vet Med Sci 62: 85-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Swenson SL, Hill HT, Zimmerman JJ, Evans LE, Landgraf JG, Wills RW, Sanderson TP, McGinley MJ, Brevik AK, Ciszewski DK. 1994. Excretion of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in semen after experimentally induced infection in boars. J Am Vet Med Assoc 15: 1943-1948.
9 Alonso C, Davies PR, Polson DD, Dee SA, Lazarus WF. 2013. Financial implications of installing air filtration systems to prevent PRRSV infection in large sow herds. Prev Vet Med 1: 268-277.
10 Bocci VA. 2006. Scientific and medical aspects of ozone therapy. State of the art. Arch Med Res 37: 425-435.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Christopher-Hennings J, Nelson EA, Hines RJ, Nelson JK, Swenson SL, Zimmerman JJ, Chase CL, Yaeger MJ, Benfield DA. 1995. Persistence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in serum and semen of adult boars. J Vet Diagn Invest 7: 456-464.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Cutler TD, Wang C, Hoff SJ, Zimmerman JJ. 2012. Effect of temperature and relative humidity on ultraviolet (UV 254) inactivation of airborne porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus. Vet Microbiol 14: 47-52.
13 Kim HS, Kwang J, Yoon IJ, Joo HS, Frey ML. 1993. Enhanced replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus in a homogeneous subpopulation of MA-104 cell line. Arch Virol 133: 477-483.   DOI
14 Dee SA, Deen J, Burns D, Douthit G, Pijoan C. 2004. An assessment of sanitation protocols for commercial transport vehicles contaminated with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Can J Vet Res 68: 208-214.
15 Dee SA, Joo H. 1997. Strategies to control PRRS: a summary of field and research experiences. Vet Microbiol 55: 347-353.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Dee SA, Otake S, Deen J. 2011. An evaluation of ultraviolet light (UV254) as a means to inactivate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on common farm surfaces and materials. Vet Microbiol 12: 96-99.
17 Kim WI, Lee DS, Johnson W, Roof M, Cha SH, Yoon KJ, 2007. Effect of genotypic and biotypic differences among PRRS viruses on the serologic assessment of pigs for virus infection. Vet Microbiol 123: 1-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Macauley JJ, Qiang Z, Adams CD, Surampalli R, Mormile MR. 2006. Disinfection of swine wastewater using chlorine, ultraviolet light and ozone. Water Res 40: 2017-2026.   DOI   ScienceOn