Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2003.23.3.187

A Comparative Study on Dry Matter Yield and Quality of Turf Grasses  

이형석 (우송정보대학)
이인덕 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학)
이중해 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.23, no.3, 2003 , pp. 187-192 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate dry matter yield and quality of six turf grasses, and thus to apply its result into making mixed species in the mixtures. The six turf grasses were Kentucky bluegrass(Newport), red fescue(Salem), creeping bentgrass(Crenshaw), perennial ryegrass(Palmer Ⅱ), tall fescue(Rebell Jr.) and redtop(Barricuda). This experiment was carried out for 3-years at grassland experimental field of Chungnam National University. The dry matter(DM) yield obtained in tall fescue and redtop was higher than those of the other species(p<0.05). Consideration of crude protein content and dry matter digestibility(DMD), the species of high quality compared to the other species were creeping bentgrass, perennial ryegrass, and Kentucky bluegrass. The crude protein dry matter yield was higher in Kentucky bluegrass and redtop, it was lower in red fescue(p<0.05). On the other hand, digestible dry matter(DDM) yield was higher in tall fescue and redtop, but lower in creeping bentgrass and red fescue(p<0.05). Based on the result mentioned above, therefore, it is suggested that turf grasses such as tall fescue, Kentucky bluegrass and redtop are recommended as species of turf grass which could be used as bottom grasses in mixtures.
Keywords
Turf grasses; DM yield; Dry matter digestibility; CPDM yield; DDM yield;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김득수, 이인덕, 이형석. 2001a. 야생화 도입 초지의 건물수량 및 품질에 관한 연구. 한초지 21(3): 115-122
2 김득수, 이인덕, 이형석. 2001b. 야생화 도입 초지의 생육특성, 식생비율 및 동물상에 관한 연구. 한초지 21(4):233-246
3 박근제, 한흥전, 이종열. 1975. 화본과 사료작물 도입시험. 축시연보. 540-542
4 박근제, 권두중, 이재선, 이종열. 1977. 도입목초의 수량검정시험. 축시연보. 871-893
5 설동섭. 1988. 한국사료성분표. 농진청 축산시험장. 한림저널사. 서울. 96-120
6 이인덕, 이형석. 2003. 상번초 및 상 . 하번초형 혼파초지의 건물수량 및 사료가치 비교연구.
7 이재선, 한흥전, 양종성, 이종열. 1974. 화본과 사료작물 도입품종 비교시험. 축시연보. 561-586
8 축산기술연구소. 2002. 한국표준사료성분표. 문영당. 수원. 386-437
9 한흥전, 양종성, 한정대, 김형호. 1972. 사료작물 도입품종 비교시험. 축시연보. 366-387
10 AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis(15th ed.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC
11 Crampton, F.W. and L.A. Maynard. 1938. The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nut. 15:383-395
12 Goring, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agr. Handbook. No. 379. ARS. USDA. Washington, D, C
13 Tilley, J.A.M. and R.A. Terry. 1963. A two stage technique for in vitro digestibility of forage crops. J. Brit. Grassl. Sci. 18-104-111   DOI
14 강정훈, 박병훈, 유시룡, 한흥전. 1985. 도입목초의 생산력 검정시험. 축시연보. 738-753
15 김내수, 김정우, 박홍양, 상병찬, 여정수, 전광주, 최광수, 홍기창. 1995. 응용통계학. 유한문화사. 서울