Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2012.14.3.212

A Coorientation Analysis of Perception on Bionursing between Clinical Nurses and Nursing Professors  

Choe, Myoung-Ae (Seoul National University College of Nursing)
An, Gyeong-Ju (Department of Nursing, Cheongju University)
Jeong, Jae-Sim (Department of Clinical Nursing, University of Ulsan)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science / v.14, no.3, 2012 , pp. 212-220 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare perception on bionursing and satisfaction and importance about bionursing subjects of clinical nurses with that of professors using a coorientation model. Methods: Subjects for this study consisted of 135 clinical nurses at a tertiary hospital and 114 nursing professors. Questionnaire for perception on bionursing consisted of competency of professor, linkage with clinical practice and research of bionursing. Perceptions on bionursing education and research, satisfaction and importance about subjects of bionursing were measured. The data were analyzed by t-test. Results: Perception of clinical nurses on research of bionursing was more positive than professors. Perception of professors on research of bionursing was significantly less than that of professors estimated by clinical nurses. Perception of clinical nurses on linkage with clinical practice and research of bionursing estimated by nursing professor was significantly less than that of clinical nurses. Satisfaction of clinical nurses with the subjects of bionursing was significantly less than that of professors. Clinical nurses perceived anatomy the most important while professors perceived physiology the most important. Conclusion: Perceptions of clinical nurses on bionursing as well as satisfaction and importance about subjects of bionursing were identified to be different from those of professors.
Keywords
Coorientation; Bionursing; Perception; Nurses; Professor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Clancy, J., McVicar, A., & Bird, D. (2000). Getting it right? An exploration of issues relating to the biological sciences in nurse education and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1522-1532.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Courtenay, M. (1991). A study of the teaching and learning of the biological sciences in nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16, 1110-1116.   DOI
3 Danielson, E., & Berntsson, L. (2007). Registered nurses' perceptions of educational preparation for professional work and development in their profession. Nurse Education Today, 27, 900-908.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Davies, S., Murphy, F., & Jordan, S. (2000). Bioscience in the preregistration curriculum: Finding the right teaching strategy. Nurse Education Today, 20, 123-135.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Davis, G. M. (2010). What is provided and what the registered nurse needs Bioscience learning through the preregistration curriculum. Nurse Education Today, 30, 707-712.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Friedel, J. M., & Treagust, D. F. (2005). Learning bioscience in nursing education: Perceptions of the intended and the prescribed curriculum. Learning in Health & Social Care, 4, 203-216.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Hwang, A. R. (1998, December). Current status of the curriculum operation of biological nursing subjects-Yonsei University College of Nursing. Paper presented at the meeting of the Korean Biological Nursing Science, Seoul, Korea.
8 Jervis, L. M. (1996). Nursing education in universitiesa perspective from biological sciences. Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 49-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kang, D. H. (2003). Psychoneuroimmunology in nursing research: A biobehavioral model. Research in Nursing & Health, 26, 421-423.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kyriacos, U., Jordan, S., & Heever, J. (2005). The biological sciences in nursing: A developing country perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, 91-103.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Larcombe, J., & Dick, J. (2003). Who is best qualified to teach bioscience to nurses? Nursing Standard, 17(51), 38-44.   DOI
12 Lee, K. E., Park, Y. R., Cho, K. J., & Park, M. J. (2011). Research trends in the Korean biological nursing scienceBased on analysis of the research papers published in the journal of Korean biological nursing science from 1999 to 2010. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 13(2), 81-93.
13 McVicar, A., & Clancy, J. (2001). The biosciences and fitness for practice: A time for review? British Journal of Nursing, 10, 1415-1420.   DOI
14 Meehan-Andrews, T. A. (2009). Teaching mode eficiency and learning preferences of first year nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 29, 24-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Mooney, M. (2007). Facing registration: The expectation and the unexpectated. Nurse Education Today, 27, 840-847.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Page, G, G. (2004). The importance of animal research to nursing science. Nursing Outlook, 52, 102-107.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Rudy, E., & Grady, P. (2005). Biological researchers: Building nursing science. Nursing Outlook, 53, 88-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Seo, W. S., & Lee, Y. W. (1999). A analysis of requisite knowledge body of physiology for clinical nursing practices. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 29, 711-720.   DOI
19 Tkaes, N. C., & Thompson, H. J. (2006). From bedside to bench and back again: Research issues in animal models of human disease. Biological Research for Nursing, 8, 78-88.   DOI
20 Avery, E., Lariscy, R., & Sweetser, K. D. (2010). Social media and sharedor divergentuses? A coorientation analysis of public relations practitioners and journalists. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 189-205.   DOI
21 Casey, G. (1996). Analysis of Akinsanya's model of bionursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 1065-1070.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Choe, M. A., & Shin, G. S. (1997). A study on the current status of the curriculum operation of the basic medical sciences in nursing education. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 27, 975-987.
23 Choe, M. A., & Shin, G. S. (1999). Objectives and contents of basic medical sciences in nursing education. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 29, 1455-1468.   DOI
24 Choe, M. A., Byeon, Y. S., Seo, Y. S., Hwang, A. R., Kim, H. S., Hong, H. S., et al. (1999). A study on the degree of need of human structure and function knowledge in clinical nurses. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 1, 1-24.
25 Choe, M. A., Byun, Y. S., Seo, Y. S., Hwang, A. R., Kim, H. S., Hong, H. S., et al. (2000). A study on the degree of need of the knowledge of pathophysiology, clinical microbiology and mechanism and effects of drugs in clinical nurses. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing, 2(1), 1-19.
26 Yoo, J. S., Ahn, J. A., Yeo, K. S., & Chu, S. H. (2008). The study to reorganize the course of basic nursing science in a college of nursing. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 10(2), 162-169.
27 Tmobranski, P. H. (1993). Biological sciences and the nursing curriculum: A challenge for educationalists. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 493-499.   DOI
28 WitekJanusek, L. (2004). Commentary on the importance of animal research to nursing science. Nursing Outlook, 52, 108-110.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Wong, J., & Wong, S. (1999). Contribution of basic sciences to academic success in nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 36, 345-354.   DOI   ScienceOn