Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.3.235

Evaluation of Fermentation Ability of Microbes for Whole Crop Barley Silage Inoculant  

Kim, Jong-Geun (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Ham, Jun-Sang (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Chung, Eui-Soo (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Park, Hyung-Soo (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Lee, Joung-Kyong (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Jung, Min-Woong (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Choi, Ki-Choon (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Cho, Nam-Chul (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Seo, Sung (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.29, no.3, 2009 , pp. 235-244 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to develop a new silage inoculant for barley at forage analysis laboratory, Grassland and Forages Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA from 2000 to 2002. Barley is very important crop in Korea. The great part of them is utilized as forage. Generally, it contains a lot of grains that are feed of animal, especially whole crop silage in ruminant. Efficient lactic acid bacteria were isolated from good barley silage by plating MRS agar containing 0.02% sodium azide, and assessed by growing and acid producing ability in MRS broth. Four lactic acid bacteria were selected, and were found to be Gram positive, rods and catalase negative and were identified to be Lactobacillus plantarum on the basis of the biochemical characteristics and utilization of substrates. Barley was ensiled at dough stage following treatment with four lactic acid bacteria, commercial inoculant, and no additive (control). After 2 months, B2-2 bacteria inoculated silage was lower pH and higher lactic acid content than others treatments. The Flieg's score and grade of B2-2 bacteria treated silage were higher than commercial inoculant. According to this experiment, Lactobacillus plantarum B2-2 (NLRI 201) was recommendable for good silage inoculant of whole crop barley silage.
Keywords
Whole crop barley silage; Inoculant; Additives; Quality;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 McDonald, P., N. Henderson, and S. Heron. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, UK
2 Moore, J.E. 1970. Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forage. University of Florida, Department of Animal Science
3 SAS. 2005. Statistical Analysis System ver., 8.01. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
4 Seale, D.R. 1986. Bacterial inoculants as silage additive. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 61 (Suppl.):9s-26s
5 Stockes, M.R. 1992. Effects of an enzyme mixture, an inoculant, and their interaction on silage fennentation and dairy production. J. Dairy Sci. 75:764-773   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Tilley, J.M.A. and R.A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Bri. Grassl. Soc. 18:104-111   DOI
7 Watson, S.J. and M.J. Nash. 1960. The conservation of grass and forage crops. Edinburgh : Oliver & Boyd
8 Zimmer, E. 1973. New methods in fodder conservation. European Grassland Federation 5th General Meeting. Uppsala. 12-15 June. Main paper. pp. 6-7
9 Cai, Y. 2005. 사료용 총체 벼 사일리지 품질 개선 기술. 축산연구소. 사료용 총체 벼 생산.이용 기술 국제 심포지엄 proceeding. pp. 103-135
10 Ogawa, M. 2003. Research of whole crop rice silage utilization in Japan. 축산기술연구소. 사료용 총체 벼 재배.이용 국제 세미나 proceedings. pp. 25-58
11 AOAC. 1995. Official method of analysis. Association & Official Analytical Olemists, Washington DC
12 Bastiman, B. 1976. Factors effecting silage effiuent production. Experimental Husbandry. 31:40-46
13 Castle, M.E. 1975. Silage and milk production. Agricultural Progress. 50:53-60
14 Demarquilly, C. and R. Jarrige. 1970. The effect of method of forage conservation on digestibility and voluntary intake. Proceedings of the 11th International Grassland Congress. Surfers Paradise. 1970. 733-737
15 Dikstra, N.D. 1957. The conservation of grass for feeding purposes in agriculture. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 5:271-283
16 Gibson, T. and A.C. Stirling. 1959. The bacteriology of silage. N. A. A. S. quarteral Review. No. 44. Summer, p.167-172. In M. K. Woolford (ed). The silage fermentation. 1984. Marcel Dekker. Inc. New York and Basel
17 Goering, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agic. Handbook 379, U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D. C
18 Harris, C.E. and W.F. Raymond. 1963. The effect of ensiling on crop digestibility. J. Bri. Grassl. Soc. 18:204-212   DOI
19 Kormos, J. 1967. A study of ensiling wilted and unwilted grass at two stages of maturity 2. Effect on milk production. Record of Agricultural Research. Northern Ireland. 16:57-62
20 McDonald, P. and P.A. Edwards. 1976. The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilization of forages by ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 35:201-211   DOI   ScienceOn
21 농식품부. 2008. 조사료 생산 확대 방안
22 김종근, 함준상, 정의수, 윤세형, 김맹중, 박형수, 임영철, 서 성. 2008. 총체 벼 사일리지용 미생물의 발효능력 평가. 한초지. 28(3):229-236   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
23 김종근, 정의수, 서 성, 강우성, 함준상, 김동암. 2001. 수확시 숙기가 호밀 라운드베일 사일리지의 품질변화에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 21(1):1-6   과학기술학회마을
24 김종근. 1999. 수확시기 및 제조방법이 라운드베일 호밀 사일리지의 품질 및 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문
25 한인규, 이영철, 정근기, 김영길, 안병홍, 명규호, 고태송. 1983. 영양학 실험법. 동명사. 서울. 한국