Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.3.179

Comparison of Yield and Forage Quality of Silage Corns at Different Planting Dates  

Son, Beom-Young (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA)
Kim, Jung-Tae (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA)
Song, Song-Yi (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA)
Baek, Seong-Bum (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA)
Kim, Chung-Kon (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA)
Kim, Jong-Duk (Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Cheonan Yonam College)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.29, no.3, 2009 , pp. 179-186 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate yield and forage quality of domestic silage corn hybrids at different planting dates. Days to silking of Suwon169 and P3394 were 62 days, respectively, the shortest among corn hybrids and Gangdaok was the longest. Cheonganok was more resistant to lodging than other hybrids. Kwangpyeongok and Gangdaok were more excellent to stay-green than other hybrids. Ear ratios to total dry matter of other domestic hybrids except Gangdaok were similar with those of DK697 and P3394. Ear ratios to total dry matter were similar in planting dates, May 3 and May 21 with 46% and 45% but June 11, low with 41%. Fresh yield of Gangdaok was the highest of all hybrids and other hybrids except Gangdaok were similar. Dry matter (DM) yields of domestic hybrids except Cheonganok were similar to those of DK697 and P3394. Total digestible nutrients (TDN) yields of domestic hybrids were no significant difference compared with those of DK697 and P3394. Fresh yield, DM yield and TDN yield of all hybrids were similar in planting dates, May 3 and May 21 but those of all hybrids were reduced in planting date, June 11 compared with May 3 and May 21. All hybrids were no significant difference in acid detergent fiber (ADF) which had values ranging from $44.2{\sim}46.2%$. All hybrids were no significant difference in neutral detergent fiber (NDF) which had values ranging from $58.1{\sim}59.9%$. There were no significant differences in ADF and NDF according to planting dates. Relative feed value (RFV) of P3394 was the lowest of all hybrids. Other hybrids except P3394 had values ranging from $84.1{\sim}85.0$ and was no significant difference in RFV. It is concluded that domestic hybrids tested in this study have high forage quality as well as high production similar to those of imported corn hybrids.
Keywords
Silage corn; Planting date; Yield; Dry matter; TDN;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 손범영, 문현귀, 정태욱, 김시주, 김종덕. 2006. 국내육성 사일리지옥수수의 일반생육특성 및 사료가치의 품종간 비교. 한작지. 51(30):231-236   과학기술학회마을
2 정승근, 이석순, 박승의, 배동호. 1996. 옥수수 재배와 이용의 종합기술. 농민신문사
3 Aldrich, S.R., W.O. Scott, and R.G. Hoeft. 1986. Modern com production (3rd ed.). A&L. Publications Inc. Station. Illinois
4 George, J.R. 1981. Grain crop production in the North Central United States. 3rd. print
5 Giardimi, A., Gaspari, M. Vecchiettini and P. Schenoni. 1976. Effect of maize silage harvest stage on yield, plant composition and fennentation losses. Ani. Feed & Sci. Tech. 1:313-326   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Goering, E.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agric. Handbook 379, U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC
7 Holland, C., W. Kezar, W.P. Kautz, E.J. Lazowski, W.C. Mahanna and R. Reinhart. 1990. The Pioneer Forage Manual-A Nutritional Guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int. Inc., Des Moines, IA
8 Phipps, R. and M. Wilkinson. 1985. Maize silage. Chalcombe Publications, Bucks SL 7 3PU
9 Rohweder, D.A., R.F. Bames and N. Jorgensen. 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. J. of Animal Sci. 47(3):748-759
10 Son, B.Y., H.G. Moon, T.W. Jung, S.J. Kim. B.R. Sung, C.S. Huh. and S.H. Ryu. 2006. A new com hybrid cultivar, 'gangdaok' for silage. Korean J. Breed. 38(2):147-148
11 서종호, 이호진. 1996. 숙기별 사일리지용 옥수수의 생육 및 수량 변화. 한초지. 16(4):291-298
12 김동암, 이광녕, 신동은, 김종덕, 한건준. 1996. 숙기가 다른 사일지용 옥수수의 파종기가 사초의 수량과 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 16(4):327-337
13 김동암. 1986. 사료작물 : 그 특성과 재배방법. 선진문화사. 서울. pp. 167-198
14 문현귀, 손범영, 차선우, 정태욱, 이영호, 서종호, 민황기, 최기준, 허창석, 김석동. 2001. 사일리지용 옥수수 신품종 '광평옥'. 한육지. 33(4):350-351