Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2002.22.4.287

Study on Adaptation, Dry Matter Yield and Nutrient Value of Kenaf(Hibiscus cannabinus L.) on Jeju Province  

Hwang, Kyung-Jun (College of Agri.& Life Sci., Cheju National University)
Kim, Moon-Cjul (College of Agri.& Life Sci., Cheju National University)
Kang, Si-Young (College of Agri.& Life Sci., Cheju National University)
Yu, Jang-Geal (College of Agri.& Life Sci., Cheju National University)
Song, Sang-Teak (Jeju Research Health & Environment Institute)
Park, Nam-Geon (National Jegu Agricultural Experiment Institute)
Kim, Jong-Ha (Nam Jeju Agricultural Technology Centa)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science / v.22, no.4, 2002 , pp. 287-296 More about this Journal
Abstract
A field trial was conducted from May to November 2000 at four regions of Jeju province(Jeju, Seogwipo, Susan Seongsan and Keumak Hallim) to estimate adaptation, dry matter yield and nutrient value of kenafs(Everglades 41 and China Choung-pi 3) and a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid(Pioneer 947). Total dry matter(DM) yields of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid Pioneer 947, kenaf Everglades 41 and kenaf China Chong-pi 3 were 7,313, 4,653 and 5,238 kg/ha(P<0.05), respectively, kenaf China Chong-pi 3 being the highest. The region specific dry matter(DM) yields of Jeju, Seogwipo, Seongsan and Hallim area were 5,040, 5,663, 7,283 and 4,950kg/ha, respectively, showing that Seogwipo was the highest. Average DM yields of two kenaf varieties were 4,946, and 3,246 kg/ha for 1st time-cutting and 2nd time-cutting, respectively. The average dry matter(DM) yield of kenaf was significantly higher in the 1st time-cutting than the 2nd time. No significant difference in neutral detergent fiber(NDF) and acid detergent fiber(ADF) contents was found among three varieties. The average crude protein(CP) content of kenaf was higher than that of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid(P<0.05) and was higher in 2nd time-cutting than in 1st time-cutting(P<0.05). There were no significant difference in the heavy metal content of soil either between the sorghum hybrid and kenafs or between two kenaf varieties. In conclusion, the average dry matter(DM) yield of kenaf was lower than that of sorghum hybrid, Contrarily the crude protein(CP) content of kenafs was higher than that of the sorghum hybrid. The average dry matter(DM) yield of kenaf showed higher in 1st time-cutting than 2nd time-cutting, while the crude protein(CP) content of kenafs decreased with time.
Keywords
Dry matter(DM) yield; Feed values; Heavy metal content;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Wilson, R.D., T.E. Summers, J.G. Joyner, D.W. Fishler, and C.C. Sealer. 1965. 'Everglades 41' and 'Everglades 71' two new varieties of kenaf(Hibiscus cannabinus L.) for fiber and seed. Fla. Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. S-168
2 Wing, J.M. 1967. Ensilability, acceptability and digestibility of kenaf. Feedstuffs 39(29):26
3 박종문 1964. Genus Hibiscus의 품종에 관한 연구. 1. 한국재래종 및 남방형 양마의 개화와 수정. 한국작물학회지 제2호: 50-56   과학기술학회마을
4 조남기, 송창길, 강봉균, 조영일, 고지병a 2001, 제주지역에서 재식밀도에 따른 양마의 생육특성, 수량 및 조성분 변화. 동물자원지: 43(5): 755-762
5 조남기, 송창길, 조영일, 고지병b 2001. 제주지역에서 질소 시비량 차이에 따라 양마의 생육특성, 수량 및 조성분 변화. 한초지 21(2) : 59-66   과학기술학회마을
6 Phillips, S,W.A., PAS, F.T. Mccollum, III3, and Fitch, G. Q. 1995. Kenaf dry matter production, chemical composition, and In situ disappearance when harvested at different intervals. USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK 73036 and Animal Science Department, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
7 Shobert, A.D., G. Q. Fitch, and W.A. Phillips. 1997. Comparison of kenaf and alfalfa as a protein supplement for lambs consuming either fescue or bermudagrass hay. J. Anim. Sci. (suppl. 1) 75:26.(Abs.)   DOI
8 Song, X., Agata. W., Zou. G., Wu, W., Yin, H., Yu, Q., Huang, Y., Kubota, F., and Muramoto, S. 1995. Bio-production and water cleaning by plant growth with floating culture system. 1. Effect of floating culture area of rice plants on water quality criteria and biproduction. 6th International Conference on the Conservation and Management of Lakes Kasumigura. 95(1): 426-429
9 Statistix, 1996. Statistix for windows. Analytical Software. P. O. Box 12185
10 Suriyajantratong, W., R.E. Tucker, R.E. Sigafus and G. E. Mitchell, Jr. 1973. Kenaf and rice straw for sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 1251-1254   DOI
11 Webber, C.L. III. 1997. Kenaf(Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Proceedings Ninth Annual International Kenaf Association Conference. 1-6
12 Swingle, R.S., A.R. Urias, J. C. Doyle, and R. L. Voigt. 1978. Chemical composition of kenaf forage and its digestibility by lambs and in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1346-1350   DOI
13 Webber, C.L. III. 1993 a. Crude protein and yield components of six kenaf cultivars as affected by crop maturity. Industrial Crops and Products. 2: 27-31   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Webber, C.L. III. 1993 b. Yield components of five kenaf cultivars. Agron. J. 85: (3) 533-535   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Miyazaki A., Agata., Kubota, F., Masuda, Y., and Song, X. 1995. Bio-production and water cleaning by plant growth with floating culture system. 2. Water cleaning effects by the growth of several plant species. 6th International Conference of the Conservation and Management of Lakes Kasumigaura. 95(1) : 560-563
16 Amaducci, S., M.T. Amaducci, R. Benati, and G. Venturi. 2000. Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops(hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy. Industrial Crops and Products 11: 179-186   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Hollowell, J. E., Baldwin, B. S. and Lang, D. L., 1996. Evaluation of kenafs a potential forage for the southern United States. Proc. 8th Ann. Intern. Kenaf Confer.: 34-38
18 Killinger, G.B. 1969. Kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.), a multi-use crop. Agron. J. 61. 734-736   DOI