Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2017.37.1.68

Studies on Hilly Pasture Landscape Expectancy, Satisfaction of Tourist on Grassland Facility: A case Study of Yangtae Farm Visitor  

Kang, Dae-Koo (Department of Agricultural Education, Sunchon National University)
Lee, Hyo-Jin (GEOMEXSOFT., Ltd.)
Lee, Hyowon (Department of Agriculture, Korea National Open University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.37, no.1, 2017 , pp. 68-79 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of study was to find the relationship in hilly pasture landscape expectancy and tourist's satisfaction on grassland facility. It was followed by literature reviews and visitors' survey in Daegwallyeong Yangtte Farm on 31, July, 2014. 367 respondents were analyzed by F-test, t-test, Chi-square and Fisher's Exact Test at 0.05 level after data screening process. Computing factors were sex, marital status, age, academic career and occupation. The results was as followed; First, major respondents group of survey were in oder of woman, forty years old group, married office worker, and university graduate. Second, the expectancy for grassland was significant difference in age, but pasture color expectancy was not significant difference in gender, age, educational background, marital status, and there was significant difference in favorite grassland type with age, marital status. Third, favorite fence type was not significant difference along with all group of participants. However, color and material of fence was significant difference in marital status. Fourth, preferred ranch road was significant difference with occupation and marital status. There was significant difference in favorite grassland type near ranch road along with age and occupation type. Fifth, the mean satisfaction was 3.6 point in 5.0. Therefore, all respondents were generally satisfaction in visited. Tourists were more interested in ranch landscape than experience or contacts to animal.
Keywords
Landscape expectancy of ranch tourist; Satisfaction of ranch tourist; Characteristics of ranch tourist; Hilly pasture;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Luscher, A., Jeangros, B., Kessler, W., Huguenin, O., Lobisger, M., Millar, N. and Suter, D. 2004. Land use systems in grassland dominated regions. proceedings of the 20th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation Luzern, Switzerland. 21-24 June.
2 Maruyama, J. and Uchida, T. 2004. Functions of pasture environment with respect to green tourism and farm for school. Grassland Science. 50(2):217-222.
3 Nagy, G and Wiwczaroski, T. 2008. Landscape values of grasslands. Grassland Science in Europe. 13:934-936.
4 Sasaki, H. 2004. Grassland as Landscape. Grassland Science. 50(2):223-226.
5 Schirpke, U., Holzler, S., Leitinger, G., Bacher, M., Tappeiner, U. and Tasser. E. 2013. Can we model the scenic beauty of an alpine landscape. Substantiality. 5:1080-1094.
6 Schupbach, B., Gruning A. and Walter, T. 2004. Grassland and landscape aesthetics. Grassland Science in EU. 9:186-189.
7 Seo, C.H., Kim, B.M. and Park, H.J. 2015. Studies on importance to satisfaction for selection on green tourism. South-east Tourism Studies. 11(4):63-83.
8 Shoji. A. 2003. Grassland and landscape. Grassland Science. 48(6):530.
9 Wu, T., Chen, T., Fan, P., Yin, D. and Lin, F. 2013. Tourists perception and attitude to grassland tourism landscape: A case study of grassland in the central section of Inner Mongolia. Advanced Materials Research. 807-809:1856-1865.   DOI
10 Yu, D.W., Park. J.D., Lee. S.H. and Jang, U.H. 2012. Analysis of relationship of visitor's preference on rural area tour capital. South-east Tourism Studies. 8(3):283-298.
11 Barkmann, J. and Zschiegner, A.K. 2010. Grassland as a sustainable tourism resource in Germany: Environmental knowledge effects on resource consecration preferences. Intentional Journal of Service Technology and Management. 13:174-191.   DOI
12 An, P.G., An, N.H., Shin, J,H. and Sin, J.H. 2016. A survey of expert's perception about landscape elements in organic farmland. Korean Journal of Organic agriculture. 249(4):681-698.
13 Jung, D.H. 1990. Survey analysis of dairy farms, in Tong Doo Chun City, Kyung gi-Do. Master thesis of Department of the Graduate School of Aro-Livestok Department, KonKook University.
14 Cha. D.U. 2003. Analysis of revisit determination factors for tourist farm visitors. Korean Society of Rural Sociology. 13(2):75-94.
15 Hyun, N.S. 2000. A study on the housing and facilities of the dairy farms in Cheju Province. Master thesis in Animal Resource Production Graduate School of Agriculture and Animal Science, Konkuk University.
16 Japanese association of grassland and livestock. 1997. Method of ranch management. Japanese association of grassland and livestock. 1-127.
17 Kang, M.I. 2013. Application plan and real condition of stock-farming landscape around Mt. Halla Mountain Area. The Association of Korean Photo-Geographers. 23(3):93-112.
18 Kang, S.J. 1996. Studies on tourist ranches development in Jeju. Studies on fishing and farm village tourism 3(1):91-117.
19 Krejcie, R.V., Morgan, D.W. 1970. Determining sample sizes for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30:607-610.   DOI
20 Kim, M.S. 2016. Structural relationship analysis on domestic & foreign tourist's rural tourism satisfaction, local production purchase and revisit. Master thesis of Korean National Open University.
21 Lee, H.W. 2005. The role of grassland in green tourism. 31th Conference of Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 92-102.