Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.3.127

Effect of Livestock Manure and Chemical Fertilizer on the Forage Yield and Quality of Oat at No-till Cropping System  

Kim, Jong-Duk (Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Cheonan Yonam College)
Kim, Su-Gon (Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Cheonan Yonam College)
Chae, Sang-Heon (Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Cheonan Yonam College)
Kwon, Chan-Ho (Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, Cheonan Yonam College)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.26, no.3, 2006 , pp. 127-132 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of manure and chemical fertilizer on the forage yield and quality of oat at no-tillage. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. The three treatments were: chemical fertilizer, manure fertilizer, and chemical and manure mixture. Seedling vigor was higher at chemical fertilizer than manure, but more greener at manure application than chemical fertilizer. Dry matter (DM) content of oat at manure was higher than chemical and mixture fertilizer (p<0.05). There was no difference in DM yield, TDN (total digestible nutrients) yield, and CP (crude protein) yield of oat at no-tillage system, but the fresh yield was significantly higher in chemical fertilizer compared to manure. The CP content for oat was significantly higher in manure than chemical fertilizer. However, no significant effects were observed for NDF (neutral detergent fiber), ADF (acid detergent fiber), TDN and RFV (relative feed value) in different fertilizer application. Based on the results of this study, manure don't affected forage production and quality of no-till oat except CP content because forage oat is used off-season crop.
Keywords
Dry matter; Crude protein; TDN yield; Relative feed value; Off-season crop;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Moschler, W.W., G.M. Shear, D.C. Martens, G.D. Jones and R.R. Wilmouth. 1972. Comparative yield and fertilizer efficiency of no-tillage and conventionally tiller corn. Agron. J. 64(2):229-231   DOI
2 SAS Institute, Inc. 1999. SAS user's guide: Statistics. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC
3 김원호. 1994. 작물의 잔주와 그 관리가 사일리지용 옥수수의 생장, 수량 및 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문
4 김은석. 2002. 친환경 풋 찰옥수수 생산을 위한 경운방법 및 두과 피복작물재배에 관한 연구. 경상대학교 박사학위 논문
5 김종덕, 김수곤, 권찬호. 2006. 경운방법 및 비료 종류가 호밀의 사초수량, 품질 및 생산비에 미치는 영향. 동물자원지 48(1):115-122   DOI
6 신동은. 1999. 축종별 액상분뇨와 질소(N) 시용량이 양질조사료의 수량, 사료가치 및 토양특성에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문
7 최진룡, 김정부, 조영순. 1998. 한반도에서 지속 농업의 실천방안. 지속적 벼 생산체계 개발을 중심으로. 경상대학교 개교50주년 심포지엄 : 228-312
8 AOAC. 1990. Official Method of Analysis (15th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC
9 Goering, H.L. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agr. Handbook. No. 379. USDA
10 Holland, C., W. Kezar, W.P. Kautz, E.J. Lazowski, W.C. Mahanna and R. Reinhart. 1990. The Pioneer forage manual: A nutritional guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int. Inc., Des Moines, IA
11 Hussain, I., K.R. Olson and S.A. Ebelhat. 1999. Long-term tillage effects on soil chemical properties and organic matter fraction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:1335-1341   DOI