Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2020.40.4.227

Effect of Waterlogging on Growth and Morphological Characteristics of Roots of Maize Inbred Lines  

Lee, Jihyun (Department of Central Area Crop Science, NICS, RDA)
Shin, Myeong-Na (Department of Central Area Crop Science, NICS, RDA)
Jung, Gun-Ho (RDA)
Kim, Jung Tae (Planning & Coordination Div., NICS, RDA)
Cha, Jungeun (Department of Central Area Crop Science, NICS, RDA)
Shim, Kang-Bo (Department of Central Area Crop Science, NICS, RDA)
Lee, Jae-Eun (Department of Central Area Crop Science, NICS, RDA)
Son, Beom-Young (Cheolwon Branch, NICS, RDA)
Kim, Sang-Gon (Gyeongnam Oriental Anti-Aging Institute)
Ku, Bon-Il (Department of Central Area Crop Science, NICS, RDA)
Lee, Seukki (Department of Central Area Crop Science, NICS, RDA)
Jeon, Weon-Tai (Department of Central Area Crop Science, NICS, RDA)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.40, no.4, 2020 , pp. 227-235 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the growth characteristics of the shoot and roots and to analyse the morphological characteristics of roots of waterlogging resistant and susceptible maize inbred lines. Six maize inbred lines were treated with waterlogging for 10 days at V3, and the degree of leaf senescence was evaluated for waterlogging resistance. As a result of waterlogging resistance evaluation, KS85 was the most damaged inbred line with 3.33 senescence leaves and 5.54 degree, and KS141 was the least damaged inbred line with 1.33 senescence leaves and 3 degree. At 20 days after treatment, the effect of waterlogging stress on the shoot dry matter accumulation of KS85 and KS141 were decreased by 86.1% and 77.0%, respectively, compared to the control. Similarly, root dry matter accumulation of KS85 and KS141 were decreased by 77.6% and 65.0%. As a result of SEM photographs of the nodal roots of the two maize inbred lines, the thickness of cortex of KS141 was thicker than that of KS85, and the distortion of the cortex was observed in KS85 at 20 days after waterlogging. It was concluded that the thickness of cortex was related to maize waterlogging resistance.
Keywords
Maize; Waterlogging; Growth; Yield; Root;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ji, H.C., Lee, J.K., Kim, K.Y., Yoon, S.H., Lim, Y.C., Kwon, O.D. and Lee, H.B. 2009. Evaluation of agronomic characteristics, forage production and quality of corn hybrids for silage at paddy field in southern region of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland Science. 29:13-18.   DOI
2 Jung, G.H., Moon, J.K., Seo, J.H. and Seo, M.J. 2015. Studies on the mechanism of excess water stress for stable production of upland crops in paddy field. National Institute of Crop Science(NICS) Research Report. pp. 416-454. (in Korean)
3 Kim, M.J., Choi, G.J., Yook, W.B., Lim, Y.C., Yoon, S.H., Kim, J.G., Park, H.S. and Seo, S. 2007. Effects of seeding method on the winter survival, dry matter yield and nutrient value of Italian ryegrass in paddy field. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland Science. 27:269-274.   DOI
4 Kim, W.H., Shin, J.S., Lim, Y.C., Seo, S., Kim, K.Y. and Lee, J.K. 2005. Study on the promising double cropping system of summer and winter forage crop in paddy field. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland Science. 25:233-238.   DOI
5 Lee, K.B. 2016. Plant morphology (3rd ed.). Life Science Press, Seoul. pp. 204-211. (in Korean)
6 Liu, Y.Z., Tang, B., Zheng, Y.L., Ma, K.J., Xu, S.Z. and Qiu, F.Z. 2010. Screening methods for waterlogging tolerance at maize (Zea mays L.) seedling stage. Agricultural Sciences in China. 9:362-369.   DOI
7 Mano, Y. and Omori, F. 2013. Flooding tolerance in interspecific introgression lines containing chromosome segments from teosinte in maize. Annals of Botany. 122:1125-1139.   DOI
8 Mano, Y., Omori, F., Takamizo, T., Kindiger B., Bird, R.M.K. and Loaisiga, C.H. 2006. Variation for root aerenchyma formation in flooded and non-flooded maize and teosinte seedlings. Plant and Soil. 281:269-279.   DOI
9 Mano, Y., Omori, F., Takamizo, T., Kindiger, B., Bird, R.M.K., Loaisiga, C.H. and Takahashi, H. 2007. QTL mapping of root aerenchyma formation in seedlings of a maize×rare teosinte "Zea nicaraguensis" cross. Plant and Soil. 295:103-113.   DOI
10 Mukhtar, S., Kanwar, R.S. and Baker, J.L. 1990. Corn grown as affected by excess soil water. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineers. 33:437-442.   DOI
11 RDA. 2015. Corn. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju. pp. 102-114. (in Korean)
12 Ren, B., Zhang, J., Dong, S., Liu, P. and Zhao, B. 2016. Effects of waterlogging on leaf mesophyll cell ultrastructure and photosynthetic characteristics of summer maize. PLoS ONE. 11(9):e0161424.   DOI
13 Sass, J.E. 1951. Botanical microtechnique. Ames, Iowa State College Press. pp. 12-15.
14 Shin, S., Jung, G.H., Kim, S.G., Son, B.Y., Kim, S.G., Lee, J.S., Kim, J.T., Bae, H.H, Kwon, Y., Shim, K.B., Lee, J.E., Baek, S.B. and Jeon, W.T. 2017. Effect of prolonged waterlogging on growth and yield of characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.) at early vegetative stage. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 37:271-276.   DOI
15 Shin, S., Kim, S.G., Jung, G.H., Kim, C.G., Son, B.Y., Kim, J.T., Kim, S.G., Yang, W., Kwon, Y., Shim, K.B. and Woo, M.O. 2016. Evaluation of waterlogging tolerance with the degree of foliar senescence at early vegetative stage of maize (Zea Mays L.). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology. 19:393-400.   DOI
16 Yamauchi, T., Abe, F., Tsutsumi, N. and Nakazono, M. 2019. Root cortex provides a venue for gas-space formation and is essential for plant adaptation to waterlogging. Frontiers in Plant Science. 259:1-12.
17 Bird, R.M.K. 2000. A remarkable new teosinte from Nicaragua: Growth and treatment of progeny. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter. 74:58-59.
18 Zaidi, P.H., Rafiquea, S., Raia, P.K., Singha, N.N. and Srinivasan, G. 2004. Tolerance to excess moisture in maize (Zea mays L.): Susceptible crop stages and identification of tolerant genotypes. Field Crops Research. 90:189-202.   DOI
19 Bailey-Serres, J., Fukao, T., Gibbs, D.J. and Holdsworth, M.J. 2012. Making sense of low oxygen sensing. Trends in Plant Science. 17:129-138.   DOI
20 Bailey-Serres, J., Lee, S.C. and Brinton, E. 2012. Waterproofing crops: Effective flooding survival strategies. Plant Physiol. 160:1698-1790.   DOI
21 Go, Y.S., Kim, J.T., Bae, H.H., Son, B.Y., Yi, G., Ha, J.Y., Kim, S.L. and Baek, S.B. 2020. Analysis of growth response and gene expression by waterlogging stress on B73 maize. Korea Society of Crop Science. 65:104-112.
22 Cho, Y.S., Son, B.Y., Yoon, Y.H. and Ku, B.C. 2009. Development of technology and variety selection for paddy field adaptive disaster resistance silage corns. National Institute of Crop Science(NICS) Research Report. pp. 426-433. (in Korean)
23 Dennis, E.S., Dolferus, R., Ellis, M., Rahman, M., Wu, Y., Hoeren, F.U., Grover, A., Ismond, K.P., Good, A.G. and Peacock, W.J. 2000. Molecular strategies for improving waterlogging tolerance in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 51:89-97.   DOI
24 Drew, M.C., He, C.J. and Morgan, P.W. 2000. Programmed cell death and aerenchyma formation in roots. Trends in Plant Science. 5:123-127.   DOI
25 Edmeades, G.O., Bolanos, J., Elings, A., Ribaut, J.M., Banziger, M. and Westgate, M.E. 2000. The role and regulation of the anthesis‐silking interval in maize. Physiology and modeling kerner set in Maize (Vol. 29). Crop Science Society of America, USA. pp. 43-45.
26 Evans, R.O., Skaggs, R.W. and Sneed, R.E. 1990. Normalized crop susceptibility for corn and soybean to excess water stress. Transactions. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 33:1153-1161.   DOI
27 Gunawardena, A., Perce, D.M., Jackson, M.B., Hawes, C.R. and Evans, D.E. 2001. Characterization of programmed cell death during aerenchyma formation induced by ethylene or hypoxia in roots of maize (Zea mays L.). Planta. 212:205-214.   DOI
28 Herrero, M.P. and Johnson, R.R. 1981. Drought stress and its effects on maize reproductive systems. Crop Science. 21:105-110.   DOI