Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.3.267

Effects of Different Energy and Protein Level of TMR on Milk Production of Dairy Goats in Early Lactation  

Ki, Kwang-Seok (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Lee, Hyun-June (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Kim, Sang-Bum (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Lee, Wang-Shik (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Lim, Dong-Hyun (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Lim, Hyun-Joo (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Park, Sung-Jai (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Cho, Won-Mo (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Kim, Hyeon-Shup (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Jin, Ze-Lin (Linyi Normal University)
Lee, In-Duk (Chungnam National University)
Kim, Wan-Young (Korea National College of Agricultural and Fisheries)
Jeo, Joon-Mo (Korea National College of Agricultural and Fisheries)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.30, no.3, 2010 , pp. 267-274 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of this experiment was to investigate effects of total mixed ration (TMR) of different nutrition level on milk production in dairy goats (Sannen). Twenty four lactating goats were randomly assigned to one of four TMRs; medium energy-medium crude protein (CP) TMR (control), high energymedium CP TMR (T1), medium energy-high CP TMR (T2) and high energy-high CP TMR (T3). The content of total digestible nutrients (TDN) and CP in the control diet were 67.0% and 13.9%. The TDN content of the high energy TMR was 73.7% and the CP content of the high CP TMR was 15.3%. Milk yield was significantly (P<0.05) higher for T1 ($2,198{\pm}115 ml$) than for T2 ($1,742{\pm}52 ml$) and T3 ($1,984{\pm}90 ml$). But there were no significant differences in milk composition between the treatments. Daily body weight gain was increased in T1 and T3 but reduced in control and T2. The result of the present study showed that dietary energy level supplied more than that of NRC recommendation did not affect milk yield of dairy goats in early lactation but prevented body weight loss.
Keywords
Dairy goat; Milk production; TMR; Nutrient level;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 9  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 NRC. 2007. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants. p. 281.
2 Razafindrakoto, O., Ravelomanana, N., Rasolofo, A., Rakotoarimanana, R. D. Gourgue, P., Coquin, P., Briend, A. and Desjeux, J. F. 1993. Le lait de chevre peut-il remplacer le lait de vache chez l'enfant malnutri?. Lait. 73:601-611.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Ruvuna, F., Kogi, J. K., Taylor, J. F. and Mkuu, S. M. 1995. Lactation curves among crosses of Galla and East African with Toggenburg and Anglo-Nubian goats. Small Rum Res. 16:1-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Sachdeva, K.K., Sengar, O.P.S., Singh, S.N. and Lindahl, I.L. 1973. Studies on goats. I. Effect of plane of nutrition on the reproductive performance of does. J. Agri Sci. 80:375-379.   DOI
5 SAS. SAS/STAT. 1997. Software for PC, SAS/STAT user's guide : Statistics. SAS inst., Cary, NC.
6 Singh, S.N. and Sengar, O.P.S. 1970. Investigation on milk and meat potentialities of Indian goats, 1965-70. Final Techn. Report Project A7-AH-18. Raja Balwant Singh College, Bichpuri (Agra), India.
7 Van Soest, P.J. 1982. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. O and B Books, Inc., Corvallis, OR. pp. 81-84.
8 陳秀琴. 1999. 奶山羊高效養殖新技術. 北京出版社. p. 27.
9 Abijaoude, J.A., Morand-Fehr, P., Tessier, J., Schmidely, P. and Sauvant, D. 2000. Contribution of main and secondary meals to the daily in take of stall-housed dairy boats in mid lactation. In: Sheep and goats nutrition: intake, digestion, quality of products and rangeland. Ledin, I. and Marand-Fehr, P. (Ed.). Cahiers Options Mediterraneennes. 52:33-37.
10 Akpa, G.N., Asiribo, O., Oni, O.O. and Alawa, J. P. 2001. The influence of non-genetic factors on the shape of lactation curves in Red Sokoto goats. Anim Sci. 72:233-239.
11 AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.
12 Cao, Y., Takahashi T. and Horiguchi, K.I. 2009. Effects of addition of food by-products on the fermentation quality of a total mixed ration with whole crop rice and its digestibility, preference, and rumen fermentation in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 151:1-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometerics. 11:142.
14 FAO. 2005. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
15 Maltz, E., Silanikove, N., Karaso, Y., Shefet, G., Meltzer, A. and Barak, M. 1991. A note in the effects of feeding total mixed ration on performance of dairy goats in late lactation. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 35:15-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Giger-Reverdin, S. and Sauvant, D. 1991. Evaluation and utilization of concentrates in goats. In: Goat Nutrition. Mohrand-Fehr, P. (Ed.). Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 172-183.
17 Haenlein, G.F.W. 1992. Role of goat meat and milk in human nutrition. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Goats, vol. II, part II. Indian Council of Agri. Res. Publishers, New Delhi, India. pp. 575-580.
18 Luttmann, Gail. 1986. Riasing milk goats successfully. williamson publishing. p. 46.
19 기광석, 임영순, 김택림, 이현준, 김상범, 이왕식, 양승학, 조원모, 김현섭, 여준모, 이인덕. 2009. CP와 TDN 수준이 육성기 유산양의 건물섭취량, 소화율과 질소 및 에너지 이용성에 미치는 영향. 초지조사료지. 29(3):269-276.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
20 김갑수. 2001. 유산양을 이용한 축산업생명공학 산업화의 가능성. 한국가스학회 가스산업과 기술 제4권 제2호: 25-32.
21 농림수산식품부. 2008. 농림통계연보.
22 박중국, 김종덕, 김지애, 유정숙, 배귀석, 김창현. 2010. 에너지 및 단백질 공급 수준에 따른 비유 중기 유산양의 유생산성에 미치는 영향. 초지조사료지. 30(1):35-42.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
23 이덕윤, 고종렬, 최낙진, 이상석, 송재용, 이세영, 박성호, 성하균, 하종규. 2003. 유형별 완전혼합 사료 급여가 반추위내의 발효성상 및 영양소 소화율에 미치는 영향. 동물자원지 45(5):805-812.   DOI
24 이인덕, 이형석. 2007. 여러 가지 조사료를 급여한 유산양의 채식습성에 관한 연구. 초지조사지. 27(4):313-322.   DOI
25 조익환, 황보순, 전하준, 안종호, 이주삼, 한태호. 2002. 한국 재래산양의 이유 후 초기 사료로 알팔파 건초의 이용. 한초지. 22(2): 115-122.   DOI
26 이인덕, 이형석. 2008. 여러 가지 조사료를 급여한 재래산양의 채식습성에 관한 연구. 초지조사료지. 28(2): 119-128.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
27 이인덕, 이형석, 2009. 혼파초지에 방목한 유 산양(Saanen)의 건물섭취량, 증체량 및 방목지 소요면적 산출에 관한 연구. 초지조사료지. 29(4): 383-388.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
28 이인덕, 이형석, 2010. 유 산양에 의한 몇 가지 건초의 섭취량, 소화율과 질소 및 에너지이용성 비교 연구. 초지조사료지. 30(1):43-48.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
29 축산과학원. 2007. 한국표준사료성분표. 축산과학원.
30 강병호, 이인덕, 이형석. 2009. 유산양의 조사료 채식습성에 관한 실증적 연구. 초지조사지. 29 (1):63-72.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn