Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.4.221

A Comparative Study of Dry Matter Yield and Nutritive Value of Tall type and Turf type Mixtures  

Lee, Hyung-Suk (Woosong Information College)
Lee, In-Duk (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.26, no.4, 2006 , pp. 221-226 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effect of tall type mixtures and turf type mixtures on dry matter yield, botanical composition and quality. The experimental design includes two mixture types : Tall type mixtures; orchardgrass (Potomac) 50+tall fescue (Fawn) 20+ Kentucky bluegrass (Kenblue) 10+red clover (Kenland) 20%) and turf type mixtures; Kentucky bluegrass(Newport) 60%+tall fescue (reboil Jr.) 20+perennial ryegrass (palmer II) 20%. The DM yield was higher obtained in tall type mixture than that of turf type mixture (p<0.05). In the chemical composition, Turf type mixture was higher in crude protein (CP) and dry matter digestibility (DMD), but lower in fibrous compound as NDF, ADF, cellulose and lignin than those of tall type mixture (p<0.05). The crude protein dry matter (CPDM) and digestible dry matter (DDM) yield was higher in tall type mixture than turf type mixture (p<0.05). In this experiment, nutritive value of turf type mixture was higher than that of tall type mixture, but CPDM and DDM yield of turf type mixture were lower than that of turf type mixture due to low dry matter yield. On the other hand, turf type mixture was obtained high feed value, and maintaining the various botanical composition on the 13 th cutting frequency condition. therefore, turf type mixture had a utilization possibility under grazing livestock as sheep and milk goats.
Keywords
Mixtures; Turf grass; Tall grass; DM yield; Chemical composition;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 이중해, 이인덕, 이형석. 2004. 하번초형 혼파조합간의 건물수량, 사료가치 및 식생비율 비교연구. 동물자원지. 46(3):443-450
2 Frame, J. and R.D. Harkness. 1987. The productivity of four forage legumes sown alone and with each of five companion grasses. Grass and Forage Sci. 42:213-223   DOI
3 Goring, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agr. Handbook. No. 379. ARS. USDA. Washington, D, C
4 Peel, S. and J.O. Green. 1984. Sward composition and output on grassland farms. Grass and Forage Sci. 39:107-110   DOI
5 Taylor. R.W. 1995. Hay sampling and grading. Agronomy fact series: AF-16. University of Dalaware. USA
6 Tilley, J.A.M. and R.A. Terry. 1963. A two stage technique for in vitro digestibility of forage crops. J. Brit. Grassl. Sci. 18:104-111   DOI
7 김문철, 김종하. 1999. 단파 또는 혼파초지에서 Italian ryegrass와 Kentucky bluegrass의 잡초억제 효과. 한국초지학회지 19(37):241-250
8 국민체육진흥공단. 2002. 녹색 천연잔디 운동장의 조성과 관리. 애디플러스. 서울. p 73-94
9 이인덕, 이형석, 박연진. 2000. White clover 우점초지의 갱신에 관한 연구. 한초지. 20(3):207-214
10 신기준. 1979. 혼파조합 선발시험. 농시연보. 21: 40-45
11 AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis (15th ed.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC
12 Crampton, F.W. and L.A. Maynard. 1938. The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nut. 15:383-395   DOI
13 이인덕, 이형석. 2003. 상번초 및 상하번초형 혼파초지의 건물수량 및 사료가치 비교 연구. 한초지. 23(2):121-128
14 이인덕, 이형석. 1993. 혼파유형이 목초의 수량과 품질에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 13(1):38-42
15 김내수, 김정우, 박홍양, 상병찬, 여정수, 전광주, 최광수, 홍기창. 1995. 응용통계학. 유한문화사. 서울