Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.4.297

Study on Amenity and Economical Efficiency of Multi-functionality on the Grassland  

Cheon, D.W. (National Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, RDA)
Lee, S.Y. (Rural Resources Development Institute, RDA)
Park, M.S. (Rural Development Adminstration)
Park, H.S. (National Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, RDA)
Hwang, K.J. (National Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, RDA)
Yun, S.H. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Ko, M.S. (National Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, RDA)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.27, no.4, 2007 , pp. 297-312 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is conducted to evaluate economical value of Jeju grassland and validity of its preservation, and draw up several measures to support. To measure its economical value, this study examined its environmental value and social and cultural value. For environmental value, this study used replacement method while it applied CVM method, a widely used method, to assess social and cultural value and two-level two-best choice selection method, which ask questions by assuming virtual circumstances to avoid reflecting some biased opinions. Jeju grassland has multiple functions-environmental functions such as preventing soil corrosion and flood, handling animal excrement, and purifying air, and social and cultural functions such as promoting physical and mental health and providing recreation places. From the results of the feasibility study, Jeju grassland's annual multiple functions are assessed to have a total $397,115{\sim}418,995$ million won worth. In addition, it is found that Jeju visitors recognize Jeju grassland for its functions to contribute to public interests. That is, they think it can provide attractive views and educational and recreational places and promote emotional development. Especially, many people presented their ideas that it be continuously preserved since it is worthwhile for us and our next generations. To preserve grassland's cultural resource, which create a huge economic value like this, the Government has to support a certain amount of financial aid for turning to a better grassland environment and its maintenance to realize environment-friendly livestock farming on Jeju Island and promote its tourism industry and consequently, add more value to Jeju.
Keywords
Grassland; Economic value; Multi-functionality;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 오세익, 김수석, 강창용. 2001 농업의 다원적 기능의 가치형가 연구, 농림기술개발사업 연구보고서, 농촌경제연구원, 농립부
2 윤봉택. 1997 제주돌이 깨어지는 소리. 서귀포 문화. 서귀포문화원
3 최태길, 조재환, 김태균. 2000. 더블허들모형에 의한 품질인증 상추 수요분석, 농업경제연구 41(1):81-93
4 Green, W.H., LIMDEP version 8.0 User's Manual, Econometric Software, INC
5 Caddie, J., D. Redfearn, H. Zhang, J. Edwards, and S. Deng. 2006. Forage Legumes and Nitrogen Production. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets. PSS-2590. Oklahoma State University
6 Tobin, James. 1958. Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods, Econometrica, 26:24-36   DOI   ScienceOn
7 고광민. 2004. 제주도의 생산기술과 민속. 대원사
8 Cameron, T.A. 1988. A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 15:355-379   DOI
9 서동균. 2001. 농업의 다원적 기능 연구와 평가 사례, 농업의 다원적 기능 평가방법, 농촌진흥청 농업경영자료 제63호
10 권오상, 이태호. 2001. 농업의 다원적 기능관련 실증분석 방향제시 및 정책제안, 농촌진흥청 연구동향분석보고서
11 이상영, 신용광. 2003. 주민참가에 의한 계단식 논의 다원적 기능개발, 농업경영.정책연구 30(4):688-700
12 이상영, 長各部正, 野村希品, 木各忍. 2002. 멀티미디어를 이용한 농촌경관평가의 한.일 비교. 농업경영.정책연구 29(4):639-658
13 이광석. 1997. 도시인의 휴가지 및 주거지로서의 농촌선택 성향분석,농업경제연구 38(1):35-46
14 Heckman, J.J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica. 47:.153-161   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Hanemann, W.M. 1984. Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66: 322-341
16 유진채, 공기서. 2001. CVM에 의한 친환경농업의 비시장적 가치평가, 농업경영.정책연구 28(2):238-254
17 Nawata, K. 1992. ト-ビシト.モデルによる金融資産分析への應用について, フイナンシヤル.レビコ一,pp. 29-47
18 Bishop, R.C. and T.A. Heberlein. 1979. Measuring Values of Extra Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 61:926-930   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Carson, R.T. 1985. Three Essays on Contingent Valuation, Ph. D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley
20 이광석. 1996. 농촌방문의 경제적 펀익. 농업경제 연구 37:147-159
21 Cragg, J. 1971. Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods, Econometrica, 39:829-844   DOI   ScienceOn
22 김태균. 1998. 이선선택형 가상가치평가에서의 가설적가치와 실제가치, 경제학연구. 46(4):309-322
23 오세익, 김은순, 박현태. 1995. 쌀 농업의 환경보전 효과에 관한 연구, 한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
24 이상영, 신용광, 김영, 김은자. 2004. 관광농원의 보건휴양기능 가치평가, 농업경영.정책연구 31(2):329-345
25 이상영, 신용광, 김영. 2003. 농촌 공익기능의 보전기금에 대한 지불의사분석. 농업경영.정책연구 30(3):524-535
26 Krinsky. I. and A.L. Robb. 1989. On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 68:715-719   DOI   ScienceOn
27 이상영, 신용광, 김영. 2004. 환경자원의 가치평가, 농촌자원개발연구소