Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.1.073

Studies on the Quality and Palatability of Imported Hay and Straw  

Han, Sang-Cheul (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Lee, In-Duk (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Lee, Hyung-Suk (Woosong Information College)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.29, no.1, 2009 , pp. 73-82 More about this Journal
Abstract
The experiment was carried out from January through December in 2008 at Chungnam National University and the Unbong Animal Genetic Resources Station, NIAS. The experimental animals were twelve dairy goats (female, $30{\pm}1.8kg$), twelve Korean native Boats(female, $24{\pm}2.4kg$) and five sika deer(female, $92{\pm}5.2kg$). A total of 11 different types of hay and straw were tested in this study: such straw imported from USA in 2006 as annual ryegrass, perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and Kentucky bluegrass, and such hay imported from USA in 2007 as alfatfa, bermudagrass, timothy, kleingrass, oat and orchardgrass, and such domestic hay as mixed hay There were significant differences in chemical composition and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) among the various types of imported hay and straw (p<0.05). Besides alfalfa hay and orchardpass hay all of the imported hay contained lower crude protein (CP) and IVDMD but contained higher neutral detergent fiber(NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) than the domestic hay. According to the kinds of the imported hay, relative feed value (RFV) made the difference and the hay grades were ranged from 4 to 5, based on the RFV. According to the kinds of the imported hay, there were markedly differences in dry matte. (DM) intake and palatability ranking among dairy goats, Korean native goats, and sika deer. DM intake and palatability ranking were high in common between orchardgrass hay and bermudagrass hay, but Kentucky bluegrass straw, tall fescue straw, perennial ryegrass straw and annual ryegrass straw were proved to be very low in DM intake and palatability ranking. In conclusion, the quality and palatability among the imported hay that was tested in the study were quite variable and lower than expected. It is required to establish a better feed evaluation system for the imported hay.
Keywords
Imported hay; Palatability; Dairy goats; Korean native goats; Sika deer;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Tilley, J.A.M. and RA. Terry. 1963. A two stage technique for in vitro digestibility of forage crops. J. Brit. Grassl. Sci. 18:104-111   DOI
2 Ulyatt, MJ. 1981. The feeding value of temperate pasture factors affecting forage intake by range ruminants. J. Range Managt. 38:305-312
3 Van Dyne, G.M., J.D. Hanson and RC. Jump. 1981. Seasonal changes in botanical and chemical composition and digestibility of Diets of large herbivores on short grass prairie. X N. International grassland congress. pp. 684-690
4 Wood, J.M. and G.W. Tanner. 1985. Browse quality response to forest fertilization and soils in florida. J. Range Managt. 38(5):432-435   DOI
5 Greenhalgh, J.F.D. and F.W. Wainman. 1979. The utilization of energy in conserved forage. Forage conservation in the 80's Occasional Symposium. No. II. Brit. Grassland Sci. pp. 121-129
6 Henry, BAM. 1978. Diet of roe deer in English conifer forest. J. Wildl. Managt. 42:937-940   DOI
7 Hodgson, J., J.M. Rodrigeuz Capriles and J.S. Fenlon. 1977. The influence of herbage characteristics on the herbage intake of grazing calves. J. Agri. Sci. Cambridge. 89:743-750   DOI
8 Hofmann, R.R. 1983. Digestive physiology of the deer - their morphophysiological specialization and adaptation. In Biology of deer production. The Royal Society of New Zealand. pp. 393-407
9 Holecheck. J.L. and M. Vavra. 1982. Forage intake by cattle on forest and grassland ranges. J. Range Managt. 35(6):737-740   DOI
10 Holecheck. J.L., R.D. Pieper and C.H. Herbel. 1989. Range management; Principles and practices. Prentice-Hall, Inc. NJ. pp. 283-293
11 Jarrige. R., G. Demarquilly and J.P. Dulphy. 1974. The voluntary intake of forage. Proceedings of the fifth general meeting European Grassland Federation. Upsala. Plant husbandry. 28:98-106
12 Kirby, D.R and l.W. Stuth. 1982. Seasonal diurnal variation in composition of cow diets. J. Range Managt. 35(1):7-8   DOI
13 Osoro, K. and M. Cebrian. 1989. Digestibility of energy and gross energy intake in fresh pasture. Grass and Forage Sci. 44:41-46   DOI
14 Peel, S. and Green, J.O. 1984. Sward composition and output on grassland fanns. Grass and Forage Sci. 39:107-110   DOI
15 SAS. 2002. User's guide : Statistics, Version 9th ed. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC
16 최 정. 2004. 수입 조사료에 대한 이해와 이용방안. 한국낙농육우협회지. 24(7):128-132
17 Tayler, R.W. 1995. Hay sampling and grading. Agronomy facts series, AF-16. University of Delaware. USA
18 이형석, 이인덕. 2000. 수이봊사료의 사료가치 비교 연구. 한초지. 20(4):303-308
19 임상훈. 2000. 조사료의 수입현황과 전망. 한국초지학회 제38회 학술발표 및 특별강연초록. pp.57-93
20 축산과학원. 2007. 한국표준사료성분표. 축산과학원 농촌진흥청. 수원
21 AOAC. 1999. Official methods of analysis (16th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC
22 Arthun, D. 1981. Size number and chemical composition of defecation from steer fed four different roughage diets. M. S. Thesis, New Maxico State Univ. Las Cruces. 103
23 Crampton, F.W. and L.A. Maynard. 1938. The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nut. 15:383-395
24 Dulphy, J.P. 1979. The intake of conserved forage. Forage conservation in the 80'S. Occasional Symposium No.11, British Grassl. Soci. pp. 107-121
25 Frame, J. and R.D. Harkess. 1987. The productivity of farm forage legumes sown alone and with each of five companion grasses. Grass and Forage Sci. 42:213-223   DOI
26 Givens, D.I., A.R. Moss and A.H. Adamson. 1993. Influence of growth stage and season on the energy value of fresh herbage. I. Changes in metabolizable energy content. Grass and Forage Sci. 48:166-174   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Goring, H.K. and PJ. Van Soest. 1991. Forage fiber analysis. Agr. Handbook. No. 379. ARS. USDA. Washington, DC
28 이인덕, 이형석. 2007a. 여러 가지 조사료를 급여한 유산양(Saannen)의 채식습성에 관한 연구. 한초지. 27(4):313-322   DOI
29 이인덕, 이형석. 2008. 여러 가지 조사료를 급여한 꽃사슴(Servus nippon)의 채식습성에 관한 연구. 초지조사료지. 28(1):61-70   과학기술학회마을   DOI
30 이형석, 이인덕, 박덕섭, 박연진, 김선균, 금종수. 2001. 국내 유통 조사료의 사료가치에 관한 연구. 한초지. 21(3):109-114
31 이인덕, 이형석. 2007b. 여러 가지 조사료를 급여한 재래산양의 채식습성에 관한 연구. 한초지. 28(2):119-128   DOI