Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13160/ricns.2011.4.2.099

A Review about the Importance of Protonation of Ionizable Molecules on the Predictability of CoMFA  

Kothandan, Gugan (Centre for Bioinformatics, Department of Biochemistry, School of Life sciences, University of Madras)
Publication Information
Journal of Integrative Natural Science / v.4, no.2, 2011 , pp. 99-102 More about this Journal
Abstract
Effect of protonation and deprotonation of ionization compounds is an important application in Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). There are enough information's were reported about different CoMFA applications such as Series design and selection of training set, Geometries and optimizations of molecules, Effect of partial atomic charges, bioactive conformations and alignment, Interaction energy fields, Effects of different grid spacing etc. However limited information's are available about the ionization of compounds. This study aimed at the critical review of about the effects of protonation of ionizable molecules and its impact on the predictability of CoMFA models. We also discussed about previous implications and the things needed to be considered to come for a final conclusion about its impact on CoMFA predictability.
Keywords
3D QSAR; CoMFA; Protonation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 S. A Roberts, "High-throughput screening approaches for investigating drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics", Xenobiotica., Vol. 31, pp. 557-589, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 M. Dias, R. Mittal, R. McKinnon and M. Sorich, "Systematic statistical comparison of comparative molecular similarity indices analysis molecular fields for computer-aided lead optimization", J. Chem Inf. Model., Vol. 46, pp. 2015-2021, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 R. D. Cramer, D. E. Patterson and J. D. Bunce, "Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) I. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins", J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 110, pp. 5959-5967, 1988.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 G. Klebe, U. Abraham and T. Mietzner, "Molecular Similarity Indices in a Comparative Analysis (CoMSIA) of Drug Molecules to Correlate and Predict Their Biological Activity", J. Med. Chem., Vol. 37, pp. 4130-4146, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 L. L. Zhu, T. J. Hou, L. R. Chen and X. J. Xu, "3D QSAR Analyses of Novel Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Based on Pharmacophore Alignment", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., Vol. 41, pp. 1032-1040, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 G. Klebe, "Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis: CoMSIA", Perspect. Drug Discovery Des., Vol. 12, pp. 87-104, 1998.
7 K. H. Kim, "Comparative Molecular Similarity Field Analysis (CoMFA), In dean, P. M. (Ed.) Molecular similarity in drug design", Blackie Academic & Professional, London., pp. 291-331, 1995.
8 L. Belvisi, G. Bravi, G. Catalano, M. Mabilia, A. Salimbeni and C. Scolastico, "A 3D QSAR CoMFA study of non-peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists", J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., Vol. 10, pp. 567-582, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 K. H. Kim, G. Greco and E. Novellino, "A critical review of recent CoMFA applications", Perspect. Drug Discovery Des., Vol. 12, pp. 257-315, 1998.
10 R. T. Kroemer, P. Hecht and K. R. Liedl, "Different electrostatic descriptors in comparative molecular field analysis: A comparison of molecular electrostatic and Coulomb potentials", J. Comput. Chem., Vol. 17, pp. 1296-1308, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 A. Shagufta, G. Kumar, M. Panda, I. Siddiqi, "CoMFA and CoMSIA 3D-QSAR analysis of diaryloxy-methano-phenanthrene derivatives as antitubercular agents", J. Mol. Model., Vol. 13, pp. 99-109, 2007.
12 Y. L. Li, A. D. Mackerell, M. J. Egorin, M. F. Ballesteros, D. M. Rosen, Y. Y. Wu, D. A. Blamble and P. S. Callery, "Comparative molecular field analysis-based predictive model of structure function relationships of polyamine transport inhibitors in L1210", Cancer. Res., Vol. 57, pp. 234-239, 1997.
13 H. Gohlke, S. Schwarz, D. Gundisch, M. C. Tilotta, A. Weber, T. Wegge, and G. Seitz, "3D QSAR Analyses-Guided Rational Design of Novel Ligands for the ($\alpha$4)2($\beta$2)3 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor", J. Med. Chem., Vol. 46, pp. 2031-2048, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 W. Tong, E. R. Collantes, Y. Chen and W. J. Welsh, "A comparative molecular field analysis study of N-benzylpiperidines as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors", J. Med. Chem., Vol. 39, pp. 380-387, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 T. I. Opera, C. L. Waller and G. R. Marshall, "3D-QSAR of human immunodeficiency virus (I) protease inhibitors: 3. Interpretation of CoMFA results", Drug Des. Discovery., Vol. 12, pp. 29-51, 1994.
16 C. L. Waller, T. I. Opera, A. Giolitti and G. R. Marshall, "Three-dimensional QSAR of human immunodeficiency virus-I protease inhibitors: 1. A CoMFA study employing experimentally determined alignment rules", J. Med. Chem., Vol. 36, pp. 4152-4160, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 R. R. Mittal. R. A. McKinnon and M. J. Sorich, "Effect of steric molecular field settings on CoMFA predictivity", J. Mol. Model., Vol. 14, pp. 59-67, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 R. R. Mittal, L. Harris, R. A. McKinnon and M. J. Sorich, "Partial Charge Calculation Method Affects CoMFA QSAR Prediction Accuracy", J. Chem. Inf. Model., Vol. 49, pp. 704-709, 2009.   DOI   ScienceOn