Browse > Article

A survey of chicken coccidiosis according to anti-coccidiosis drugs treatment in slaughtered chickens  

Heo Jung-Ho (Gyeongnam Livestock Promotion Institute South-branch)
Jung Myung-Ho (Gyeongnam Livestock Promotion Institute South-branch)
Kim Kuk-Hun (Gyeongnam Livestock Promotion Institute South-branch)
Cho Myung-Heui (Gyeongnam Livestock Promotion Institute South-branch)
Lee Kuk-Cheon (Gyeongnam Livestock Promotion Institute South-branch)
Seo Jong-Lip (Gyeongnam Goseung City Livestock Office)
Kim Chung-Hui (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Jinju National University)
Hah Dae-Sik (Gyeongnam Provincial Government Institute of Health and Environment)
Ryu Jae-Doo (National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service Busan Regional Office)
Kim Gon-Sup (College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University(Inst. Of Animal Science))
Kim Eui-Gyung (College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University(Inst. Of Animal Science))
Kim Jong-Shu (College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University(Inst. Of Animal Science))
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Service / v.28, no.3, 2005 , pp. 275-284 More about this Journal
Abstract
The present study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of Eimeria infection according to anti-coccidiosis drugs treatment in 1,300 slaughtered chickens from 130 farms in Gyeongnam, Jeonnam, Jeonbuk, Gyeongbuk and Chungnam during the period from October 2002 to August 2003. The prevalence of Eimeria infection by drug administration for treatment and prevention or non-administration was shown $71.4\%,\;82.6\%\;and\;72.3\%$, respectively, and so infection rate of chicken farms was similar independent on drug administration or not. The prevalence of Oocysts infection level of chicken farms by administrated drug for treatment was shown lower $(25.3\%)$ than for prevention $(35.4\%)$ and non-treatment $(36.2\%)$. The prevalence of Oocysts infection level by drug administration under 2 days for treatment was shown higher infection rate $(32.2\%)$ than over 3 days $(20\%)$ and also under 2 days for prevention has similar tendency of that of treatment and so, it was conclusion that administration of drug over 3 days has the effect for treatment and prevention of Eimeria infection. The prevalence of Oocysts infection level by age for prevention has various level from $48.8\%\;to\;22.9\%$ but on $22\~25$ days was shown the most higher ratio $(48.8\%)$ and on $19\~21$ days was shown the lowest rate $(22.9\%)$ among the all age groups.
Keywords
Eimeria; Oocysts; Anti-Coccidiosis drugs;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Long PL. 1982. The biology of Coccidia. Baltimore: University Park Press : 375-414
2 유종철. 2000. 양계질병과 사양관리 분석. 인터베트 코리아(주), 서울 : 119-123
3 장두환. 1972. 가축과 가금의 콕시디아 조사. 대한수의학회지 12 : 185-189
4 김병기, 장두환. 1985. 국내 육계 농장의 콕시디아 오오시스트 오염 실태에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 수의대 논문집 : 155-167
5 허정호,정명호, 김국헌, 김종수 등. 2004. 도계장 출하닭에 대한 구포자충 감염 실태 조사. 임상 수의학회지 21: 161-167
6 김우영. 1993. 양계 경영과 사육. 2판. 오성출판사, 서울 : 253-271
7 윤희정, 홍기옥, 양창근. 1996. 국내 시판용 항콕시듐제제의 약제효능 재평가. I. 치료제용 항콕시듐제제. 서울대학교 수의대논문집 21 : 1-8
8 최상호, 윤희정, 이우용 등. 1987. 닭 항콕시듐제 내성에 관한 연구. 가축위생연구소 시험사업보고서 : 196-209
9 최상호, 김기석, 김용희. 1984. 국내 육계의 Coccidia 감염에 관한 역학적 조사 연구. 농촌진흥연구소 시험연구 사업 보고서 26 : 44-52
10 이재구. 1987. 최신 수의 기생충학. 1 판. 대한교과서주식회사 : 427-473
11 Lyens VR, Mark DL, Levine ND. 1981. Principal parasites of domestic animals in the U.S. Urbana Campaign : Illinois State University Press : 72-114
12 김기석, 윤희정, 최상호. 1985. 닭콕시듐 방제에 관한 연구. 가축위생연구소 시험사업보고서 : 248-258
13 Sloss MW, Russel L, Kemp AB. 1983. Veterinary clinical parasitology. Vet Rec 5 : 109-119
14 수의과학검역원. 1997. 국내 닭 콕시듐 원충의 양계장 오염실태 및 항콕시듐 약제감수성 조사. 안양가축위생연구소 연구보고서 : 358-362
15 최상호, 이원창. 1983. 국내 육계의 Coccidia 감염에 관한 역학적 조사 연구. 한국수의공중보건학회지 7 : 141-152
16 윤희정, 노재욱. 1998. 국내시판용 항콕시듐제제의 약제효능 재평가. 한국수의공중보건학회지 22 : 131-137
17 Bains BS. 1989. A guide of poultry disease. Swiss : Hoffman-La-Roche and Co : 171-175
18 양홍지, 윤여백, 박태욱 등. 1993. 전북지방 닭의 기생충 감염상황. 한가위지 16 : 82-89
19 Conway DP. 1979. Poultry Coccidia diagnostic and testing procedures. International Inc. New York. Pfizer : 31-33
20 양홍지. 1998. 가축기생충도감. 1판. 도서출판 샤론 : 132-214
21 김윤태, 고원석, 이정원 등. 2000. 육계에서 콕시듐증, 가금티푸스 및 전염성 F낭병 혼합감염 발생 예. 전북 축산진흥연구소 생명공학 및 가축위생 시험연구논문집 : 147-150
22 최원필, 송희종, 김순재. 1994. 수의전염병학. 경북대학교출판부 : 515-520
23 이병도, 문주상. 1959. 닭 콕시듐의 지역적 분포. 가축위생연구소 연구보고서 6 : 33-39