Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.1.007

Selection of Promising Forage Pea Cultivars on Paddy Field  

Kim, Won-Ho (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Lee, Joung-Kyong (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Lim, Young-Cheol (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Shine, Jae-Soon (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Jung, Min-Woong (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Ji, Hee-Chung (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Seo, Sung (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Lee, Hyo-Won (Korea National Open University)
Yoon, Bong-Ki (Jeollanam-Do Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.29, no.1, 2009 , pp. 7-12 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to compare the agronomic characteristics and productivity in introduced forage pea cultivars at the experimental field. The experiment was arranged in a randomized block design with three replications. The forage pea used in this study were two cultivars ('Livioletta', 'Austrian Pea') and one Chinese milk vetch cultivar (Chinese domestic cultivar). Flowing of 'Livioletta' cultivar was May 16th and 'Austrian Pea' cultivar was 18th May, 20 days later than the former. The 'Livioletta' cultlvar showed stronger than winter hardiness of 'Austrian Pea' cultivar. Dry matter (DM) content of 'Liviotetta' and 'Austrian Pea' cultivars were 22.5% and 20.9% chinese milk vetch showed the lowest content with 17.7%. 'Austrian pea' cultivar showed the highest DM yield with 5,617 kg/ha but the DM yield of 'Livioletta' cultivar was low with 3,652 kg/ha. The yield of CP (crude protein) and TDN (total digestible nutrient) set high at 'Austrian Pea' cultivar. And 'Livioletta' and 'Austrian Pea' cultivars showed CP content with 15.5% and 14.4% but Chinese milk vetch with 19.3%. The acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content of 'Austrian Pea' cultivar were 23.2% and 40.3%. Therefore 'Austrian pea' cultivar seems to be suitable varieties in paddy field as winter forage crops.
Keywords
Forage production; Forage quality; Promising legume; Crimson clover;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Patterson. Paul E. 1999. Dry Pea Seed. Southeastern Idaho Crop Costs and Returns. University of Idaho Cooperative Extension Service. Publication EBB4-PS-99
2 SAS. institute, Inc. 1999. SAS user's guide Statistics. SAS Inst., In, Cary, NC
3 Tilley, J. M.A. and R.A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Bri. Grassl. Soc. 18:119-128   DOI
4 농촌진흥청. 1988. 토양화학분석법
5 김동관. 2008. 남부지역 완두 추파재배시 검토사항. 전남농업기술원
6 한원영. 2008. 풋완두 재배기술. 농촌진흥청 영남농업연구소
7 AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, Virginia
8 Barnes, R.F., D.A. Miller and C.J. Nelson. 1995. Forage: Vol. I An introduction to grassland agrilture. 5th ed. Iowa State University Press. Iowa
9 Dean, G.J. 2001. Production of legume forage crops in frost-prone areas of Tasmania. Proceedings 10th Australian Agronomy Conference
10 Goering, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agric. Handb. 379. U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC
11 Moore, J.E. 1970. Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forage. University of Florida, Department of Animal Science
12 James, M. Krall, Stephen D, Miller, Jack T. Cecil, Chris bastian. 2005. Production in the high plains. South Dakota State University Extension